Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do searches on Google help in deterring property crime? Evidence from Indian states

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crime is a major social problem in most developed and developing countries. It induces a social, economic, and psychological impact on the victim. Over the last few decades, India has also witnessed an increasing trend in crime rates. The majority of these crimes are property-related. This study aims to examine the relationship between online preventive searches on Google and the reduction in property crimes in the states of India. We use Poisson quasi-maximum likelihood estimation to analyze the panel dataset for four states on monthly frequency for the period 2017 to 2020. Our results indicate that preventive searches on Google are significantly related to reduced property crimes like Burglary, Robbery, and Theft. A one percent increase in preventive Google searches reduces property crimes by 0.37–0.60%. “Target Hardening” and “Formal Social Control” appear to be the highly correlated preventive inquiries, while “Surveillance” appear to be the least correlated. Our findings indicate that personal precautions are a much more reliable measure for preventing property-related crime than community-level measures. Our result remains robust for both the socially less progressive and highly progressive states. This study contributes to policy discussions by taking a new perspective, providing novel empirical evidence, and contributing to academia through its quantitative approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A detail explanation on Social Progressive Index is presented in the result section.

  2. Google Trends data is collected from https://trends.google.com/trends/?geo=IN; accessed on August 24, 2021.

  3. Searches less than equal to five thousand are considered as zero. This is done to exclude generic searches of the search term, such as, searches for academic purposes—project and research writing.

  4. The Census of India survey of 2011 is the latest survey available for India.

  5. See Neyman and Scott (1948) for further discussion.

  6. For the terms grouped under the “Informal Social Control” and “Target Hardening,” we did not find much data. We, therefore, do not estimate Eq. (3) for “Informal Social Control” and “Surveillance Index.”.

  7. Assessing the cultural and occupational impact on searches and property crime are beyond the scope of this study.

References

  • Anderson, A., Goel, S., Huber, G., Malhotra, N., Watts, D.J.: Political ideology and racial preferences in online dating. Sociol. Sci. 1, 28–40 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askitas, N., Zimmermann, K.F.: Google econometrics and unemployment forecasting. Appl. Econ. Q. 55(2), 107–120 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A.: Is poverty the mother of crime? Empirical evidence of the impact of socioeconomic factors on crime in India. Atl. Rev. Econ. 1 (2014)

  • Carrière-Swallow, Y., Labbé, F.: Nowcasting with Google trends in an emerging market. J. Forecast. 32(4), 289–298 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., Varian, H.: Predicting the present with Google trends. Econ. Rec. 88, 2–9 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.E., Felson, M.: Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. In: Andresen, M.A., Brantingham, P.J., Bryan Kinney, J. (eds.) Classics in Environmental Criminology, pp. 203–232. Routledge, Oxfordshire (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amuri, F., Marcucci, J.: The predictive power of Google searches in forecasting US unemployment. Int. J. Forecast. 33(4), 801–816 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da, Z., Engelberg, J., Gao, P.: In search of attention. J. Financ. 66(5), 1461–1499 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzer, M., Schank, T., Upward, R.: Does the internet increase the job finding rate? Evidence from a period of expansion in internet use. Inf. Econ. Policy. 55, 100900 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J., Khera, R.: Crime, gender, and society in India: insights from homicide data. Popul. Dev. Rev. 26(2), 335–352 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, M., Husain, Z.: Determinants of crime rates: crime deterrence and growth in post-liberalized India. MPRA Paper No. 14478 (2009)

  • Eagle, N., Pentland, A., Lazer, D.: Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(36), 15274–15278 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondeur, Y., Karamé, F.: Can Google data help predict French youth unemployment? Econ. Model. 30, 117–125 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamma, A., Schleifer, R., Weinmann, W., Buadze, A., Liebrenz, M.: Could Google trends be used to predict methamphetamine-related crime? An analysis of search volume data in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. PLoS ONE 11(11), e0166566 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, M.S.: Predicting crime using Twitter and kernel density estimation. Decis. Support Syst. 61, 115–125 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, G.: Internet search behavior as an economic forecasting tool: the case of inflation expectations. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 36(3), 119–167 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, E.: Culturomics: word play. Nature 474(7351), 436–441 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J.A., Hall, B.H., Griliches, Z.: Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52, 909–938 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazra, D.: What does (and does not) affect crime in India? Int. J. Soc. Econ. 47(4), 503–521 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazra, D., Cui, Z.: Macroeconomic determinants of crime: evidence from India. J. Quant. Econ. 16(1), 187–198 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intravia, J., Wolff, K.T., Paez, R., Gibbs, B.R.: Investigating the relationship between social media consumption and fear of crime: a partial analysis of mostly young adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 77, 158–168 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, L., Mani, A., Mishra, P., Topalova, P.: The power of political voice: women’s political representation and crime in India. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 4(4), 165–193 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, L., Topalova, P.B.: Poverty and crime: evidence from rainfall and trade shocks in India. Harvard Business School BGIE Unit Working Paper. 14–067 (2014)

