Skip to main content
Log in

Free-riding on rent seeking—an empirical analysis

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 15 July 2009

Abstract

The Common Agricultural Policy is modelled as a club good providing the European Union (EU) farmer with financial benefits. We build an economic model which explains how much farmers in individual EU countries invest in rent-seeking activities in order to test for free-riding behaviour on lobbying costs. For our investigation we group the EU member countries by farm structure, and the type of benefit received. We explain the fees paid by farmers for lobbying by other countries’ fees, political variables, and country and regional agricultural characteristics. The model shows that some member countries free ride on others suggesting a form of policy path dependency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. (1987). Interest groups, campaign contributions and probabilistic voting. Public Choice, 54, 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. (1981). Simultaneous equations with error components. Journal of Econometrics, 17, 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. (1984). Short and long run effects in pooled models. International Economic Review, 25, 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd edn.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylis, K., & Furtan, H. (2003). Free-riding on federalism: trade protection and the Canadian dairy industry. Canadian Public Policy, 29(2), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Keeter, P. E., Clarke, G. R., Walsh, P., & Groff, A. (2007). Database of political institutions (2005). Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundel, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 11–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calzolari, G., & Immordino, G. (2005). Hormone beef, chlorinated chicken and international trade. European Economic Review, 49, 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. R. A., & Jones, A. (1999). From policy insider to policy outcast? Comité des Organisations Professionnelles Agricoles, EU policymaking, and the EU’s ‘agri-environment’ regulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17, 637–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. D., & Tangermann, S. (1999). The 1992 CAP reform, the Uruguay round and the commission: conceptualizing linked policy games. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(3), 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. D., Hillman, A. L., & Konrad, K. A. (2008). 40 years of research on rent seeking (Volumes I and II). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • COPA (2007). COPA: The dynamic force of European farmers. About COPA – Objectives. Available online at: http://copa-cogeca.be.en/copa_objectifs.asp.

  • Daugbjerg, C., & Swinbank, A. (2007). The politics of CAP reform: trade negotiations, institutional settings and blame avoidance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gorter, H., & Swinnen, J. (2002). Political economy of agricultural policy. In: Gardner, B. L. & Rausser, G. C. (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural economics, Volume 2B, agricultural and food policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, B., & Visser, J. (2000). The societies of Europe—trade unions in western Europe since 1945. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G., & Spence, D. (1994). The Commission in perspective. In: Edwards, G., & Spence, D. (Eds.), The European Commission (1st ed.) Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (2002). The European Commission – the evolving EU executive. ARENA Working Papers WP 02/30. Centre for European Studies, Oslo/Norway: University of Oslo.

  • Elliot, M., & Heath, A. (2000). The failure of CAP reform: a public choice analysis. Journal of Economic Affairs, 2, 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge/Princeton: Polity Press/Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijk, A., & Myles, J. (2003). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006). Allocation of 2005 EU expenditure by member state. http://ec.europa.eu/budget/documents/revenueexpenditureen.htm.

  • EU Commission (various years). Agriculture in the European Union—statistical and economic information. Brussels: EU Commission.

  • Flowers, M. R. (1987). Rent seeking and rent dissipation: a critical view. Cato Journal, 7, 431–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1996). Rent dissipation, free riding and trade policy. European Economic Review, 40, 793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. S., Lind, K. M., & Zobbe, H. (2007). Enlargements of the European Union and agricultural policy reform. Conference paper from the conference: Agricultural Policy Changes: Canada, EU and the World Trade Organisation, 13–15 September 2007, University of Victoria, Canada.

  • Kay, A. (2003). Path dependency and the CAP. Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1992). Interessen und integration. Die rolle organisierter interessen im westeuropaischen integrationsprozess. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 33, 81–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehman, E., Quenel, F. N., & Babb, E. M. (1996). Free-rider effects in rent-seeking groups competing for public goods. Public Choice, 86, 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludema, R. D., & Mayda, A. M. (2006). Do countries free ride on MFN? Washington: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Nedergaard, P. (2005). Organiseringen af den Europæiske Union, bureaukrater og institutioner: EU-forvaltningens effektivitet og legitimitet (4th ed.) Copenhagen: Handelshøjskolens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedergaard, P. (2006). Market failures and government failures: A theoretical model of the common agricultural policy. Public Choice, 127, 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., & Zeckhauser, R. (1966). An economic theory of alliances. Review of Economics and Statistics, 48, 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappi, F. U., & Henning, H. C. A. (1999). Organization of influence on the EC’s common agricultural policy: A network approach. European Journal of Political Research, 36, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palda, F. (2002). Interest groups: a survey of public choice thinking. EconWPA Public Economics: No. 0209006.

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economies: explaining economic policy. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & King, D. S. (2005). The politics of path dependency: political conflict in historical institutionalism. The Journal of Politics, 67, 1275–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. (1975). The social costs of monopoly and regulation. The Journal of Political Economy, 83, 807–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. K., & Schneider, F. (2004). The encyclopedia of public choice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T., & Hartley, K. (2001). Economics of alliances: the lessons for collective action. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 869–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 2, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen, J., & van der Zee, F. A. (1993). The political economy of agricultural policies: a survey. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 20, 261–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. The Western Economic Journal, 5, 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In: Buchanan, E. (Ed.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A & M University Press, pp. 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-ERS (2007). Foreign agricultural trade data. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FATUS/.

  • World Bank (2006). World development indicators. CD ROM. Washington, USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Sauer.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9474-3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furtom, H., Sauer, J. & Jensen, M.S. Free-riding on rent seeking—an empirical analysis. Public Choice 140, 479–500 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9406-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9406-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation