Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender as a moderator of the relationship between Facebook® addiction and self-efficacy for learning in a college sample: the mediating effect of deliberative belief

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study explores the mediating role of deliberative belief and the moderating role of gender on the relationships between Facebook® addiction and self-efficacy for learning among 690 college students. Self-administered questionnaires, including a Facebook® Addiction Scale, a Deliberative Belief Scale and a Self-efficacy for Learning Scale were utilized to collect the data. The results indicated that there was a negatively significant relationship between Facebook® addiction and deliberative belief (β = − 0.25, p < .001) and a positively significant relationship between deliberative belief and self-efficacy for learning (β = + 0.53, p < .001). A multigroup analysis using structure equation modeling also demonstrated that gender moderated the relationship between Facebook® addiction and deliberative belief. The findings revealed that high Facebook® addiction was associated with decreased deliberative belief, which was further associated with decreased self-efficacy for learning. Moreover, Facebook® addiction tends to significantly reduce the self-efficacy for learning for male students but not for female students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Albayrak, D., Yildirim, Z.: Using social networking sites for teaching and learning: Students’ involvement in and acceptance of Facebook as a course management system. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 52(2), 155–179 (2015). doi:10.1177/0735633115571299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, C.S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, C.S., Pallesen, S.: Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychol. Rep. 110(2), 501–517 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A.A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D.A., Xenos, M.A., Ladwig, P.: The, “nasty effect”: online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19(3), 373–387 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A.W.: Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education. J. Coll. Stud. Pers. 25, 297–308 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.: Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B.: Strong Democracy. Berkeley, University of California Press (1984)

  • Barber, B.R.: Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. University of California Press, Los Angeles (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173–1182 (1986). doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107, 238–246 (1990). doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I.: Two concepts of liberty. In: Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1969)

  • Bollen, K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wily, New York (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A.: Overall fit in covariance structure models: two types of sample size effects. Psychol. Bull. 107, 256–259 (1990). doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgida, E., Worth, K.A., Lippmann, B., Ergun, D., Farr, J.: Beliefs about deliberation: personal and normative dimensions. J. Soc. Issues 64(3), 551–569 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00577.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, T.E.: Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Communication 35(2), 185–200 (2009). doi:10.1080/02500160903250648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, K., Kenski, K., Rains, S.A.: Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. J. Commun. 84(4), 658–679 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, M., Feezell, J.T., Guerrero, M.: Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline public engagement. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(5), 1535–1546 (2012)

  • Dahlgren, P.: Internet and the democratization of civic culture. Polit. Commun. 17, 335–340 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dylko, I.B.: How technology encourages political selective exposure. Commun. Theory 26(4), 389–409 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dylko, I., McCluskey, M.: Media effects in an era of rapid technological transformation: a case of user-generated content and political participation. Commun. Theory 22, 250–278 (2012). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01409.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, K.R.: Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 14, 265–285 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A., Thompson, D.: Democracy and Disagreement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A.: Democratic Education. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A.: Identity in Democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A., Thompson, D.: Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, I.: Alphabet to Internet: Mediated communication in our lives. Rada Press, St. Paul (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J.S.: The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J.S., Luskin, R.C.: Experimenting with a democratic ideal: deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Polit. 40, 284–298 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A.: Varieties of participation in complex governance, Special issue. Public Adm. Rev. 66, 66–75 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: The Theory of Communication Action. Beacon Press, Boston (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberger, G., Harper, R.: Have you facebooked Astin lately? Using technology to increase student involvement. N. Dir. Stud. Serv. 124, 19–35 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E.: Colleges face tough sell to freshmen, survey find. Chron. Higher Educ. 54(21), 1 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., Hahn, K.S.: Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. J. Commun. 59, 19–39 (2009). doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., Morris, J.: The relationship between Facebook and well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14(4), 183–189 (2011). doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanaraman, S., Sundar, S.S.: The psychological appeal of personalized content in Web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? J. Commun. 56, 110–132 (2006). doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Macmillian, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R.W., Lopez, A.M., Lopez, F.G., Shue, H.B.: Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. J. Vocat. Behav. 73(1), 52–62 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W.Z.Y., Cheung, C.M.K., Tadani, D.R.: An investigation into the problematic use of Facebook. Paper Presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, January 4–7 (2012)

  • Leighninger, M.: Using Online Tools to Engage—and be Engaged—by the Public. IMB Center for the Business of Government, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/using-online-tools-engage-public (2010)

  • Markham, A., Baym, N.: Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method. Thousand Oaks: Sage (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdizadeh, S.: Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 13, 357–364 (2010). doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D.C.: Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge University Press (2006)

  • Norris, P.: Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuss, D.J., Griffiths, M.D.: Addiction to social networks on the internet: a literature review of empirical research. Int. J. Environ. Public Health 8, 3528–3552 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C.: Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York (1970)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M.D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., Witty, J.V.: Findings on Facebook in higher education: a comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet High. Educ. 13(3), 134–140 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Mico, J.L., Diaz-Noci, J., Koldo, M., Masip, P.: Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. Int. J. Press/Polit. 16(4), 463–487 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T., Xenos, S.: Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the big five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness and Facebook usage. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 1658–1664 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana, A.D.: Online readers’ comments represent new opinion pipeline. Newsp. Res. J. 32(3), 66–81 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M.E.: Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol. Methodol. 13, 290–312 (1982). doi:10.2307/270723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J.H., Lind, J.: Statistically-Based Tests for the Number of Common Factors. Paper Presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, N.J., Scacco, J.M., Muddiman, A., Curry, A.L.: Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ facebook® sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 20, 188–203 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, D. V., Rojas, H., & Cho, J.: Media and civic participation: On understanding and misunderstanding communication effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 207–227). Routledge, New York (2009)

  • Shi, R., Messaris, P., Cappella, J.N.: Effects of online comments on smokers’ perception of antismoking public service announcements. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19(4), 975–990 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, N.J.: Polarization and partisan selective exposure. J. Commun. 60, 556–576 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, C.S., Lodge, M.: Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50(3), 755–769 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tess, P.A.: The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – a literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(5), A60–A68 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.H., Lougheed, E.: Frazzled by facebook? An exploratory study of gender differences in social network communication among undergraduate men and women. Coll. Stud. J. 46(1), 88–98 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Throgmorton, J.A.: The rhetorics of policy analysis. Policy Sci. 24, 153–179 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L.R., Lewis, C.: A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38, 1–10 (1973). doi:10.1007/BF02291170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., Kee, K.F.: Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook® use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 14, 875–901 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., Scherman, A.: The social media basis of you protest behavior: the case of Chile. J. Commun. 62, 299–314 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, T., Link, M.: Facebook® user research using a probability-based sample and behavioral data. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19, 1042–1052 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojcieszak, M.E., Mutz, D.C.: Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? J. Commun. 59, 40–56 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenos, M., Moy, P.: Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. J. Commun. 57(4), 704–718 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J.F.: Participatory Democracy: Populism Revived. Praeger, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-wen Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Cw. Gender as a moderator of the relationship between Facebook® addiction and self-efficacy for learning in a college sample: the mediating effect of deliberative belief. Qual Quant 52, 2435–2454 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0576-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0576-6

Keywords

Navigation