Skip to main content
Log in

Government growth and private contributions to charity

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We exploit the time-series properties of charitable giving to provide additional insights into the relationship between charitable contributions and government spending. Cointegration tests reveal a significant long-run relationship between several categories of charitable giving and government spending. Granger causality tests provide evidence on the short-run giving and spending relationship. Evidence suggests that charitable contributions to education respond quite differently to state and local government education expenditures versus federal government expenditures. We argue that the government spending and charitable giving relationship depends on the source of government revenue, how this revenue is used, and the rational ignorance of private donors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, B. A., & Schmitz, M. D. (1978). The crowding-out effect of governmental transfers on private charitable contributions. Public Choice, 33(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, B. A., & Schmitz, M. D. (1984). The crowding-out effect of governmental transfers on private charitable contributions: cross-section evidence. National Tax Journal, 37(4), 563–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public-goods: a theory of warm glow giving. Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (2006). Philanthropy. In S.-C. Kolm & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, part 1 (pp. 1201–1269). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., & Payne, A. A. (2003). Do government grants to private charities crowd out giving or fund-raising? American Economic Review, 93(3), 792–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auten, G. E., Seig, H., & Clotfelter, C. T. (2002). Charitable giving, income, and taxes: an analysis of panel data. American Economic Review, 92(1), 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E., & Lindsay, M. (1994). Does the Government free ride? Journal of Law and Economics, 37(1), 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. D., Chinloy, P., & Jud, G. D. (2004). Real estate versus financial wealth in consumption. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29(3), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C. (1997). Economic strategies for orchestras. Evanston: Symphony Orchestra Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C. (2000a). Is there a dark side to government support for nonprofits? Public Administration Review, 60(2), 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C. (2000b). Public subsidies and charitable giving: crowding out, crowding in, or both? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(3), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C. (2003). Do government subsidies to nonprofits crowd out donations or donors? Public Finance Review, 31(2), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C. (2006). Who really cares: the surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1967). Public finance in democratic process. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. D. (2001). Rational ignorance, rational voter expectations, and public policy: a discrete informational foundation for fiscal illusion. Public Choice, 107(1–2), 35–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, K. M., & Devlin, R. A. (1996). Volunteerism and crowding out: Canadian econometric evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(1), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., & Johnson, R. M. (2005). An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1543–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. (1991). Co-integrated economic time series: an overview with new results. In R. Engle & C. Granger (Eds.), Long-run economic relationships: readings in cointegration. London: Oxford University Press. (Chap. 12)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giving USA Foundation (2006). Giving USA 2006 (The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2005).

  • Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1987). Crises and leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. G. (2005). Government growth in the twenty-first century. Public Choice, 124(1–2), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P. N., & Luksetich, W. A. (1999). The relationship among funding sources for art and history museums. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59(6), 1551–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. R. (1983). Aid to charities. International Journal of Social Economics, 10(2), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, J., Posnett, J., & Sandler, T. (1995). Charity donations in the UK: new evidence based on panel data. Journal of Public Economics, 56(2), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, B. R. (1989). An accurate measure of the crowd-out effect, income effect, and price effect for charitable contributions. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1197–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, L. B., & Steinberg, R. (1990). Joint crowdout: an empirical study of the impact of federal grants on state government expenditures and charitable donations (NBER Working Paper #3226).

  • Ng, S., & Perron, P. (2001). Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69(6), 1519–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. (1988). On the nature and measurement of fiscal illusion: A survey. In G. Brennan et al. (Eds.), Taxation and fiscal federalism: essays in honour of Russell Mathews. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. A. (1998). Does the government crowd-out private donations? New evidence from a sample of nonprofit firms. Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, J. (1985). Does government spending crowd-out charitable contributions? National Tax Journal, 38(4), 535–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. (1987). Voluntary donations and public expenditures in a federal system. American Economic Review, 77(1), 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Garrett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrett, T., Rhine, R. Government growth and private contributions to charity. Public Choice 143, 103–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9492-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9492-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation