Abstract
The number of conventionally fuelled motor vehicles in use is increasing worldwide despite warnings about finite fossil fuel and the detrimental impacts of burning such fuels. While electric vehicles, the subject of much research, generate far less emissions and offer the potential for power from renewable sources, they are yet to significantly penetrate the market. Tangible barriers such as price and vehicle range still exist, but consumer attitudes also drive behaviour. This paper examines attributes in a framework relatively new to transportation and energy policy; best–worst scaling. This method is widely considered an improvement over traditional methods of eliciting attitudes and beliefs, where respondents select attitudes they find best or worst from a set of attitudinal statements. To avoid potential endogeneity bias, we jointly model attitudes and choice for the first time with best–worst data. It is found that energy crisis, air quality and climate change concerns influence behaviour with respect to vehicle range and that travel behaviour change and forms of government incentives are needed influences on behaviour with respect to vehicle emissions. It is argued that correctly modelling attitudes reduces the error term of the vehicle choice model and provides policy makers with an improved lens for assessing behaviour. Additionally, the methods described within can easily be adapted to other policy scenarios.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This paper is a revision of Beck et al. (2014), an unpublished conference presentation.
References
ABS: Motor Vehicle Census, Australia, 31 Jan 2013, cat. no. 9309.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/9309.0 (2013). Accessed 28 July 2013
ABS: 2011 Census Data. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/data (2014). Accessed 13 Aug 2015
Archtnicht, M., Buhler, G., Hermeling, C.: The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D 17, 262–269 (2011)
Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Dean, M.: Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: the role of affective and moral attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 50(3), 443–454 (2008)
Auger, P., Devinney, T.M., Louviere, J.J.: Using best–worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries. J. Bus. Ethics 70, 299–326 (2007)
Axsen, J., Kurani, K.S., Burke, A.: Are batteries ready for plug-in hybrid buyers? Transp. Policy 17(3), 173–182 (2010)
Baptista, P., Rolim, C., Silva, C.: Plug-in vehicle acceptance and probable utilization behaviour. J. Transp. Technol. 2, 67–74 (2011)
Beck, M.J., Rose, J.M., Hensher, D.A.: Environmental attitudes and emissions charging: an example of policy implications for vehicle choice. Transp. Res. Part A 50, 171–182 (2013)
Beck, M.J., Rose, J.M., Greaves, S.P.: I can’t believe your attitude: eliciting attitudes and beliefs through best–worst scaling and jointly estimating their impact on electric vehicle choice. In: 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board TRB 2014, Washington D.C., United States, 16 January 2014
Beggs, S., Cardell, S.: Choice of smallest car by multi-vehicle households and the demand for electric vehicles. Transp. Res. 14(5), 298–404 (1980)
Beggs, S., Cardell, S., Hausman, J.: Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. J. Econom. 16, 1–19 (1981)
Bei, L., Simpson, E.: The determinants of consumers’ purchase decisions for recycled products: an application of acquisition-transaction utility theory. Adv. Consum. Res. 22(1), 257–261 (1995)
Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Gärling, T., Gopinath, D., Walker, J., Bolduc, D., Börsch-Supan, A., Delquié, P., Larichev, O., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A., Rao, V.: Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Mark. Lett. 10(3), 187–203 (1999)
Bierlaire, M.: BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland (2003)
Brownstone, D., Bunch, D.S., Golob, T.F., Ren, W.: A transaction choice model for forecasting demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Res. Transp. Econ. 4, 97–129 (1996)
Bunch, D.S., Bradley, M., Golob, T.F., Kitamura, R., Occhiuzzo, G.P.: Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: a discrete-choice stated preference pilot project. Transp. Res. Part A 27(3), 237–253 (1993)
Caulfield, B., Farrell, S., McMahon, B.: Examining individuals preferences for hybrid electric and alternatively fuelled vehicles. Transp. Policy 17(6), 381–387 (2010)
Cobb, J.: December 2012 Dashboard. HybridCars.com and Baum & Associates. http://www.hybridcars.com/december-2012-dashboard (2013). Accessed 14 Jan 2013
Cohen, S. H., Markowitz, P.: Renewing market segmentation: some new tools to correct old problems. In: ESOMAR 2002 Congress Proceedings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2002)
Cohen, S.H., Neira, L.: Measuring preference for product benefits across countries: overcoming scale usage bias with maximum difference scaling. In: ESOMAR 2002 Congress Proceedings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2003)
Craig, C.S., Douglas, S.P.: International Marketing Research. Wiley, New York (2000)
DCCEE: Australian National Greenhouse Accounts: National Inventory Report 2010, vol. 1. Department of Climate Change. http://www.climatechange.gov.au/emissions (2012). Accessed 29 July 2013
De Palma, A., Kilani, K., Laffond, G.: Best and worst choices. halshs-00825656 Working Paper Series (2013)
Diamond, D.: The impact of government incentives for hybrid-electric vehicles: evidence from U.S. Energy Policy 37(3), 972–983 (2009)
Dyachenko, T., Walker Reczek, R., Allenby, G.M.: Models of sequential evaluation in best–worst choice tasks. Mark. Sci. 33(6), 828–848 (2014)
