Abstract
This study aims to analyze the inner-city transportation modes and rank them according to some predetermined criteria for the city of Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) method, a Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, was used to create a general ranking for the modes of vehicles operating within the city. A total of seven criteria that affect the choice of transportation type were considered in this study. These are price, prestige, comfort, timely arrival, safety, ease of payment, and courtesy. A group of experts was consulted to determine the importance of these criteria. Safety, on-time arrival, and courtesy were the most critical factors for this analysis. Four modes, UBER, taxi, minibus, and bus, were used as alternative transportation modes. The AHP method was used to estimate weighted average scores of seven criteria for four-mode alternatives. The AHP analysis results indicate that the most preferred inner-city transportation alternative is UBER, followed by taxi, bus, and minibus.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data will be presented when it is needed.
References
Achu, A.L., Thomas, J., Reghunath, R.: Multi-criteria decision analysis for delineating potential groundwater zones in a tropical river basin using remote sensing, GIS, and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 10, 100365 (2020)
Aczel, J., Saaty, T.: Procedure for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments. J. Math. Psychol. 27, 93–102 (1983)
Alejandro l. G., Covarrubias, G. O., Lızárraga, C.: Urban mobility and quality of public spaces: The case of Granada, SPAİN. Urban Transport, XXVI (2020).
Aytürk, S. Askeri savunma sistemlerinde analitik hiyerarşi ve analitik şebeke prosesi ile hafif makineli tüfek seçimi. Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi (2006)
Basım, H.N., Şeşen, H.: Kontrol odağinin çalişanlarin nezaket ve yardim etme davranişlarina etkisi: Kamu sektöründe bir araştirma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 16, 159–168 (2006)
Benitez, J., Carpitella, S., Certa, A., Izquierdo, J.: Constrained consistency enforcement in AHP. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 380 (2020).
Buwana, E., Hasibuan, H S., and Abdini, C.: Alternatives selection for a sustainable transportation system in Kasongan City. CITIES 2015 International Conference, Intelligent Planning Towards Smart Cities, CITIES 2015, 3–4, Surabaya, Indonesia, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 11 – 18 (2016)
Carra, S., Monica, L., Vignali, G.: Reduction of workers’ hand-arm vibration exposure through optimal machine design: AHP Methodology Applied to A Case Study. Saf. Sci. 120, 706–727 (2019)
Chen, C.H.: A novel multi-criteria decision-making model for building material supplier selection based on entropy-AHP weighted TOPSIS. Entropy 22, 259 (2020)
Chen, H., Zhou, R., Chen, H. and Lau, A.: Static and dynamic resilience assessment for sustainable urban transportation systems: A case study of Xi’ an China. Journal of Cleaner Production (2020).
Dağdeviren, M., Yüksel, İ: Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Inf. Sci. 178(6), 1717–1733 (2008)
Ding, Y., Yuan, Z., Li, Y.: Performance evaluation model for transportation corridor based on fuzzy-AHP approach. In: IEEE computer science, Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 608–612 (2008)
Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M.: Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Acad. Manag. J. 34(3), 517–554 (1991)
Dyer, J.S.: Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Manage. Sci. 36(3), 249–258 (1990)
Encyclopedia of Banking and Finance (1962), ABD: The Bankers Publishing Co.