  • Kallus, N.: Predicting crowd behavior with big public data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International conference on World Wide Web, pp. 625–630 (2014)

  • Kostakos, V., Juntunen, T., Goncalves, J., Hosio, S., Ojala, T.: Where am I? Location archetype keyword extraction from urban mobility patterns. PLoS ONE 8(5), e63980 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R.: Enter, the future of policing—cops to team up with IIM analysts to predict & prevent incidents. The Telegraph India, [online] https://www.telegraphindia.com/jharkhand/enter-the-future-of-policing-cops-to-team-up-with-iim-analysts-to-predict-prevent-incidents/cid/390471. (2012) Accessed March 03, 2022

  • Lieberman, E., Michel, J.-B., Jackson, J., Tang, T., Nowak, M.A.: Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature 449(7163), 713–716 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, K.: In search of fear: A study examining the potential of using Google Trends data to estimate the fear of crime in Sweden during 2011 - 2019 (Dissertation). (2020). Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1450066/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2021.

  • Maguire, M.: The impact of burglary upon victims. Br. J. Criminol. 20(3), 261–275 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makin, D.A., Morczek, A.L.: The dark side of internet searches: a macro level assessment of rape culture. Int. J. Cyber Criminol. 9(1), 1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavi, A.K.: An economic analysis of IPC crimes and SLL crimes in India. Int. J. Sci. Res. Educ. 10(2), 2166–2190 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y.K., Aiden, A.P., Veres, A., Gray, M.K., Google Books Team, Pickett, J.P., et al.: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–182 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naccarato, A., Falorsi, S., Loriga, S., Pierini, A.: Combining official and Google trends data to forecast the Italian youth unemployment rate. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 130, 114–122 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narita, Mr Futoshi, Yin R.: In search of information: use of Google trends’ data to narrow information gaps for low-income developing countries. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper WP/18/286 (2018)

  • Neyman, J., Scott, E.L.: Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica 16, 1–32 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F.H., Kaniasty, K.: Psychological distress following criminal victimization in the general population: cross-sectional, longitudinal, and prospective analyses. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 62(1), 111–123 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piña-García, C.A., Ramírez-Ramírez, L.: Exploring crime patterns in Mexico city. J. Big Data 6(1), 1–21 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preis, T., Moat, H.S., Eugene Stanley, H.: Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google trends. Sci. Rep. 3(1), 1–6 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rader, N.: Fear of crime. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justiceInternational Conference on Intelligence and Security (2017)

  • Saakshi, S.S., Chattopadhyay, S.: Epidemiology of inflation expectations and internet search: an analysis for India. J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 15(3), 649–671 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifter, A., Schwarzwalder, A., Geis, K., Aucott, J.: The utility of “Google trends” for epidemiological research: Lyme disease as an example. Geospat. Health 4(2), 135–137 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhri, S., Storeygard, A.: Dowry deaths: response to weather variability in India. J. Dev. Econ. 111, 212–223 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J., Hall, M.: What do we know about the effects of crime on victims? Int. Rev. Vict. 14(2), 175–217 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • St Louis, C., Zorlu, G.: Can Twitter predict disease outbreaks? BMJ 344, e2353 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs-Richardson, M.S., Cosby, A.K., Bergene, K.D., Cosby, A.G.: Searching for safety: crime prevention in the era of Google. Crime Sci. 7(1), 1–13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlastakis, N., Markellos, R.N.: Information demand and stock market volatility. J. Bank. Finance 36(6), 1808–1821 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosen, S., Schmidt, T.: Forecasting private consumption: survey-based indicators versus Google trends. J. Forecast. 30(6), 565–578 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Brown, D.E., Gerber, M.S.: Spatio-temporal modeling of criminal incidents using geographic, demographic, and Twitter-derived information. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, pp. 36–41 (2012)

  • Wilcox, P., Cullen, F.T.: Situational opportunity theories of crime. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1, 123–148 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T.D.: Human information behavior. Informing Sci. 3(2), 49–55 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Idea for the article: SB, literature search: SJ, data analysis: SB and SJ, drafted: SB and SJ, critical analysis: SB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saakshi Jha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors express their gratitude to the Editor-in-chief, the Managing Editor, and the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank Amey Sapre for valuable suggestions, Sanjukta Basu for constructive initial discussions, and the participants of the 7th International Conference on Law and Economics held at Tamil Nadu National Law University, India.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 8, 9.

Table 8 Results of panel Granger-causality test
Table 9 Unit root test results

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhushan, S., Jha, S. Do searches on Google help in deterring property crime? Evidence from Indian states. Qual Quant 58, 1255–1277 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01694-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01694-9

Keywords

Navigation