Abstract
Purpose
The 47-item positive mental health (PMH) instrument measures the level of PMH in multiethnic adult Asian populations. This study aimed to (1) develop a short PMH instrument and (2) establish its validity and reliability among the adult Singapore population.
Methods
Two separate studies were conducted among adult community-dwelling Singapore residents of Chinese, Malay or Indian ethnicity where participants completed self-administered questionnaires. In the first study, secondary data analysis was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to shorten the PMH instrument. In the second study, the newly developed short PMH instrument and other scales were administered to 201 residents to establish its factor structure, validity and reliability.
Results
A 20-item short PMH instrument fulfilling a higher-order six-factor structure was developed following secondary analysis. The mean age of the participants in the second study was 41 years and about 53 % were women. One item with poor factor loading was further removed to generate a 19-item version of the PMH instrument. CFA demonstrated a first-order six-factor model of the short PMH instrument. The PMH-19 instrument and its subscales fulfilled criterion validity hypotheses. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the PMH-19 instrument were high (Cronbach’s α coefficient = 0.87; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93, respectively).
Conclusions
The 19-item PMH instrument is multidimensional, valid and reliable, and most importantly, with its reduced administration time, the short PMH instrument can be used to measure and evaluate PMH in Asian communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.
Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty-second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 355–381.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063–1070.
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman & E. Diener (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2004). Are Scandinavians happier than Asians? Issues in comparing nations on subjective well-being. Asian Economic and Political Issues, 10, 1–25.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585.
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.
Westerhof, G. J., & Keyes, C. L. (2010). Mental illness and mental health: The two continua model across the lifespan. Journal of Adult Development, 17(2), 110–119.
Davidson, S., Sewel, K., Tse, D., & O’Connor, R. (2009). Well? What do you think? (2008) The Fourth National Scottish Survey of Public Attitudes to Mental Wellbeing and Mental Health Problems. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research Queens Printers of Scotland.
Waldron, S. (2010). Measuring subjective wellbeing in the UK. Working paper, Office for National Statistics.
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 27(5), 63.
Vaingankar, J. A., Subramaniam, M., Lim, Y. W., Sherbourne, C., Luo, N., Ryan, G., et al. (2012). From well-being to positive mental health: Conceptualization and qualitative development of an instrument in Singapore. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1785–1794.
Puchalski, C. M. (2010). Religion, medicine and spirituality: what we know, what we don’t know and what we do. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 11(Suppl 1), 45–49.
Kalra, G., Bhui, K. S., & Bhugra, D. (2012). Sikhism, spirituality and psychiatry. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 5, 339–343.
Singh, Y., Sharma, R., & Talwar, A. (2012). Immediate and long-term effects of meditation on acute stress reactivity, cognitive functions, and intelligence. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 18, 46–53.
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2010). Quality of life, subjective well-being, and religiosity in Muslim college students. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1133–1143.
Shah, R., Kulhara, P., Grover, S., Kumar, S., Malhotra, R., & Tyagi, S. (2011). Relationship between spirituality/religiousness and coping in patients with residual schizophrenia. Quality of Life Research, 20, 1053–1060.
Wang, C. W., Chan, C. L., Ng, S. M., & Ho, A. H. (2008). The impact of spirituality on health-related quality of life among Chinese older adults with vision impairment. Aging and Mental Health, 12, 267–275.
Koenig, H. G., Zaben, F. A., & Khalifa, D. A. (2012). Religion, spirituality and mental health in the West and the Middle East. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 5, 180–182.
Vaingankar, J. A., Subramaniam, M., Chong, S. A., Abdin, E., Edelen, M. O., Picco, L., et al. (2011). The positive mental health instrument: Development and validation of a culturally relevant scale in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 92.
Kalantar, J. S., & Talley, N. J. (1999). The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: A randomized study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(11), 1117–1122.
Tubach, F., Baron, G., Falissard, B., Logeart, I., Dougados, M., Bellamy, N., et al. (2005). Using patients’ and rheumatologists’ opinions to specify a short form of the WOMAC functional subscale. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64, 75–79.
Smart, R. G., Hughes, D. P. H., Johnston, L. D., Anumonye, A., Khant, U., Medina-Mora, M. E., et al. (1980). A methodology for student drug-use surveys. Geneva: World Health Organization, Offset Publication, 50.
Ware, J. E. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine, 25, 3130–3139.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. Sixth edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cramm, J. M., Strating, M. M., de Vreede, P. L., Steverink, N., & Nieboer, A. P. (2012). Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalization. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10(1), 9. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-9.
Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92–100.
Robitschek, C. (1998). Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(4), 183–198.
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.
Underwood, L. G. (2006). Ordinary spiritual experience: Qualitative research, interpretive guidelines, and population distribution for the daily spiritual experience scale. Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie, 28, 181–218.
Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 15.
Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQoL: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37(1), 53–72.
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Monahan, P. O., & Löwe, B. (2007). Anxiety disorders in primary care: Prevalence, impairment, comorbidity and detection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(5), 317–325.
Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 509–521.
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
Marx, R. G., Menezes, A., Horovitz, L., Jones, E. C., & Warren, R. F. (2003). A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(8), 730–735.
Andrich, D. (1988). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrica, 43, 561–573.
Master, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica, 47, 149–174.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
Mair, P., & Hatzinger, R. (2007). Extended Rasch modeling: The eRm package for the application of IRT models in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20, 1–25.
Stochl, J., Croudace, T., Perez, J., Bichwood, M., Lester, H., Marshall, M., et al. (2013). Usefulness of EQ-5D for evaluation of health-related quality of life in young adults with first-episode psychosis. Quality of Life Research, 22, 1055–1063.
Batinic, B., & Gnambs, T. (2011). Evaluation of measurement precision with Rasch-type models: The case of the short Generalized Opinion Leadership Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 53–54.
Kline, P. (1979). Psychometrics and psychology. London: Academic Press.
Bland, M., & Altman, D. (1996). Measurement error and correlation coefficients. British Medical Journal, 313, 41–42.
NHS Health Scotland. (2008). Mental Health Improvement: Evidence and Practice Guide 5: Selecting scales to assess mental wellbeing in adults. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland.
Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish health education population survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(7), 15.
Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Lewis, F. M. (2002). Health behavior and health education, theory, research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
World Health Organization. (2004). Promoting mental health: Concepts emerging evidence and practice. Summary report 2004.
Worsley, L. (Ed.). (2006). The resilience donut: The secrets of strong kids. Sydney: Wild and Wolley Press.
Slade, M. (2010). Mental illness and well-being: The central importance of positive psychology and recovery approaches. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 26.
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 63.
Stevelink, S. A., Hoekstra, T., Nardi, S. M., van der Zee, C. H., Banstola, N., Premkumar, R., et al. (2012). Development and structural validation of a shortened version of the Participation Scale. Disability Rehabilitation, 34(19), 1596–1607.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(30), 370.
Bartram, D. J., Sinclair, J. M., & Baldwin, D. S. (2013). Further validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in the UK veterinary profession: Rasch analysis. Quality Life Research, 22, 379–391.
Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessessment, 92(6), 544–559.
Maheswaran, H., Weich, S., Powell, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2012). Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 156.
Acknowledgments
The first study was funded by the Singapore Millennium Foundation of the Temasek Trust and the Ministry of Health, Singapore. The second study was supported by funding from the Woodbridge Hospital Endowment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaingankar, J.A., Subramaniam, M., Abdin, E. et al. Development, validity and reliability of the short multidimensional positive mental health instrument. Qual Life Res 23, 1459–1477 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0589-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0589-0