Abstract
Crime is a major social problem in most developed and developing countries. It induces a social, economic, and psychological impact on the victim. Over the last few decades, India has also witnessed an increasing trend in crime rates. The majority of these crimes are property-related. This study aims to examine the relationship between online preventive searches on Google and the reduction in property crimes in the states of India. We use Poisson quasi-maximum likelihood estimation to analyze the panel dataset for four states on monthly frequency for the period 2017 to 2020. Our results indicate that preventive searches on Google are significantly related to reduced property crimes like Burglary, Robbery, and Theft. A one percent increase in preventive Google searches reduces property crimes by 0.37–0.60%. “Target Hardening” and “Formal Social Control” appear to be the highly correlated preventive inquiries, while “Surveillance” appear to be the least correlated. Our findings indicate that personal precautions are a much more reliable measure for preventing property-related crime than community-level measures. Our result remains robust for both the socially less progressive and highly progressive states. This study contributes to policy discussions by taking a new perspective, providing novel empirical evidence, and contributing to academia through its quantitative approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A detail explanation on Social Progressive Index is presented in the result section.
Google Trends data is collected from https://trends.google.com/trends/?geo=IN; accessed on August 24, 2021.
Searches less than equal to five thousand are considered as zero. This is done to exclude generic searches of the search term, such as, searches for academic purposes—project and research writing.
The Census of India survey of 2011 is the latest survey available for India.
See Neyman and Scott (1948) for further discussion.
For the terms grouped under the “Informal Social Control” and “Target Hardening,” we did not find much data. We, therefore, do not estimate Eq. (3) for “Informal Social Control” and “Surveillance Index.”.
Assessing the cultural and occupational impact on searches and property crime are beyond the scope of this study.
References
Anderson, A., Goel, S., Huber, G., Malhotra, N., Watts, D.J.: Political ideology and racial preferences in online dating. Sociol. Sci. 1, 28–40 (2014)
Askitas, N., Zimmermann, K.F.: Google econometrics and unemployment forecasting. Appl. Econ. Q. 55(2), 107–120 (2009)
Bharadwaj, A.: Is poverty the mother of crime? Empirical evidence of the impact of socioeconomic factors on crime in India. Atl. Rev. Econ. 1 (2014)
Carrière-Swallow, Y., Labbé, F.: Nowcasting with Google trends in an emerging market. J. Forecast. 32(4), 289–298 (2013)
Choi, H., Varian, H.: Predicting the present with Google trends. Econ. Rec. 88, 2–9 (2012)
Cohen, L.E., Felson, M.: Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. In: Andresen, M.A., Brantingham, P.J., Bryan Kinney, J. (eds.) Classics in Environmental Criminology, pp. 203–232. Routledge, Oxfordshire (1979)
D’Amuri, F., Marcucci, J.: The predictive power of Google searches in forecasting US unemployment. Int. J. Forecast. 33(4), 801–816 (2017)
Da, Z., Engelberg, J., Gao, P.: In search of attention. J. Financ. 66(5), 1461–1499 (2011)
Denzer, M., Schank, T., Upward, R.: Does the internet increase the job finding rate? Evidence from a period of expansion in internet use. Inf. Econ. Policy. 55, 100900 (2021)
Dreze, J., Khera, R.: Crime, gender, and society in India: insights from homicide data. Popul. Dev. Rev. 26(2), 335–352 (2000)
Dutta, M., Husain, Z.: Determinants of crime rates: crime deterrence and growth in post-liberalized India. MPRA Paper No. 14478 (2009)
Eagle, N., Pentland, A., Lazer, D.: Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(36), 15274–15278 (2009)
Fondeur, Y., Karamé, F.: Can Google data help predict French youth unemployment? Econ. Model. 30, 117–125 (2013)
Gamma, A., Schleifer, R., Weinmann, W., Buadze, A., Liebrenz, M.: Could Google trends be used to predict methamphetamine-related crime? An analysis of search volume data in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. PLoS ONE 11(11), e0166566 (2016)
Gerber, M.S.: Predicting crime using Twitter and kernel density estimation. Decis. Support Syst. 61, 115–125 (2014)
Guzman, G.: Internet search behavior as an economic forecasting tool: the case of inflation expectations. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 36(3), 119–167 (2011)
Hand, E.: Culturomics: word play. Nature 474(7351), 436–441 (2011)
Hausman, J.A., Hall, B.H., Griliches, Z.: Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52, 909–938 (1984)
Hazra, D.: What does (and does not) affect crime in India? Int. J. Soc. Econ. 47(4), 503–521 (2020)
Hazra, D., Cui, Z.: Macroeconomic determinants of crime: evidence from India. J. Quant. Econ. 16(1), 187–198 (2018)
Intravia, J., Wolff, K.T., Paez, R., Gibbs, B.R.: Investigating the relationship between social media consumption and fear of crime: a partial analysis of mostly young adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 77, 158–168 (2017)
Iyer, L., Mani, A., Mishra, P., Topalova, P.: The power of political voice: women’s political representation and crime in India. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 4(4), 165–193 (2012)
Iyer, L., Topalova, P.B.: Poverty and crime: evidence from rainfall and trade shocks in India. Harvard Business School BGIE Unit Working Paper. 14–067 (2014)
Kallus, N.: Predicting crowd behavior with big public data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International conference on World Wide Web, pp. 625–630 (2014)
Kostakos, V., Juntunen, T., Goncalves, J., Hosio, S., Ojala, T.: Where am I? Location archetype keyword extraction from urban mobility patterns. PLoS ONE 8(5), e63980 (2013)
Kumar, R.: Enter, the future of policing—cops to team up with IIM analysts to predict & prevent incidents. The Telegraph India, [online] https://www.telegraphindia.com/jharkhand/enter-the-future-of-policing-cops-to-team-up-with-iim-analysts-to-predict-prevent-incidents/cid/390471. (2012) Accessed March 03, 2022
Lieberman, E., Michel, J.-B., Jackson, J., Tang, T., Nowak, M.A.: Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature 449(7163), 713–716 (2007)
Lindberg, K.: In search of fear: A study examining the potential of using Google Trends data to estimate the fear of crime in Sweden during 2011 - 2019 (Dissertation). (2020). Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1450066/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2021.