Eberle, U., von Helmolt, R.: Sustainable transportation based on electric vehicle concepts: a brief overview. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 689–699 (2010)
Eberle, U., Mullera, B., von Helmolt, R.: Fuel cell electric vehicles and hydrogen infrastructure: status 2012. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8780–8798 (2012)
EEA: Annual European Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2006 and Inventory Report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen (2008)
Egbue, O., Long, S.: Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48, 717–729 (2012)
EPA: Fast Facts U.S. Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions, United States, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, EPA-420-F-12-063 (2012)
Finn, A., Louviere, J.J.: Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: the case of food safety. J. Pub. Policy Mark. 11(2), 12–25 (1992)
Flynn, T.N., Louviere, J.J., Peters, T.J., Coast, J.: Estimating preferences for a dermatology consultation using Best-Worst Scaling: Comparison of various methods of analysis. BMC Med. Res. Methodol 8(1), 76 (2008)
Franke, T., Neumann, I., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., Krems, J.F.: Experiencing range in an electric vehicle: understanding psychological barriers. Appl. Psychol. 61(3), 368–391 (2012)
Gardner, J, Quezada, G., Paevere, P.: CSIRO Electric Driveway Project: Social Study on Attitudes, Drivers and Barriers to the Uptake of Electric Vehicles, Report Number EP113815. www.electricdriveway.com.au (2011)
Hensher, D.A.: Functional measurements, individual preferences and discrete choice modeling: theory and application. J. Econom. Psychol. 2, 323–335 (1982)
Hess, S.: Rethinking heterogeneity: the role of attitudes, decision rules and data processing strategies. Transp. Lett. 4(2), 105–113 (2012)
Hess, S., Fowler, M., Adler, T., Bahreinian, A.: A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study. Transportation 39(3), 593–625 (2012)
Hidrue, M.K., Parsons, G.R., Kempton, W., Gardner, M.P.: Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 33(3), 686–705 (2011)
IEA: Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 (ETP2012). International Energy Agency, Paris (2012)
Lee, J.A., Soutar, G., Louviere, J.J.: The best–worst scaling approach: an alternative to Schwartz’s values survey. J. Pers. Assess. 90(4), 335–347 (2008)
Lee, J.A., Soutar, G.N., Louviere, J.J.: Measuring values using best–worst scaling: the LOV example. Psychol. Mark. 24(12), 1043–1058 (2007)
Maness, M., Cirillo, C.: Measuring future vehicle preferences: stated preference survey approach with dynamic attributes and multiyear time frame. Transp. Res. Rec. 2285, 100–109 (2012)
Manski, C.: Measuring expectations. Econometrica 72(5), 1329–1376 (2004)
Marley, A.A.J: The best–worst method for the study of preferences: theory and application. In: CenSoC Working Paper No. 09-004. http://www.censoc.uts.edu.au/researchoutput/marley-berlin-paper-09-05-12.pdf (2009). Accessed 29 July 2013
Marley, A.A.J., Flynn, T.N., Louviere, J.J.: Probabilistic models of set-dependent and attribute-level best–worst choice. J. Math. Psychol. 52(5), 281–296 (2008)
Marley, A.A.J., Louviere, J.J.: Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choices. J. Math. Psychol. 49(6), 464–480 (2005)
Mielby, I.H., Edelenbos, M., Thybo, A.: A Comparison of rating, best–worst scaling, and adolescents’ real choices of snacks. Food Qual. Prefer. 25(2), 140–147 (2012)
Mowen, J.C.: Consumer Behaviour, 3rd edn, pp. 151–182. Macmillian Publishing Company, New York (1993). (Chapter 7)
OICA: 2012 Production Statistics. International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers. http://oica.net/category/production-statistics/ (2013). Accessed 29 July 2013
Ozaki, R., Sevastyanova, K.: Going hybrid: an analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy 39(5), 2217–2227 (2011)
Paulhus, D.L.: Measurement and control of response bias. In: Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R., Wrightsman, L.S. (eds.) Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, pp. 17–59. Academic Press, New York (1991)
Rose, J.M.: Interpreting discrete choice models based on best–worst data: a matter of framing. Transportation Research Board, Annual Meeting, January 12–16, Washington D.C. (2014)
Rose, J.M., Bliemer, M.C.J., Hensher, D.A., Collins, A.C.: Designing efficient stated choice experiments involving respondent based reference alternatives. Transp. Res. Part B 42(4), 395–406 (2008)
Scarpa, R., Notaro, S., Louviere, J., Raffaelli, R.: Exploring scale effects of best/worst rank ordered choice data to estimate benefits of tourism in alpine grazing commons. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 93(3), 813–828 (2011)
Sperling, D., Gordon, D.: Two Billion Cars: Driving Toward Sustainability. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)
Steenkamp, J.-B., Baumgartner, H.: Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 25(1), 78–90 (1998)
Train, K.: The potential market for non-gasoline-powered vehicles. Transp. Res. 14(5), 405–414 (1980)
Ziegler, A.: Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: a discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transp. Res. Part A 46(8), 1372–1385 (2012)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank two anonymous referees whose comments have improved the content of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beck, M.J., Rose, J.M. & Greaves, S.P. I can’t believe your attitude: a joint estimation of best worst attitudes and electric vehicle choice. Transportation 44, 753–772 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9675-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9675-9