Abstract
A very important area of financial risk management is systemic risk modelling, which concerns the estimation of the interrelationships between financial institutions, with the aim of establishing which of them are more central and, therefore, more contagious/subject to contagion. The aim of this paper is to develop a systemic risk model which, differently from existing ones, employs not only the information contained in financial market prices, but also big data coming from financial tweets. From a methodological viewpoint, we propose a new framework, based on categorical graphical models, that can estimate systemic risks with models based on two different sources: financial markets and financial tweets, and suggest a way to combine them, using a Bayesian approach. From an applied viewpoint, we present the first systemic risk model based on big data, and show that such a model can shed further light on the interrelationships between financial institutions. This can help predicting the level of returns of a bank, conditionally on the others, for example when a shock occurs in another bank.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya, V.V., Pedersen, L.H., Philippon, T., Richardson, M.: Measuring systemic risk. Working paper, Federal Reserve of Cleveland (2010)
Adrian, T., Brunnermeier, M.K.: CoVaR. Technical report, Princeton University (2009)
Banerjee, O., El Ghaoui, L., d’Aspremont, A.: Model selection through sparse maximum likelihood estimation for multivariate Gaussian or binary data. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 485–516 (2008)
Benoit, S., Colliard, J.E., Hurlin, C., Perignon, C.: Where the risks lie: a survey on systemic risk. HEC Paris Research Paper No. FIN-2015-1088 (2015)
Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A., Pelizzon, L.: Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sector. J. Financ. Econ. 104(3), 535–559 (2012)
Bollen, J., Mao, H., Zeng, X.: Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J. Comput. Sci. 2(1), 1–8 (2011)
Bordino, I., Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., Cristelli, M., Ukkonen, A., Weber, I.: Web search queries can predict stock market volumes. PloS One 7(7), e40014 (2012)
Brownlees, C.T., Engle, R.F.: Volatility, correlation and tails for systemic risk measurement. Technical report, New York University (2011)
Choi, H., Varian, H.: Predicting the present with google trends. Econ. Rec. 88(s1), 2–9 (2012)
Dawid, A.P., Lauritzen, S.L.: Hyper Markov laws in the statistical analysis of decomposable graphical models. Risk Books (1993)
Denev, A.: Probabilistic graphical models: a new way of thinking in financial modelling. Ann. Stat. 321, 1272–1317 (2015)
Denev, A.: Financial networks as directed cyclic graphs. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2392756 (2014)
Feldman, R.: Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis. Commun. ACM 56(4), 82–89 (2013)
Giudici, P., Spelta, A.: Graphical network models for international financial flows. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 34(1), 128–138 (2016)
Giudici, P.: Applied data mining. Wiley, New York (2003)
Kenett, D.Y., Tumminello, M., Madi, A., Gur-Gershgoren, G., Mantegna, R.N., Ben-Jacob, E.: Dominating clasp of the financial sector revealed by partial correlation analysis of the stock market. PLoS One 5(12), e15032 (2010)
Lauritzen, S.L.: Graphical models. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
Merton, R.C.: On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J. Finance 2, 449–471 (1974)
Ravikumar, P., Wainwright, M.J., Lafferty, J.: High dimensional ising model selection using ‘1regularized logistic regression. Ann. Stat. 38(3), 1287–1319 (2010)
Vasicek, O.A.: Credit valuation. KMV corporation, March (1984)
Whittaker, J.: Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. Wiley, Lancaster (1990)
Yang, E., Baker, Y., Ravikumar, P., Allen, G., Liu, Z.: Mixed graphical models via exponential families. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 33, 1042–1050 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cerchiello, P., Giudici, P. Categorical network models for systemic risk measurement. Qual Quant 51, 1593–1609 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0354-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0354-x