Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and validation of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A quality of life questionnaire is rarely adapted to an interview mode for people who mainly use spoken language in daily life. In Taiwan, the WHOQOL-BREF (Mandarin Chinese version) has been developed, as a self-administered questionnaire, but it cannot be applied to the majority of the elderly in Taiwan, who speak only Taiwanese (a dialect). This study adopted the audio player-assisted interview mode to develop a Taiwanese version of the WHOQOL-BREF specifically for Taiwanese-speaking elderly people, and followed with examinations of the reliability and validity of this version. Initially, the WHOQOL-BREF (English version) was translated into colloquial Taiwanese, and field tests confirmed the equivalence and appropriateness of the translation. A total of 228 Taiwanese-speaking elderly people were assessed using the Taiwanese interview version, of which 144 subjects were re-assessed two weeks later. Interviewers assessed each subject aided by an audio player on which all the translated WHOQOL-BREF contents were recorded. The Taiwanese interview version of the WHOQOL-BREF, except for the item related to dependence on medication, showed acceptable reliability (internal consistency, corrected item-domain correlation, and test–retest reliability) and validity (criterion-related, convergent, and discriminant validity). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the four-factor model of the Taiwanese interview version, providing evidence for construct validity. The results suggest that the Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version of the WHOQOL-BREF was reliable and valid in assessing quality of life of elderly Taiwanese.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 

Abbreviations

WHOQOL:

World Health Organization Quality of Life

BREF:

Abbreviated version

References

  1. Skevington, S. M., Sartorius, N., & Amir, M. (2004). Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings. The history of the WHOQOL instruments. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39(1), 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leung, K. F., Wong W. W., Tay, M. S., Chu, M. M., & Ng S. S. (2005). Development and validation of the interview version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF. Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1413–1419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jang, Y., Hsieh, C. L., Wang, Y. H., & Wu, Y. H. (2004). A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(11), 1890–1895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fang, C. T., Hsiung, P. C., Yu, C. F., Chen, M. Y., & Wang, J. D. (2002). Validation of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument in patients with HIV infection. Quality of Life Research, 11(8), 753–762.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Izutsu, T., Tsutsumi, A., Islam, A., et al. (2005). Validity and reliability of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF on an adolescent population in Bangladesh. Quality of Life Research, 14(7), 1783–1789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, W. C., Yao, G., Tsai, Y. J., Wang, J. D., & Hsieh, C. L. (2006). Validating, improving reliability, and estimating correlation of the four subscales in the WHOQOL-BREF using multidimensional Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research, 15(4), 607–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yao, G., Chung, C. W., Yu, C. F., & Wang, J. D. (2002). Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 101(5), 342–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The WHOQOL-Taiwan Group. (2001). The user’s manual of the development of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan Version. 1st rev. ed. Taipei: Taiwan WHOQOL Group.

  10. Department of Health (R.O.C). (2000). Vital statistics in 1999. Taipei: Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai, S. (2001). Language usage and occupational stratification in Taiwan: Comparing ethnic differences among men. Taiwanese Sociology (Taipei), 1, 65–111.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. British Medical Journal, 322(7297), 1297–1300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization. (1993). WHOQOL Study Protocol. WHO/MNH/PSF/93.9, Geneva: WHO.

  15. World Health Organization. (1994). WHOQOL Protocol for New Centers. WHO/MNH/PSF/94.4, Geneva: WHO.

  16. Chien, C. W., Wang, J. D., & Hsieh, C. L. (2004). Determining scale descriptors of the interview version of WHOQOL for Minnan people. Quality of Life Research, 13(9), 1529.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chien, C. W., Wang, J. D., Yao, K. P., Li, C. A., & Hsieh, C. L. (2005). Minnan version of determining scale descriptors of the interview questionnaire of WHOQOL. Formosan Journal of Medicine (Taipei), 9, 584–594.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The WHOQOL-Taiwanese Group. (2007). Development and instruction of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese Interview Version. Taipei: Taiwanese WHOQOL Group.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum Assoicates.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. L. (1995). Health Measurement Scale: A practical guide to their development and use, (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Power, M., Quinn, K., & Schmidt, S. (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2197–2214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lai, K. L., Tzeng, R. J., Wang, B. L., Lee, H. S., Amidon, R. L., & Kao, S. (2005). Health-related quality of life and health utility for the institutional elderly in Taiwan. Quality of Life Research, 14(4), 1169–1180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hwang, H. F., Liang, W. M., Chiu, Y. N., & Lin, M. R. (2003). Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan. Age Ageing, 32(6), 593–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaracz, K., Kalfoss, M., Gorna, K., & Baczyk, G. (2006). Quality of life in Polish respondents: psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL-Bref. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 20(3), 251–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Crowley, S. L., & Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 508–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boomsma, A. (1987). The robustness of maximum likelihood estimation in structural equation models. In P. Cuttance & R. Ecob (Eds.), Structural equation modeling by example, (pp. 160–188). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by research grants from the National Health Research Institute (NHRI-EX95-9504PP and NHRI- EX95-9512PI). The authors would like to thank Ms Vanessa Carson for her assistance in editing this manuscript prior to submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Lin Hsieh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chien, CW., Wang, JD., Yao, G. et al. Development and validation of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect. Qual Life Res 16, 1375–1381 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9236-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9236-y

Keywords

Navigation