Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bounded learning-by-doing and sources of firm level productivity growth in colombian food manufacturing industry

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper models the bounded learning concept with the learning progress function characterized by the degree of efficiency and the specification of the learning progress as a logistic function capturing both the slow start-up and the limit in learning progress. We differentiate learning efficiency from the technical efficiency. The endogeneity corrected stochastic frontier model is then used to decompose the factor productivity growth into components associated with technological change, technical efficiency, scale, and learning. This productivity growth decomposition provides useful information and policy level insight in firm-level productivity analysis. Empirical results based on plant-level panel data on the Colombian food manufacturing industry for the period 1982–1998 suggest that productivity growth not only stems from technical progress, technical efficiency change, and scale but also from significant learning effect. The relative importance of the productivity growth components provides perspective for efficient resource allocation within the firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In fact, η is a firm-specific component that can vary over time and can reflect changes in the rate of learning. But one should not necessarily exclude the prospect of firm’s unlearning or forgetting.

  2. The differential equation representing the learning progress function of a general firm (with learning inefficiency) is \(\frac{{d{A_1}}}{{dV}} = \alpha A - \frac{\alpha }{{\bar a}}{A^2} - \eta \alpha A\), and for the best practice firm is \(\frac{{d{A_2}}}{{dV}} = \alpha A - \frac{\alpha }{{\bar a}}{A^2}\). The difference is\(\frac{d}{{dV}}\left( {{A_1} - {A_2}} \right) = - \eta \alpha A\). since A > 0, η ∈ [0, 1) and α > 0, the above derivative is always negative which proves that the function of the general firm will always be below that of the best practice firm for any value of η ∈ [0, 1).

  3. Instantaneous learning rate α and learning inefficiency η can be estimated from this residual by representing (3) as \(\frac{{d\hat A}}{{dV}} = \alpha \hat A - \frac{\alpha }{{\bar a}}{\hat A^2} - \eta \alpha \hat A\). Using the discrete analog of the derivative term \(\frac{{d\hat A}}{{dV}} = \frac{{{{\hat A}_{it}} - {{\hat A}_{it - 1}}}}{{{{\hat y}_{it}}}}\), (3) can be written as \(\frac{{d{{\hat A}_{it}}}}{{{{\hat y}_{it}}}} = {\sum} {\left( {{\alpha _i} - {\eta _i}{\alpha _i}} \right){D_i}{{\hat A}_{it - 1}} - {\sum} {{\alpha _i}{D_i}\hat A_{it - 1}^2} } + {\varepsilon _{it}}\), where D i is a dummy variable for individual firm in a sector. Using this specification instantaneous learning rate and learning inefficiency parameters can be estimated by using the nonlinear least square technique.

References

  • Ackerberg D, Caves K, Frazer G (2006) Structural identification of production functions. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 38349, posted 25 April 2012. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38349/

  • Ackerberg D, Lanier Benkard C, Berry S, Pakes A (2007) Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. Handb Econom Elsevier 6:4171–4276

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler P, Clark K (1991) Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process. Manag Sci 37(3):267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L (1999) Organizational learning: creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

  • Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Manag Sci 36(2):140–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29(3):155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahk B, Gort M (1993) Decomposing learning by doing in new plants. J Polit Econ 101(4):561–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baloff N (1966) The learning curve—some controversial issues. J Ind Econ 14(3):275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baloff N (1971) Extension of the learning curve—some empirical results. Oper Res Q 22(4):329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese G, Coelli T (1992) Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. J Prod Anal 3(1):153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer P (1990) Decomposing TFP growth in the presence of cost inefficiency, nonconstant returns to scale, and technological progress. J Prod Anal 1(4):287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkard C (2000) Learning and forgetting: the dynamics of aircraft production. Am Econ Rev 90(4):1034–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brachet T, David G (2011) On the determinants of organizational forgetting. Am Econ J Microecon 3(3):100–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr G (1946) Peacetime cost estimating requires new learning curves. Aviation 45(4):220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran E (1960) New concepts of the learning curve. J Ind Eng 11(4):317–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran E, Sherman H (1982) Predicting new product labour hours. Int J Prod Res 20(4):517–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway R, Schultz A (1959) The manufacturing progress function. J Ind Eng 10(1):39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises. Manag Sci 41(11):1750–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny M, Fuss M, Waverman L (1981) The measurement and interpretation of total factor productivity in regulated industries, with an application to Canadian telecommunications. In: T. G. Cowing & R. E. Stevenson (eds) Productivity measurement in regulated industries, Academic Press, New York

  • Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper Res 44(1):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1995). Production functions: the search for identification. NBER working paper 5067

  • Irwin D, Klenow P (1994) Learning-by-doing spillovers in the semiconductor industry. J Polit Econ 102(6):1200–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarmin R (1994) Learning by doing and competition in the early rayon industry. Rand J Econ 25(3):441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic B, Nyarko Y (1995) A Bayesian learning model fitted to a variety of empirical learning curves. Brook Pap Econ Act Microecon 1:247–305

