Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Demo-livelihoods theoretical framework: microdemographics mediating livelihoods over frontier stages in the Amazon

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sustainability of livelihoods and food security by small-scale colonists in the Amazon have been associated with the dynamics of land use and land cover as well as the ability of combining distinct sources of income and welfare. However, few studies have discussed theoretically how these changes co-evolve, over distinct stages of frontier development and for the same colonist cohort, with the composition and size of farm households. This paper, based on the revision of the extant literature, proposes a Demo-livelihoods theoretical framework that combines and synthetizes three theoretical approaches — the household and land use life cycle approach, the livelihoods and capabilities approach, and the revisited theory of multiphasic responses. The objective is to provide theoretical groundings for empirical studies that unveil how microdemographics (individual and farm household) cohort dynamics in frontier settings such as the Amazon mediate livelihoods (including land use) strategies over distinct development stages. It shows how demographic factors may be significant to define livelihoods at earlier frontier stages and release explanatory power at later stages, when market integration increases and households increasingly adopt diversified livelihoods. Furthermore, demographic dynamics at each frontier stage may be associated with distinct livelihood strategies, including mobility, land use, and deforestation, and thus define the extent and nature of settler´s welfare and food security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Based on Bebbington (1999), VanWey et al. (2013) suggest that livelihood trajectories change as a response to returns to farmers’ capital portfolio over frontier stages. Household decisions are also conditioned by the livelihood decisions of agents, the broad portfolio of assets controlled by the agents, the subjective and context-specific returns to different types of capital, and the evolving multidimensional context.

References

  • Aldrich, S. P., Walker, R. T., Arima, E. Y., Caldas, M. M., Browder, J. O., & Perz, S. (2006). Land‐cover and land‐use change in the Brazilian Amazon: Smallholders, ranchers, and frontier stratification. Economic Geography 82(3), 265–288. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00311.x

  • Andersen, L. E., Granger, C. W. J., Reis, E. J., Weinhold, D., & Wunder, S. (2002). The dynamics of deforestation and economic growth in the Brazilian Amazon. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. S., Biddlecom, A. E., & Axinn, W. G. (2003). Neighborhood social change and perceptions of environmental degradation. Population and Environment, 25, 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000015559.53819.ab

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, A. F. (2006). People, land, and context: Multi-scale dimensions of population mobility in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Ann Arbor, Michigan: ProQuest / UMI, 218.

  • Barbieri, A. F., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Pan, W. K. (2005). Farm household lifecycles and land use in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Environment, 27(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, A. F., Carr, D. L., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2009a). Migration within the frontier: The second generation colonization in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Research Policy Review, 28(3), 291–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, A. F., Guedes, G. R. & Santos, R. O. (2021). Land use systems and livelihoods in demographically heterogeneous frontier stages in the Amazon. Environmental Development 38, 100587. ISSN 2211–4645, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100587

  • Barbieri, A. F., Monte-Mór, R. L., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2009b). Towns in the jungle: Exploring linkages between rural-urban mobility, urbanization and development in the Amazon. In: A. de Sherbiniin A. Rahman, A. Barbieri, J.C. Fotso, Y.& Zhu, (Eds.), Urban population and environment dynamics in the developing world: Case studies and lessons learned. Paris: CICRED.

  • Barbieri, A. F., & Pan, W. K. (2013). People, land, and context: Multilevel determinants of off-farm employment in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Population, Space and Place, 19, 558–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, A. F., & Pan, W. K. (2022). Population dynamics and the environment: The demo-climatic transition. In: John F. May; Jack Goldstone (Eds.Org.), International handbook of population policies. 1ed.New York: Springer, 109–130.

  • Barbieri, A. F., Santos, R. O., & Guedes, G. R. (2014). The migration, environment and development nexus in the frontier: A review of the literature based on empirical evidences from the Brazilian Amazon. In: Determinants of International Migration Conference, Oxford.

  • Barros, J. V. S., Wong, L. R., & Barbieri, A. F. (2020). Comportamiento reproductivo y anticonceptivo de dos cohortes de mujeres de una región de frontera agrícola en la Amazonia brasileña. Notas De Población (CEPAL), 111, 189–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R. (1987). Population pressures and agricultural development in development countries: A conceptual framework and recent evidence. World Development, 15(2), 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R. (2002). Migration, population change, and the rural environment. Environment Change & Security Project Report, Summer, 2002(8), 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R. E., Barbieri, A. F., & Pan, W. K. (2004). Changes in population and land use over time in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Acta Amazonica, 34(4), 635–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R., & Geores, M. (1994). Population change and agricultural intensification in developing countries. In L. Aripe et al. (Eds.), Population and environment: Rethinking the debate. Westview Press.