Maguire, M.: The impact of burglary upon victims. Br. J. Criminol. 20(3), 261–275 (1980)
Makin, D.A., Morczek, A.L.: The dark side of internet searches: a macro level assessment of rape culture. Int. J. Cyber Criminol. 9(1), 1 (2015)
Mavi, A.K.: An economic analysis of IPC crimes and SLL crimes in India. Int. J. Sci. Res. Educ. 10(2), 2166–2190 (2014)
Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y.K., Aiden, A.P., Veres, A., Gray, M.K., Google Books Team, Pickett, J.P., et al.: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–182 (2011)
Naccarato, A., Falorsi, S., Loriga, S., Pierini, A.: Combining official and Google trends data to forecast the Italian youth unemployment rate. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 130, 114–122 (2018)
Narita, Mr Futoshi, Yin R.: In search of information: use of Google trends’ data to narrow information gaps for low-income developing countries. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper WP/18/286 (2018)
Neyman, J., Scott, E.L.: Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica 16, 1–32 (1948)
Norris, F.H., Kaniasty, K.: Psychological distress following criminal victimization in the general population: cross-sectional, longitudinal, and prospective analyses. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 62(1), 111–123 (1994)
Piña-García, C.A., Ramírez-Ramírez, L.: Exploring crime patterns in Mexico city. J. Big Data 6(1), 1–21 (2019)
Preis, T., Moat, H.S., Eugene Stanley, H.: Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google trends. Sci. Rep. 3(1), 1–6 (2013)
Rader, N.: Fear of crime. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justiceInternational Conference on Intelligence and Security (2017)
Saakshi, S.S., Chattopadhyay, S.: Epidemiology of inflation expectations and internet search: an analysis for India. J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 15(3), 649–671 (2020)
Seifter, A., Schwarzwalder, A., Geis, K., Aucott, J.: The utility of “Google trends” for epidemiological research: Lyme disease as an example. Geospat. Health 4(2), 135–137 (2010)
Sekhri, S., Storeygard, A.: Dowry deaths: response to weather variability in India. J. Dev. Econ. 111, 212–223 (2014)
Shapland, J., Hall, M.: What do we know about the effects of crime on victims? Int. Rev. Vict. 14(2), 175–217 (2007)
St Louis, C., Zorlu, G.: Can Twitter predict disease outbreaks? BMJ 344, e2353 (2012)
Stubbs-Richardson, M.S., Cosby, A.K., Bergene, K.D., Cosby, A.G.: Searching for safety: crime prevention in the era of Google. Crime Sci. 7(1), 1–13 (2018)
Vlastakis, N., Markellos, R.N.: Information demand and stock market volatility. J. Bank. Finance 36(6), 1808–1821 (2012)
Vosen, S., Schmidt, T.: Forecasting private consumption: survey-based indicators versus Google trends. J. Forecast. 30(6), 565–578 (2011)
Wang, X., Brown, D.E., Gerber, M.S.: Spatio-temporal modeling of criminal incidents using geographic, demographic, and Twitter-derived information. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, pp. 36–41 (2012)
Wilcox, P., Cullen, F.T.: Situational opportunity theories of crime. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1, 123–148 (2018)
Wilson, T.D.: Human information behavior. Informing Sci. 3(2), 49–55 (2000)
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Idea for the article: SB, literature search: SJ, data analysis: SB and SJ, drafted: SB and SJ, critical analysis: SB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors express their gratitude to the Editor-in-chief, the Managing Editor, and the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank Amey Sapre for valuable suggestions, Sanjukta Basu for constructive initial discussions, and the participants of the 7th International Conference on Law and Economics held at Tamil Nadu National Law University, India.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhushan, S., Jha, S. Do searches on Google help in deterring property crime? Evidence from Indian states. Qual Quant 58, 1255–1277 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01694-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01694-9