References
Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Diesing, P. (1971). Patterns of discovery in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine.
Earl, J. (2000). Methods, movements, and outcomes: Methodological difficulties in the study of extra-movement outcomes. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, 22, 3–25.
Falleti, T., & Lynch, J. (2007). Causal mechanisms and context in comparative historical analysis. Unpublished paper presented to the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago.
Falleti, T., & Lynch, J. (2008). From process to mechanism: Varieties of disaggregation. Qualitative Sociology, 31, 4. DOI 10.1007/s11133-008-9102-4.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Lichbach, M. I. (1997). Contentious maps of contentious politics. Mobilization, 2, 87–98.
Lichbach, M. I. (2005). How to organize your mechanisms: Research programs, stylized facts, and historical narratives. In C. Davenport, H. Johnston, & C. Mueller (Eds.), Repression and mobilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lichterman, P. (2005). Elusive togetherness: Church groups trying to bridge America’s divisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Margadant, D. (1979). French peasants in revolt: The insurrection of 1851. Princeton NY: Princeton University Press.
McAdam, D. (1983). Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. American Sociological Review, 48, 735–754.
Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movement–countermovement interaction and the structure of political opportunities. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1628–1660.
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–1053.
Snow, D., & Anderson, L. (1991). Researching the homeless: The characteristic features and virtues of the case study. In J. R. Feagin, et al. (Ed.), A case for the case study. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2007). Contentious politics and social movements. In C. Boix & S. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McAdam, D., Tilly, C. & Tarrow, S. Progressive Polemics: Reflections on Four Stimulating Commentaries. Qual Sociol 31, 361–367 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-008-9103-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-008-9103-3