Abstract
Studies of neighborhoods can benefit from data and theoretical frameworks that allow them to examine the differences between neighborhoods and neighbors. Without this distinction, it is unclear if it is characteristics of the people or the place that are associated with individual outcomes. Using data from the Chitwan Valley Family Study, I explore the differences between neighbors and neighborhoods and their associations with marriage timing. I hypothesize three mechanisms whereby neighbors influence individuals: information sharing, social modeling, and sanctions and rewards among a close primary residential group. I explore three domains in which these mechanisms are likely to operate: education, media consumption, and attitudes. Results indicate that when neighbors have attitudes favoring later marriage and being single, marriage rates decrease, even when controlling for measures that describe the neighborhood’s access to important resources in the form of institutions and services.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces, 75, 1149–1182.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Akers, R. L., Krohn M. D., Lanza-Kaduce L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655.
Allison, P. D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 61–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Axinn, W. G. (1993). The effects of children’s schooling on fertility limitation. Population Studies, 47, 481–493.
Axinn, W. G., & Barber, J. S. (2001). Mass education and fertility transition. American Sociological Review, 66, 481–505.
Axinn, W. G., Barber, J. S., & Ghimire, D. J. (1997). The neighborhood history calendar: A data collection method designed for dynamic multilevel modeling. Sociological Methodology, 27, 355–392.
Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1992). The influence of parental resources on the timing of the transition to marriage. Social Science Research, 21, 261–285.
Axinn, W. G., & Yabiku, S. T. (2001). Social change, the social organization of families, and fertility limitation. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1219–1261.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Barber, J. S. (2004). Community social context and individualistic attitudes toward marriage. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(3), 236–256.
Barber, J. S., & Axinn, W. G. (1998). The impact of parental pressure for grandchildren on young people’s entry into cohabitation and marriage. Population Studies, 52, 129–144.
Barber, J. S., Murphy, S., Axinn, W. G., & Maples, J. (2000). Discrete-time multilevel hazards analysis. Sociological Methodology, 30, 201–235.
Barber, J. S., Pearce, L. D., Chaudhury, I., & Gurung, S. (2002). Voluntary associations and fertility limitation. Social Forces, 80(4), 1269–1301.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bennett, J. B., & Lehman, W. E. K. (1999). Employee exposure to coworker substance use and negative consequences: The moderating effects of work group membership. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 307–322.
Bennett, L. (1983). Dangerous wives and sacred sisters: Social and symbolic roles of high caste women in Nepal. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bernardi, L. (2003). Channels of social influence on reproduction. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5–6), 527–555.
Blalock, H. M. (1984). Contextual-effects models: Theoretical and methodological issues. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 353–372.
Blossfeld, H.-P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 143–168.
Boardman, J. D., Powers, D. A., Padilla, Y. C., & Hummer, R. A. (2002). Low birth weight, social factors, and developmental outcomes among children in the United States. Demography, 39, 353–368.
Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639–682.
Brewster, K. L. (1994). Neighborhood context and the transition to sexual activity among young black women. Demography, 31, 603–614.
Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395.
Burgess, E. W. (1967). Can neighborhood work have a scientific basis? In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 142–155). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. New York: Academic.
Carlstein, T. (1982). Time resources, society, and ecology: On the capacity for human interaction in space and time. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
Cooley, C. H. (1909). Social organization. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Crane, J. (1991). The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1226–1259.
Degraff, D. S., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Guilkey, D. K. (1997). Community-level determinants of contraceptive use in the Philippines: A structural analysis. Demography, 34, 385–398.
Duncan, G. J., Connell, J. P., & Klebanov, P. K. (1997). Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating causal effects of neighborhoods, family conditions on individual development. In J. Brooks-Gunn, G. J. Duncan, & J. L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty, volume 1: Context and consequences for children (pp. 219–250). New York: Russell Sage.
Erbring, L., & Young, A. A. (1979). Individuals and social structure: Contextual effects as endogenous feedback. Sociological Methods and Research, 7, 396–430.
Garner, C. L., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1991). Neighborhood effects on educational attainment: A multilevel analysis. Sociology of Education, 64, 251–262.
Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1986). Sex differences in the entry into marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 91–109.
Goode, W. J. (1970). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Free.
Greenwell, L., Leibowitz, A., & Klerman, J. A. (1998). Welfare background, attitudes, and employment among new mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 175–193.
Guneratne, A. (1996). The tax man cometh: The impact of revenue collection on subsistence strategies in Chitwan Tharu society. Studies in Nepali History and Society, 1(1), 5–35.
Heimer, K., & Matsueda, R. L. (1994). Role-taking, role commitment, and delinquency: A theory of differential social control. American Sociological Review, 59, 365–390.
Hogan, D. P., & Kitagawa, E. M. (1985). The impact of social status, family structure, and neighborhood on the fertility of black adolescents. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 825–855.
Homans, G. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace.
House, J. S., & Mortimer, J. (1990). Social structure and the individual: Emerging themes and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 71–80.
Jacoby, H. C. (2000). Access to markets and the benefits of rural roads. Economic Journal, 110, 713–737.
Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). Residential segregation, job proximity, and black job opportunities. In L. E. Lynn Jr., &M. M. McGreary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 187–222). Washington: National Academic.
Kohn, M. L., Slomczynski, K. M., Janicka, D., Khmelko, V., Mach, B. W., Paniotto, V., et al. (1997). Social structure and personality under conditions of radical social change: A comparative analysis of Poland and Ukraine. American Sociological Review, 62, 614–638.
Macy, M. W., & Flache, A. (1995). Beyond rationality in models of choice. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 73–91.
Marini, M. M. (1980). Sex differences in the process of occupational attainment: A closer look. Social Science Research, 9, 307–361.
Massey, D. S., & Espinosa, K. E. (1997). What’s driving Mexico–U.S. migration? A theoretical, empirical, and policy analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 939–999.
Mayer, S. E., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighborhoods: How much does it matter? Science, 243, 1441–1445.
McBroom, W. H., & Reed, F. W. (1992). Toward a reconceptualization of attitude-behavior consistency. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 205–216.
McKenzie, R. D. (1921). The neighborhood: A study of local life in the city of Columbus, Ohio. American Journal of Sociology, 27, 344–363.
McKenzie, R. D. (1968). The scope of human ecology. In A. H. Hawley (Ed.), Roderick D. McKenzie on human ecology (pp. 19–32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Montgomery, M. R., & Casterline, J. B. (1996). Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Population and Development Review, 22(Suppl.), 151–175.
Montgomery, M. R., Gragnolati, M., Burke, K. A., & Paredes, E. (2000). Measuring living standards with proxy variables. Demography, 37, 155–174.
Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517–559.
Petersen, T. (1991). Time-aggregation bias in continuous-time hazard-rate models. Sociological Methodology, 21, 263–290.
Peterson, R. D., Krivo, L. J., & Harris, M. A. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 31–63.
Rankin, B. H., & Quane, J. M. (2000). Neighborhood poverty and the social isolation of inner-city African American families. Social Forces, 79, 139–164.
Raymo, J. M. (2003). Educational attainment and the transition to first marriage among Japanese women. Demography, 40(1), 83–103.
Reed, H. B., & Reed, M. J. (1968). Nepal in transition: Educational innovation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493–512.
Rosenfeld, R. A. (1980). Race and sex differences in career dynamics. American Sociological Review, 45(4), 583–609.
Sampson, R. J. (1991). Linking the micro- and macrolevel dimensions of community social organization. Social Forces, 70, 43–64.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processes and new directions for research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–651.
Sastry, N., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Adams, J., & Pebley, A. R. (2000). The design of a multilevel longitudinal survey of children, families, and communities: The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey. RAND Working Paper No. 00–18.
Schwartz, S. H., & Ames, R. E. (1977). Positive and negative referent others as sources of influence: A case of helping. Sociometry, 40, 12–21.
Shrestha, N. R., & Bhattarai, K. (2003). Historical dictionary of Nepal. Lanham: The Scarecrow.
South, S. J., & Baumer, E. P. (2000). Deciphering community and race effects on adolescent premarital childbearing. Social Forces, 78, 1379–1407.
Sprague, J. (1982). Is there a micro theory consistent with contextual analysis? In E. Ostrom (Ed.), Strategies of political inquiry (pp. 99–122). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Teachman, J., & Crowder, K. (2002). Multilevel models in family research: Some conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 280–294.
Thornton, A. (1991). The influence of parents’ marital history on the marital cohabitational experiences of children. American Journal of Sociology, 96(4), 868–894.
Thornton, A. (2001). The development paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38, 449–465.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, T. (1995). The influence of educational experiences on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762–774.
Thornton, A., & Fricke, T. E. (1987). Social change and the family: Comparative perspectives from the West, China, and South Asia. Sociological Forum, 2, 746–779.
Thornton, A., & Lin, H.-S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tienda, M. (1991). Poor people and poor places: Deciphering neighborhood effects of poverty outcomes. In J. Huber (Ed.), Macro–micro linkages in sociology (pp. 244–262). Newbury Park: Sage.
Upchurch, D. M., Aneshensel, C. S., Sucoff, C. A., & Levy-Storms, L. (1999). Neighborhood and family contexts of adolescent sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 920–933.
Vartanian, T. P. (1999). Childhood conditions and adult welfare use: Examining neighborhood and family factors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 225–237.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wirth, L. (1964). The scope and problems of the community. In A. J. Reiss Jr. (Ed.), Louis Wirth on cities and social life: Selected papers (pp. 165–177). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Yabiku, S. T. (2004). Marriage timing in Nepal: Organizational effects and individual mechanisms. Social Forces, 83, 559–586.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yabiku, S.T. Neighbors and neighborhoods: effects on marriage timing. Popul Res Policy Rev 25, 305–327 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-9006-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-9006-5