Eren, T., Hamurcu, M., Dinç, S.: Kentsel ulaşım için alternatif tramvay araçlarının çok kriterli seçimi. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi (GMBD) 4(2), 124–135 (2018)
Ergüven, N.S.: Uluslararası hukuk açısından güvenlik kavramının teorik temelleri". Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 65, 771–836 (2016)
Fang, M., He, J., Ma, J., Xia, S.: Evaluation of urban green transportation planning based on central point triangle whiten weight function and entropy-AHP. Transp. Res. Proc. 25, 3634–3644 (2017)
Fields, N.L., Miller, V.J., Cronley, C., Hyun, K., Mattingly, S.P., Khademi, S., Nargesi, R.R.S., Williams, J.: Interprofessional collaboration to promote transportation equity for environmental justice populations: A mixed methods study of civil engineers, transportation planners, and social workers’ perspectives. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 5, 100110 (2020)
Forman, E., Peniwati, K.: Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 108(1), 165–169 (1998)
Geng, Z., Liu, F., Shang, D., Han, Y., Shang, Y., Chu, C.: Early warning and control of food safety risk using an improved AHC-RBF neural network integrating AHP-EW. J. Food Eng. 292, 110239 (2020)
Görçün, Ö.: Kent içi ulaşım sistemlerine ilişkin tercihlerin ve tercihlere etki eden faktörlerin analitik hiyerarşi prosesi yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Kent Akademisi 11(3), 345–356 (2018)
Grindlay, A. L., Ochoa-Covarrubias, G., Lizarraga, C.: Urban mobility and quality of public spaces: The case of Granada, SPAIN, Urban Transport XXVI (2020)
Güçlü, D.D.N.: Zaman Yönetimi. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 25(25), 87–106 (2001)
Günay, Z., Ünal, Ö.: AHP-TOPSIS yöntemi ile tedarikçi seçimi (Bir Telekomünikasyon Şirketi Örneği). PESA Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 2(1), 37–53 (2016)
Hillerman, T., Souza, J.C.F., Reis, A.C.B., Carvalho, R.N.: Applying clustering and AHP methods for evaluating suspect healthcare claims. J. Comput. Sci. 19, 97–111 (2017)
Jacek, Z., Kruszyński, M.: Application of AHP and ELECTRE III/IV methods to multiple level multiple criteria evaluation of urban transportation projects. Transp. Res. Proc. 10, 820–830 (2015)
Jiao, J., Huang, Y., Liao, C., Zhao, D.: Sustainable development path research on urban transportation based on synergistic and cost-effective analysis: a case of Guangzhou. Sustain. Cities Soc. 71, 102950 (2021)
Kumar, R., Padhi, S.S., Sarkar, A.: Supplier selection of an Indian heavy locomotive manufacturer: an integrated approach using Taguchi Loss Function, TOPSIS, and AHP. IIMB Manag. Rev. 31(1), 78–90 (2019)
Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A.: Understanding website usability: Specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships. Decis. Support Syst. 52(2), 450–463 (2012)
Lyu, H.M., Zhou, W.H., Shen, S.L., Zhou, A.N.: Inundation risk assessment of metro system using AHP and TFN-AHP in Shenzhen. Sustain. Cities Soc. 56, 102103 (2020)
Ömürbek, N., Şimşek, A.: Analitik hiyerarşi süreci ve analitik ağ süreci yöntemleri ile online alışveriş site seçimi. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 24, 338–355 (2014)
Özbek, A., Demirkol, İ: Lojistik sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin Swara ve Gia yöntemleri ile analizi. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8(1), 71–86 (2018)
Papapostolou, A., Karakosta, C., Apostolidis, G., Doukas, H.: An AHP-SWOT-Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for achieving cross-border RES cooperation. Sustainability 12(7), 2886 (2020)
Radivojević, G., Gajović, V.: Supply chain risk modeling by The AHP and Fuzzy AHP methods. J. Risk Res. 17(3), 337–352 (2013)
Reul, J., Grube, T., Stolten, D.: Urban transportation at an inflection point: an analysis of potential influencing factors. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 92, 102733 (2021)
Saaty, T.L.: The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York (1980)
Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6), 19–43 (1994)
Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2000)
Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Decision-making with the analytic network process. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Siefert, M.L.: Concept Analysis of Comfort. Nurs. Forum 37(4), 16–23 (2002)
Singh, R.K., Gunasekaran, A., Kumar, P.: Third-party logistics (3PL) selection for cold chain management: a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 267, 531–553 (2018)
Trzaskalik, T.: Multi-criterial decision-making support. Rev. Methods Appl. Sil. Univ. Technol. Broch. Ser. Org. Manag. 74, 239–263 (2014)
Ulloa, C., Nunez, J.M., Lin, C., Rey, G.: AHP-Based design method of a lightweight, portable, and flexible air-Based PV-T Module for UAV shelter hangars. Renew. Energy 123, 767–780 (2018)
Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S.: Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169, 1–29 (2006)
Wang, Y.J., Han, T.C., Chou, M.T.: Applying the fuzzy AHP in selecting transport modes for Kinmen military logistics. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 24(2), 222–232 (2016)
Wolnowska, A.E., Konicki, W.: Multi-criterial analysis of oversize cargo transport through the city using the AHP method. Transp. Res. Proc. 39, 614–623 (2019)
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study within the framework of ethical rules. A joint study was conducted to collect the data, test the data, and evaluate statistical results.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Scientific content and ethical rules have been obeyed in this study.
Consent for publication
All authors give their consent for the publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sekmen, F., Demirkol, I. & Gökırmak, H. Evaluation of urban transportation preferences with analytical hierarchy process method. Qual Quant 58, 2087–2101 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01731-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01731-7