  • Bilsborrow, R., & Okoth-Ogendo, H. (1992). Population-driven changes in land use in developing countries. Ambio, 21(1), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R. E., & Stupp, P. W. (1997). Demographic processes, land, and the environment in Guatemala. In A. R. Pebley & L. Rosero-Bixby (Eds.), Demographic diversity and change in the central American isthmus. Santa Monica, CA, RAND, 581–624.

  • Bremner, J., López-Carr, D., Suter, L., & Davis, J. (2010). Population, poverty, environment, and climate dynamics in the developing world. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 11(2), 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brondízio, E. S. (2008). The Amazonian Caboclo and the Açaí Palm: Forest farmers in the global market. New York Botanical Garden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E. S., McCracken, S. D., Moran, E. F., Siqueira, A. D., Nelson, D. R., & Rodrigues-Pedraza, C. (2002). The colonist footprint: Towards a conceptual framework of land use and deforestation trajectories among small farmers in the Amazonian Frontier. In C. Wood & R. Porro (Eds.), Deforestation and land use in the Amazon (pp. 133–171). Florida University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, J. O., & Godfrey, B. J. (1997). Rainforest cities: Urbanization, development, and globalization of the Brazilian Amazon. New York: Columbia University Press. Chapter, 10, 312–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, J. O., Pedlowski, M. A., & Summers, P. M. (2004). Land use patterns in the Brazilian Amazon: Comparative farm-level evidence from Rondônia. Human Ecology, 32(2), 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browder, J. O., Pedlowski, M. A., Walker, R., Wynne, R. H., Summers, P. M., Abad, A., Becerra-Cordoba, N., & Mil-Homens, J. (2008). Revisiting theories of frontier expansion in the Brazilian Amazon: A survey of the colonist farming population in Rondonia’s post-frontier, 1992–2002. World Development 36(8), 1469–1492. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X08000739

  • Bury, J. (2004). Livelihoods in transition: Transnational gold mining operations and local change in Cajamarca, Peru. Geographical Journal, 170, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.05042.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldas, M., Walker, R., Arima, E., Perz, S., Aldrich, S., & Simmons, C. (2007). Theorizing land cover and land use change: The peasant economy of Amazonian deforestation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(1), 86–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. L., Pan, W. K., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2006). Declining fertility on the frontier: The Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Environment, 28(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-007-0032-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, M. C., & Singer, B. H. (2012). Agricultural settlement and soil quality in the Brazilian Amazon. Population and Environment, 34(1), 22–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caviglia-Harris, J., Sills, E. et al. (2005). Migration and mobility on the Amazon frontier. Population and Environment, 1–32.

  • Caviglia-Harris, J., Sills, E., et al. (2013). Migration and mobility on the Amazon frontier. Population and Environment, 34(3), 338–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1991). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, IDS (Institute of Development Studies), UK, 33.

  • Collins, J. (1986). Smallholder settlement of tropical South America: The social causes of ecological destruction. Human Organization, 45(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, S. (2002). Migration, social capital, and the environment: Considering migrant selectivity and networks in relation to coastal systems. Population and Development Review, 28(Supplement), 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, A. (1999). Livelihoods and poverty: The role of migration – A critical review of migration literature. Journal of Development Studies, 36(2), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., & López-Carr, D. (2010). The effects of migrant remittances on population-environment dynamics in migrant origin areas: International migration, fertility, and consumption in highland Guatemala. Population and Environment, 32(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0128-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1963). The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index, 29(4), 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, Y., Deadman, P., Robinson, D., et al. (2017). Impacts of cash transfer programs on rural livelihoods: A case study in the Brazilian Amazon estuary. Human Ecology, 45, 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9934-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (1988). Peasant economies: Farm households and agrarian development. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (1992). Agricultural policies in developing countries (p. 357). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273p. ISBN: 0–19–829696–7, 0–19–829695–9.

  • Findley, Sally E. (1984). Colonist constraints, strategies and mobility: Recent trends in Latin American frontier zones. ILO World Employment Programme Research Population And Labour Policies Programme Working Paper No. 145. Available in: https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1984/84B09_427_engl.pdf. Access: April 6th, 2021.

  • Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience, 52(2), 43–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German, L. A. (2003). Historical contingencies in the coevolution of environment and livelihood: Contributions to the debate on Amazonian Black Earth. Geoderma, 111, 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes, G. R., Barbieri, A. F., Queiroz, B. L., & VanWey, L. (2011). Ciclo de vida domiciliar, ciclo do lote e mudança no uso da terra na Amazônia brasileira: revisão crítica da literatura. Revista Brasileira De Estudos De População – REBEP 28, 231–240. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-30982011000100013

  • Guedes, G. R., Brondizio, E., Barbieri, A. F., Resende, A., Penna-Firme, R., & D´Antona, A. (2012). Poverty and inequality in the rural Brazilian Amazon: A multidimensional approach. Human Ecology, 40, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes, G. R., Costa, S., & Brondízio, E. (2009). Revisiting the hierarchy of urban areas in the Brazilian Amazon: A multilevel approach. Population and Environment, 30, 159–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0083-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes, G. R., VanWey, L. K., Hull, J. R., Antigo, M., & Barbieri, A. F. (2014). Poverty dynamics, ecological endowments and land use among smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Science Research, 43, 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoselitz, B. F. (1963). Main concepts in the analysis of the social implications of technical change. In: B.F. Hoselitz & W. E. Moore. (Eds.), Industrialization and society. New York: UNESCO (Mouton).

  • Hull, J. R., & Guedes, G. R. (2013). Rebuilding Babel: Finding common development solutions using cross-contextual comparisons of multidimensional well-being. Revista Brasileira De Estudos De População, 30, 271–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C. (2008). Reflections on Latin American rural studies in the neoliberal globalization period: A new rurality? Development and Change, 39(6), 915–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahar, Dennis J. (1989). Government policies and deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon Region. Washington DC: World Bank Publications. Available in: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/304691468770373897/pdf/multi-page.pdf Access: April 6th, 2021.

  • Marquette, C. M. (1998). Land use patterns among small farmer settlers in the northeastern Ecuadorian Amazon. Human Ecology, 26(4), 573–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, S. D., Boucek, B., et al. (2002). Deforestation trajectories in a frontier region of the Brazilian Amazon. In S. J. Walsh & K. A. Crews-Meyer (Eds.), Linking people, place, and policy: A GIScience approach (pp. 215–234). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, S. D., Brondízio, E. S., Nelson, D., Moran, E. F., Siqueira, A. D., & Rodriguez-Pedraza, C. (1999). Remote sensing and GIS at farm property level: Demography and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(11), 1311–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monte-Mór, R. L. (2004). Modernities in the jungle: Extended urbanization in the Brazilian Amazon. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles.

  • Moran, E. F., Siqueira, A., et al. (2003). Household demographic structure and its relationship to deforestation in the Amazon basin. In J. Fox, R. R. Rindfuss, S. J. Walsh, & V. Mishra (Eds.), People and the environment: Approaches for linking household and community surveys to remote sensing and GI (pp. 61–89). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. L. (2001). Colonist farm income, off-farm work, cattle, and differentiation in Ecuador’s Northern Amazon. Human Organization, 60(1), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W. K., Carr, D. L., Barbieri, A. F., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Suchindran, C. (2007). Forest cleaning in the Ecuadorian Amazon: A study of patterns over space and time. Population Research and Policy Review, 26, 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W. K., & López-Carr, D. (2016). Land use as a mediating factor of fertility in the Amazon. Population and Environment, 38(1), 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perz, S. G. (2001). Household demographic factors as life cycle determinants of land use in the Amazon. Population Research and Policy Review, 20(3), 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perz, S. G. L. (2005). The importance of household asset diversity for livelihood diversity and welfare among small farm colonists in the Amazon. Journal of Development Studies, 41(7), 1193–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, A., Barbieri, A., Ludewigs, T., Merry, S., Perz, S., & Reis, E. (2009). Road impacts in Brazilian Amazonia. In M. Keller (Ed.), Amazonia and global change. Washington D.C.: American Geophysical Union Press, p. 101–113.

  • Pichón, F. (1996). Land use strategies in the Amazon frontier: Farm-level evidence from Ecuador. Human Organization, 55, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichón, F., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (1999). Land-use systems, deforestation and associated demographic factors in the humid tropics: Farm-level evidence from Ecuador. In R. E. Bilsborrow & D. Hogan (Eds.), Population and deforestation in the humid tropics. Liege: IUSSP.

  • Pieterse, J. N. (2001). Development theory: Deconstructions/reconstructions. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompermayer, M. (1982). Estratégias do grande capital na fronteira amazônica brasileira. Programa de Estudos Comparativos Latinoamericanos-PECLA, Departamento de Ciência Política, UFMG, 1982, 44 p.

  • Pompermayer, M. J. (1979). The State and the frontier in Brazil: A case study in the Amazon. 1979. PhD Dissertation (Political Sciences), Stanford University, Stanford.

  • Randell, H. (2018). The strength of near and distant ties: Social capital, environmental change, and migration in the Brazilian Amazon. Sociology of Development 4(4), 394–416. https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2018.4.4.394

  • Reardon, T., & Vosti, S. A. (1995). Links between rural poverty and the environment in developing countries: Asset categories and investment poverty. World Development, 23(9), 1495–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A. S., Ewers, R. M,, Parry, L., Souza Jr, C., Veríssimo, A., & Balmford, A. (2009). Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science (New York, N.Y.) 324, 1435–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174002

  • Sawyer, D. (1984). Frontier expansion and retraction in Brazil. In M. Schmink & C. Wood (Eds.), Frontier expansion in Amazônia (pp. 180–203). University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schielein, J., & Börner, J. (2018). Recent transformations of land-use and land-cover dynamics across different deforestation frontiers in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 76, 81–94, ISSN 0264–8377, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.052

  • Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72, Brighton: IDS.

  • Sellers, S., Bilsborrow, R., Salinas, V., & Mena, C. (2017). Population and development in the Amazon: A longitudinal study of migrant settlers in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon. Acta Amazonica, 47(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201602663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serageldin, I., Steer, A. D. (1994). Making development sustainable : from concepts to action. Estados Unidos: World Bank.

  • Sherbinin, A., VanWey, L. K., Mcsweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A. F., Henry, S., Hunter, L. M., Twine, W., & Walker, R. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 18, 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. S. (2004). The political economy of land conflict in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401010.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, P. M. (2008). The post-frontier: Land use and social change in the Brazilian Amazon (1992 – 2002). Ph.D. Dissertation – Environmental Design and Planning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.

  • Sydenstricker, J. M. (1992). Parceleiros de Machadinho: história migratória e as interações entre a dinâmica demográfica e o ciclo agrícola em Rondônia. Master Thesis. Campinas, Universidade de Campinas.

  • Thorner, D., B. Kerblay, et al. (1986). A.V. Chayanov on the theory of peasant economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

  • VanWey, L. K., D’Antona, A. O., & Brondizio, E. S. (2007). Household demographic change and land use/land cover change in the Brazilian Amazon. Population and Environment, 28(3), 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanWey, L. K., Hull, J. R., & Guedes, G. R. (2012). The ecology of capital: Shifting capital portfolios, context-specific returns to capital, and the link to general household wellbeing in frontier regions. In: K. Crews-Meyer & B. King (Eds.). The Politics and Ecologies of Health. Routledge Press, New York.

  • VanWey, L. K., Hull, J. R., & Guedes, G. R. (2013). Capitals and context: Bridging health and livelihoods in smallholder frontiers. In: B. King & K. Crews-Meyer. (Eds.), Ecologies and politics of health. Routledge Press, New York.

  • VanWey, L. K., & Vithayathil, T. (2013). Off-farm work among rural households: A case study in the Brazilian Amazon. Rural Sociology, 78(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., & Homma, A. K. O. (1996). Land use and land cover dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon: An overview. Ecological Economics, 18(1), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., Perz, S., et al. (2002). Land use and land cover change in forest frontiers: The role of household life cycles. International Regional Science Review, 25(2), 169–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. T. (2004). Theorizing land-cover and land-use change: The case of tropical deforestation. International Regional Science Review, 27(3), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, S. (2001). Poverty alleviation and tropical forests: What scope for synergies? World Development, 29(11), 1817–1833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author received funding for this paper from the National Research Council — CNPq, Brazil, grants 447688/2014–6 and 306567/2016–4, and Rede Clima (Brazilian Network for Climate Change Research).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Demography and Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), CEDEPLAR/FACE/UFMG, Sala 3037, Av. Antonio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-901, Brazil

    Alisson Flávio Barbieri

Authors
  1. Alisson Flávio Barbieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alisson Flávio Barbieri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbieri, A.F. Demo-livelihoods theoretical framework: microdemographics mediating livelihoods over frontier stages in the Amazon. Popul Environ 45, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-023-00419-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-023-00419-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation