Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Property rights and competing for the affections of Demos: the impact of the 1867 Reform Act on stock prices

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 1867 Reform Act in Britain extended the electoral franchise to the skilled but propertyless urban working classes. Using stock market data and exploiting the fact that foreign and domestic equities traded simultaneously on the London market, this paper finds that investors in British firms reacted negatively to the passage of this Act. We suggest that this finding is consistent with investors foreseeing future alterations of property rights arising from the pressure that the large newly enfranchised group would bring to bear on government policy. We also suggest that our findings appear to be more consistent with the Tory political competition explanation for the Act rather than the Whig threat-of-revolution explanation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson, G. G., Hickson, C. R., Turner, J. D., & Ye, Q. (2009). Rule Britannia!: British stock market returns, 1825–1870. Journal of Economic History, 69, 1106–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). Why did the West extend the franchise? democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1167–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). A theory of political transitions. American Economic Review, 91, 938–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2005). From education to democracy? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 95, 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, 98, 938–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aidt, T. S., Dutta, J., & Loukoinova, E. (2006). Democracy comes to Europe: franchise extension and fiscal outcomes 1830–1938. European Economic Review, 50, 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, P. S. (1979). The rise and fall of freedom of contract. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1999). Determinants of Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107, S158–S183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennion, F. (1981). Modern royal assent procedure at Westminster. Statute Law Review, 2, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, A. (1959). The age of improvement 1783–1867. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheffins, B. R. (2008). Corporate ownership and control: British business transformed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, M. (1967). 1867: Disraeli, Gladstone and revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dicey, A. V. (1917). Lectures on the relation between law and public opinion in England during the nineteenth century. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, G. L. (1895). The development of parliament during the nineteenth century. London: Longman, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, M., & Gay, O. (2005). The royal prerogative. Standard Note of House of Commons Library, SN/PC/03861.

  • Evans, E. J. (1983a). The great reform act of 1832. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. J. (1983b). The forging of the modern state: early industrial Britain, 1783–1870. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. J. (2000). Parliamentary reform, c.1770–1918. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2001). The cash nexus: money and power in the modern world, 1700–2000. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, T. F. (1980). The second reform movement, 1848–1867. Albion, 12, 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J., Bond, P., Barndt, W. T., & Moreno, C. (2005). Democracy and economic growth: a historical perspective. World Politics, 57, 323–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaesar, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 271–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttsman, W. L. (1974). The British political elite and the class structure. In P. Stanworth & A. Giddens (Eds.), Elites and power in British society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (1965). Before the socialists: studies in labour and politics 1861–1881. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, F. H. (1934). The reform bill of 1867 and the British party system. The Pacific Historical Review, 3, 216–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelfarb, G. (1966). The politics of democracy: the English reform act of 1867. Journal of British Studies, 6, 97–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, T. A., & Kenny, L. W. (1997). The effect of the expansion of the voting franchise on the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 54–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justman, M., & Gradstein, M. (1999). The industrial revolution, political transition, and the subsequent decline in inequality in 19th-century Britain. Explorations in Economic History, 36, 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J. (1994). Aspects of British political history, 1815–1914. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P. H. (2003). Voice and growth: was Churchill right? Journal of Economic History, 63, 315–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requirements of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizzeri, A., & Persico, N. (2004). Why did the elites extend the suffrage? democracy and the scope of government, with an application to Britain’s ‘age of reform’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 707–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J. R., & Kenny, L. W. (1999). Did women’s suffrage change the size and scope of government? Journal of Political Economy, 107, 1163–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2008). Women’s suffrage, political responsiveness, and child survival in American history. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1287–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (1988). British historical statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. (1885). A history of constitutional reform in Great Britain and Ireland. Glasgow: Blackie and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History, 49, 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2006). A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. NBER Working Paper #12795.

  • Olson, M. (1963). Rapid growth as a destabilizing force. Journal of Economic History, 23, 529–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87, 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. A., & Wetherell, C. (1995). The great reform act of 1832 and the political modernization of England. American Historical Review, 100, 411–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, E., & Siourounis, G. (2008). Democratisation and growth. Economic Journal, 118, 1520–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallings, M., & Thrasher, M. (2007). British electoral facts 1832–2006. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R. (2007). The politics of reform and the making of the second reform act, 1848–1867. Historical Journal, 50, 571–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, M., & Williams, J. (1977). Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G. W. (1981). Using financial data to measure the effects of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 24, 121–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, C. (1915). Electoral reform in England and Wales: the development and operation of the parliamentary franchise. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. B. (1966). The making of the second reform bill. Aldershot: Gregg Revivals [1992 reprint].

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. A. (1925). The House of Commons, 1832–1867: a functional analysis. Economica, 13, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. A., & Hickson, C. R. (2001). Ideology and the evolution of vital economic institutions: guilds, the gold standard, and modern international cooperation. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, G. M. (1937). British history in the nineteenth century and after. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. D. (2009). Wider share ownership?: investors in English bank shares, 1826–1900. Economic History Review, 62, 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. American Political Science Review, 91, 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. G. (1970). Democracy and reform 1815–1885. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, I. X. (2007). Economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 74–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, J.D., Zhan, W. Property rights and competing for the affections of Demos: the impact of the 1867 Reform Act on stock prices. Public Choice 150, 609–631 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9719-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9719-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation