Abstract
Quantum state synthesis typically aims to convert an initial direct-product state into a highly entangled target state. As a benchmark problem, we consider the task of spreading one excitation among N two-level atoms or qubits. Starting from an initial state where one qubit is excited, we seek a target state where all qubits have the same excitation amplitude—a generalized-W state. This target is to be reached by suitably chosen pairwise exchange interactions. For example, we may have a setup where any pair of qubits can be brought into proximity for a controllable period of time. We describe three protocols that accomplish this task, each with \(N-1\) tightly constrained steps. In the first, one atom acts as a flying qubit that sequentially interacts with all others. In the second, qubits interact pairwise in sequential order. In these two cases, the required interaction times follow a pattern with an elegant geometric interpretation. They correspond to angles within the spiral of Theodorus—a construction known for more than two millennia. The third protocol follows a divide-and-conquer approach—dividing equally between two qubits at each step. For large N, the flying-qubit protocol yields a total interaction time that scales as \(\sqrt{N}\), while the sequential approach scales linearly with N. For the divide-and-conquer approach, the time has a lower bound that scales as \(\log N\)—achievable when multiple exchange interactions can take place in parallel. We argue that this is the optimal solution that requires the least time. For any protocol that achieves this task, the phase differences in the final state cannot be independently controlled. As an example, we show that a W state (where all phases are equal) cannot be generated by pairwise exchange.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burkard, G., Loss, D., DiVincenzo, D.P., Smolin, J.A.: Physical optimization of quantum error correction circuits. Phys. Rev. B 60, 11404–11416 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.11404
Boozer, A.D.: Time-optimal synthesis of su(2) transformations for a spin-1/2 system. Phys. Rev. A 85, 012317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.012317
Geng, J., Wu, Y., Wang, X., Xu, K., Shi, F., Xie, Y., Rong, X., Du, J.: Experimental time-optimal universal control of spin qubits in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 170501 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.170501
van Frank, S., Bonneau, M., Schmiedmayer, J., Hild, S., Gross, C., Cheneau, M., Bloch, I., Pichler, T., Negretti, A., Calarco, T., Montangero, S.: Optimal control of complex atomic quantum systems. Sci. Rep. 6, 34187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34187
Bukov, M., Day, A.G.R., Sels, D., Weinberg, P., Polkovnikov, A., Mehta, P.: Reinforcement learning in different phases of quantum control. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031086 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031086
Day, A.G.R., Bukov, M., Weinberg, P., Mehta, P., Sels, D.: Glassy phase of optimal quantum control. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 020601 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.020601
Tatsuhiko, K.: Quantum brachistochrone. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 380, 20210273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0273
Abdel-Aty, M.: Quantum information entropy and multi-qubit entanglement. Prog. Quant. Electron. 31(1), 1–49 (2007)
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
Tóth, G.: Detection of multipartite entanglement in the vicinity of symmetric dicke states. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24(2), 275–282 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.24.000275
Devi, A.R.U., Prabhu, R., Rajagopal, A.K.: Characterizing multiparticle entanglement in symmetric \(n\)-qubit states via negativity of covariance matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060501 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.060501
Bengtsson, I., Zyczkowski, K.: A brief introduction to multipartite entanglement (2016)
Dür, W., Vidal, G., Cirac, J.I.: Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314
Neven, A., Martin, J., Bastin, T.: Entanglement robustness against particle loss in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 98, 062335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.062335
Zou, X., Pahlke, K., Mathis, W.: Generation of an entangled four-photon w state. Phys. Rev. A 66, 044302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.044302
Biswas, A., Agarwal, G.S.: Preparation of w, ghz, and two-qutrit states using bimodal cavities. J. Mod. Opt. 51(11), 1627–1636 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340408232477
Linington, I.E., Vitanov, N.V.: Decoherence-free preparation of dicke states of trapped ions by collective stimulated raman adiabatic passage. Phys. Rev. A 77, 062327 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.062327
Ye, X.F., Chen, M.F.: Generating w state with qubits of superconducting quantum interference devices via adiabatic passage. Commun. Theor. Phys. 55(5), 868 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/55/5/24
Galiautdinov, A.: Simple protocol for generating w states in resonator-based quantum computing architectures (2012) arXiv:1203.5534
Perez-Leija, A., Hernandez-Herrejon, J.C., Moya-Cessa, H., Szameit, A., Christodoulides, D.N.: Generating photon-encoded \(w\) states in multiport waveguide-array systems. Phys. Rev. A 87, 013842 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.013842
Çakmak, B., Campbell, S., Vacchini, B., Müstecaplıoğlu, O.E., Paternostro, M.: Robust multipartite entanglement generation via a collision model. Phys. Rev. A 99, 012319 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.012319
Sharma, A., Tulapurkar, A.A.: Generation of \(n\)-qubit \(w\) states using spin torque. Phys. Rev. A 101, 062330 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.062330
Cole, D.C., Wu, J.J., Erickson, S.D., Hou, P.Y., Wilson, A.C., Leibfried, D., Reiter, F.: Dissipative preparation of w states in trapped ion systems. New J. Phys. 23(7), 073001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac09c8
Diker, F.: Deterministic construction of arbitrary \(w\) states with quadratically increasing number of two-qubit gates (2022) arXiv:1606.09290
Häffner, H., Hänsel, W., Roos, C.F., Benhelm, J., Chek-al-kar, D., Chwalla, M., Körber, T., Rapol, U.D., Riebe, M., Schmidt, P.O., Becher, C., Gühne, O., Dür, W., Blatt, R.: Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions. Nature 438(7068), 643–646 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04279
Neeley, M., Bialczak, R.C., Lenander, M., Lucero, E., Mariantoni, M., O’Connell, A.D., Sank, D., Wang, H., Weides, M., Wenner, J., Yin, Y., Yamamoto, T., Cleland, A.N., Martinis, J.M.: Generation of three-qubit entangled states using superconducting phase qubits. Nature 467(7315), 570–573 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09418
Rao, K.R.K., Kumar, A.: Entanglement in a 3-spin heisenberg-xy chain with nearest-neighbor interactions, simulated in an nmr quantum simulator. Int. J. Quant. Inf. 10(04), 1250039 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749912500396
Gräfe, M., Heilmann, R., Perez-Leija, A., Keil, R., Dreisow, F., Heinrich, M., Moya-Cessa, H., Nolte, S., Christodoulides, D.N., Szameit, A.: On-chip generation of high-order single-photon w-states. Nat. Photon. 8(10), 791–795 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.204
Kagalwala, K.H., Di Giuseppe, G., Abouraddy, A.F., Saleh, B.E.A.: Single-photon three-qubit quantum logic using spatial light modulators. Nat. Commun. 8(1), 739 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00580-x
Cruz, D., Fournier, R., Gremion, F., Jeannerot, A., Komagata, K., Tosic, T., Thiesbrummel, J., Chan, C.L., Macris, N., Dupertuis, M.A., Javerzac-Galy, C.: Efficient quantum algorithms for ghz and w states, and implementation on the ibm quantum computer. Adv. Quant. Technol. 2(5–6), 1900015 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.201900015
Russ, L., DeVoogt, A.: The Complete Mancala Games Book: How To Play the World’s Oldest Board Games (Da Capo Press) (1999) https://books.google.ca/books?id=BA9yHQAACAAJ
Loss, D., DiVincenzo, D.P.: Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A 57, 120–126 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120
Anderlini, M., Lee, P.J., Brown, B.L., Sebby-Strabley, J., Phillips, W.D., Porto, J.V.: Controlled exchange interaction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 448(7152), 452–456 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06011
Kaufman, A.M., Lester, B.J., Foss-Feig, M., Wall, M.L., Rey, A.M., Regal, C.A.: Entangling two transportable neutral atoms via local spin exchange. Nature 527(7577), 208–211 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16073
Jensen, J.H.M., Sørensen, J.J., Mølmer, K., Sherson, J.F.: Time-optimal control of collisional \(\sqrt{\rm swap }\) gates in ultracold atomic systems. Phys. Rev. A 100, 052314 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052314
Nemirovsky, J., Sagi, Y.: Fast universal two-qubit gate for neutral fermionic atoms in optical tweezers. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013113 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013113
Hayes, D., Julienne, P.S., Deutsch, I.H.: Quantum logic via the exchange blockade in ultracold collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070501 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.070501
Petta, J.R., Johnson, A.C., Taylor, J.M., Laird, E.A., Yacoby, A., Lukin, M.D., Marcus, C.M., Hanson, M.P., Gossard, A.C.: Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science 309(5744), 2180–2184 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116955
Maune, B.M., Borselli, M.G., Huang, B., Ladd, T.D., Deelman, P.W., Holabird, K.S., Kiselev, A.A., Alvarado-Rodriguez, I., Ross, R.S., Schmitz, A.E., Sokolich, M., Watson, C.A., Gyure, M.F., Hunter, A.T.: Coherent singlet-triplet oscillations in a silicon-based double quantum dot. Nature 481(7381), 344–347 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10707
Kandel, Y.P., Qiao, H., Nichol, J.M.: Perspective on exchange-coupled quantum-dot spin chains. Appl. Phys. Lett. 119(3), 030501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055908
van Woerkom, D.J., Scarlino, P., Ungerer, J.H., Müller, C., Koski, J.V., Landig, A.J., Reichl, C., Wegscheider, W., Ihn, T., Ensslin, K., Wallraff, A.: Microwave photon-mediated interactions between semiconductor qubits. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.041018
Davis, P., Gautschi, W., Iserles, A.: Spirals: From Theodorus to Chaos. Taylor & Francis (1993)
Gronau, D.: The spiral of Theodorus. Am. Math. Month. 111(3), 230–237 (2004)
Hlawka, E.: Gleichverteilung und quadratwurzelschnecke. Monatshefte für Mathematik 89(1), 19–44 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01571563
Landig, A.J., Koski, J.V., Scarlino, P., Müller, C., Abadillo-Uriel, J.C., Kratochwil, B., Reichl, C., Wegscheider, W., Coppersmith, S.N., Friesen, M., Wallraff, A., Ihn, T., Ensslin, K.: Virtual-photon-mediated spin-qubit-transmon coupling. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 5037 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13000-z
Borjans, F., Croot, X.G., Mi, X., Gullans, M.J., Petta, J.R.: Resonant microwave-mediated interactions between distant electron spins. Nature 577(7789), 195–198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1867-y
Kandel, Y.P., Qiao, H., Fallahi, S., Gardner, G.C., Manfra, M.J., Nichol, J.M.: Coherent spin-state transfer via heisenberg exchange. Nature 573(7775), 553–557 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1566-8
Ferrón, A., Serra, P., Osenda, O.: Understanding the propagation of excitations in quantum spin chains with different kind of interactions. Phys. Script. 97(11), 115103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac955c
Sägesser, T., Matt, R., Oswald, R., Home, J.P.: Robust dynamical exchange cooling with trapped ions. New J. Phys. 22(7), 073069 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab9e32
Acknowledgements
We thank Jean-Sébastien Bernier and G. Baskaran for insightful discussions. RG was supported by Discovery Grant 2022-05240 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Theerthagiri, L., Ganesh, R. Spreading entanglement through pairwise exchange interactions. Quantum Inf Process 22, 355 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-04104-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-04104-z