  • Kim S, Han G (2001) A decomposition of total factor productivity growth in Korean manufacturing industries: a stochastic frontier approach. J Prod Anal 16(3):269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC (2000) Estimation and decomposition of productivity change when production is not efficient: a panel data approach. Econ Rev 19(4):425–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, and Lovell CAK (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Leibenstein H (1966) Allocative efficiency vs.” X-efficiency”. Am Econ Rev 56(3):392–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H (1978) X-inefficiency Xists: Reply to an Xorcist. Am Econ Rev 68(1):203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H (1979) A branch of economics is missing: micro-micro theory. J Econ Lit 17(2):477–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70(2):317–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M (1984) The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. Rand J Econ 15(2):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas Jr R (1993) Making a miracle. Econometrica 61(2):251–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luh Y, Stefanou S (1993) Learning-by-doing and the sources of productivity growth: a dynamic model with application to US agriculture. J Prod Anal 4(4):353–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F (1992) Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Econ J 102(413):845–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak J, Andrews W (1944) Random simultaneous equations and the theory of production. Econometrica 12(3):143–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak Y (1996) Production function estimation: reviving the primal. Econometrica 64(2):431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimizu M, Page JM (1982) Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia, 1965–1978. Econ J 92(368):920–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oi WY (1967) The neoclassical foundations of progress function. Econ J 77(307):579–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olley G, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapping L (1965) Learning and World War II production functions. Rev Econ Stat 47(1):81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1972) Learning by experience as joint production. Q J Econ 86(3):366–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shee A, Stefanou SE (2015) Endogeneity corrected stochastic production frontier and technical efficiency. Am J Agric Econ 97(3):939–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanou SE, Saxena S (1988) Education, experience, and allocative efficiency: a dual approach. Am J Agric Econ 70(2):338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler G (1976) The xistence of X-efficiency. Am Econ Rev 66(1):213–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson P (2001) How much did the liberty shipbuilders learn? New evidence for an old case study. J Polit Econ 109(1):103–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson P (2007) How much did the Liberty shipbuilders forget? Manag Sci 53(6):908–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton R, Thompson P (2001) Learning from experience and learning from others: an exploration of learning and spillovers in wartime shipbuilding. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1350–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1993) Invention and bounded learning by doing. J Polit Econ 101(3):443–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledegments

The authors thank the associate editor, two anonymous referees, and Cindy Cox for helpful comments. We also thank Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadistica (DANE) for providing access to the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apurba Shee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Appendices

Appendix 1

To solve the differential equation governing the learning progress for a general firm

$$\begin{array}{c}\frac{{dA}}{{dV}} = \alpha A - \frac{\alpha }{{\bar a}}{A^2} - \eta A\\ \frac{{dA}}{{dV}} = \frac{\alpha }{{\bar a}}A\left( {\left( {\alpha - \eta } \right){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }} - A} \right)\end{array}$$

Using separation of variables we get,\({\int} {\frac{{dA}}{{A\left( {\left( {\alpha - \eta } \right){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }} - A} \right)}} = {\int} {\frac{\alpha }{{\bar a}}dV} } + c\)

Partial fraction decomposition, \({\frac{1} {\left( \alpha - \eta \right) {\frac{\bar a}{\alpha}} }} {\int} \left({\frac{1}{A}}- {\frac{1}{\left(\alpha-\eta \right){\frac{\bar a}{\alpha}}-A}}\right)dA={\frac{\alpha}{\bar a}}V+c\)

$$\begin{array}{l}\ln A - \ln \left( {(\alpha - \eta ){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }} - A} \right) = (\alpha - \eta )V + c\\ \frac{A}{{(\alpha - \eta ){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }} - A}} = k{e^{(\alpha - \eta )V}}\\ \end{array}$$

Initial condition, at V = 0, \(A = {a_0}\) hence \(k = \frac{{{a_0}}}{{(\alpha - \eta ){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }} - {a_0}}}\)

Putting the value of k we write, \((\alpha - \eta ){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }}{a_0}{e^{(\alpha - \eta )V}} - {a_0}A{e^{(\alpha - \eta )V}} = A\left( {(\alpha - \eta ){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }} - {a_0}} \right)\)

$$A\left( V \right) = \frac{{\left( {\alpha - \eta } \right){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }}}}{{1 + \frac{{\left( {\alpha - \eta } \right){\textstyle{{\bar a} \over \alpha }} - {a_0}}}{{{a_0}}}{\mathrm{exp}}\left\{ { - \left( {\alpha - \eta } \right)V} \right\}}}$$

Substituting η by ηα the differential equation becomes \(\frac{{dA}}{{dV}} = \alpha A - \frac{\alpha }{{\bar a}}{A^2} - \eta \alpha A\) and the solution becomes \(A\left( V_{t} \right) = \frac{{\left( {1 - \eta } \right)}{\bar \alpha} } {{1 + \frac{{\left( {1 - \eta } \right){\bar a} - {a_0} } } {a_0}}e^{-\alpha\left( l-\eta \right) V}} \)

Appendix 2

Simulated plots of the learning progress function

3

Fig. 3
figure 3

Simulated learning progress with different level of learning inefficiency

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shee, A., Stefanou, S.E. Bounded learning-by-doing and sources of firm level productivity growth in colombian food manufacturing industry. J Prod Anal 46, 185–197 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0481-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0481-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation