Abstract
In the behavioral sciences, response variables are often non-continuous, ordinal variables. Conventional structural equation models (SEMs) have been generalized to accommodate ordinal responses. In this study, three different estimation methods on real data were performed with ordinal variables. Empirical results obtained from the different estimation methods on given real large sample educational data were investigated and compared to recent simulation results. As a result, even very large sample is available, model estimations and fits for ordinal data are affected from inconvenient estimation methods thus it is concluded that asymptotically distribution free estimation method specialized for ordinal variables is more convenient way to model ordinal variables.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aish A.M., Joreskog K.G.: A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: an application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares. Qual. Quant. 24, 405–426 (1990)
Browne M.W.: Covariance structures. In: Hawkins, D.M. (ed.) Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis, pp. 72–141. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Browne M.W.: Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 37, 62–83 (1984)
Chamberlain G.: Multivariate regression models for panel data. J. Econom. 18, 5–46 (1982)
Chou, C.P., Bentler, P.M., Satorra, A.: Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for nonnormal data in covariance structure analysis: a monte carlo study. Technical report, University of California, Los Angeles (1989)
Ferguson T.S.: A method of generating best asymptotically normal estimates with application to the estimation of bacterial densities. Ann. Math. Stat. 29, 1046–1062 (1958)
Fuller W.A., Schnell D., Sullivan G., Kennedy W.J.: Survey variance computations on the personal computer. Paper delivered at the 46th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Tokyo (1987)
Jöreskog K.G.: Latent variable modeling with ordinal variables. In: Haagen, K., Barthholomew, D.J., Deistler, M. (eds) Statistical Modelling and Latent Variables, pp. 163–171. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1993)
Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D.: LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. SPSS Publications, Chicago (1989)
Lee S.Y., Poon W.-Y., Bentler P.M.: A three stage estimation procedure for structural equation models with polytomous variables. Psychometrika 49, 115–132 (1990)
Lei P.W.: Evaluating estimation methods for ordinal data in structural equation modeling. Qual. Quant. 43, 495–507 (2009)
Magnus J., Neudecker H.: Matrix Differential Calculus. Wiley, New York (1988)
Muthén B.: Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. J. Econom. 22, 48–65 (1983)
Muthén B.: A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49, 115–132 (1984)
Muthén, B.: LISCOMP analysis of linear structural equations with a comprehensive measurement model. Theoretical Integration and User’s Guide. Scientific Software, Mooresville (1987)
Muthén B., Kaplan D.: A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of nonnormal likert variables. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 38, 171–189 (1985)
Muthén B., Kaplan D.: A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal likert variables: a note on the size of the model. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 45, 19–30 (1992)
Muthén B., Satorra A.: Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. In: Marsden, P.V. (ed.) Sociological Methodology, pp. 267–316. American Sociological Association, Washington (1995)
Olsson U.: On the robustness of factor analysis against crude classification of the observations. Multivar. Behav. Res. 14, 485–500 (1979)
Satorra A.: Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: a unified approach. Psychometrika 54, 131–151 (1989)
Satorra A.: Robustness issues in structural equation modeling: a review of recent developments. Qual. Quant. 24, 367–386 (1990)
Satorra A.: Asymptotic robust inferences in the analysis of mean and covariance structures. In: Marsden, P. (ed.) Sociological Methodology, pp. 249–278. Blackwell, Oxford (1992)
Satorra, A., Bentler, P.M.: Scaling corrections for chi-square test statistics in covariance structure analysis. In: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, 308–311 (1988)
Satorra A., Bentler P.M.: Model conditions for asymptotic robustness in the analysis of linear relations. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 10, 235–249 (1990)
Satorra A., Bentler P.M.: Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: Eye, A., Clogg, C.C. (eds) Latent Variables Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research, pp. 399–419. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Şimşek G.G., Noyan F.: The effect of perceived instructional effectiveness on student loyalty: a multilevel structural equation model. Hacettepe Univ. J. Educ. 36, 109–118 (2009)
Skrondral, A., Rabe-Hesketh, S.: Structural equation modeling: categorical variables. Entry for the encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, Wiley (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Şimşek, G.G., Noyan, F. Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables: a large sample case study. Qual Quant 46, 1571–1581 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9467-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9467-4