Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soil pH - nutrient relationships: the diagram

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pH of the soil in relation to the availability of plant nutrients has been an important research topic in soil fertility and plant nutrition. In the 1930 and 1940 s, a diagram was proposed that showed how the availability of major and minor nutrients was affected by the pH. This conceptual diagram, developed by Emil Truog based on earlier work, included 11 nutrients. The width of the band at any pH value indicated the relative availability of the plant nutrient. The band did not present the actual amount, as that was affected by other factors such as the type of crop, soil and fertilization. For the 11 nutrients on the diagram, a pH of around 6.5 was considered most favorable. The diagram has been often published in text books and soil extension material and continues to be reproduced. This paper reviews how the diagram was developed, and what its limitations are. In recent decades, research in soil fertility and plant nutrition has focused on the biological transformations of plant nutrients in the soil and it has been recognized that the soil pH influences solubility, concentration in soil solution, ionic form, and adsorption and mobility of most plant nutrients. Nutrients interact and different plants respond differently to a change in pH. The soil pH cannot be used to predict or estimate plant nutrient availability, and the diagram should not be used as it suffers from numerous exceptions and barely represents any rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adcock KG, Gartrell JW, Brennan RF (2001) Calcium deficiency of wheat grown in acidic sandy soil from Southwestern Australia. J Plant Nutr 24(8):1217–1227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ (2017) The effects of pH on phosphate uptake from the soil. Plant Soil 410(1):401–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batjes NH (1995) A global dataset of soil pH properties. ISRIC, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey FPC (2005) Comments on a figure in “Australian soils and landscapes. An Illustrated Compendium”. ASSSI Newsletter, p 142

  • Blamey FPC, Chapman J (1982) Soil amelioration effects on peanut growth, yield and quality. Plant Soil 65(3):319–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt GH (1997) Soil pH, an early diagnostic tool: its determination and interpretation. In: Yaalon DH, Berkowicz S (eds) History of soil science international perspectives. Advances in geoecology. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen/Germany, pp 177–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (2008) The nature and properties of soils, 14th edn. Pearson-Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Clárk RB (1983) Plant genotype differences in the uptake, translocation, accumulation, and use of mineral elements required for plant growth. Plant Soil 72(2–3):175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Geus JG (1973) Fertilizer guide for the tropics and subtropics. Centre d’Etude de l’Azote, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal SS, Sharma V, Shukla AK (2022) Chapter one - impact of micronutrients in mitigation of abiotic stresses in soils and plants—A progressive step toward crop security and nutritional quality. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in Agronomy. Academic, pp 1–78

  • Dregne HE (1976) Soils of arid regions. Developments in soil science no. 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Martínez M, Sardans J, Chevallier F, Ciais P, Obersteiner M, Vicca S, Canadell JG, Bastos A, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Piao SL, Janssens IA, Peñuelas J (2019) Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO2 and temperature. Nat Clim Change 9(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine AK, van Es H, Schindelbeck R (2017) Statistics, scoring functions, and regional analysis of a comprehensive soil health database. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81:589–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foy CD, Oakes AJ, Schwartz JW (1979) Adaptation of some introduced eragrostis species to calcareous soil and acid mine spoil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 10(6):953–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartemink AE (1998) Acidification and pH buffering capacity of alluvial soils under sugarcane. Exp Agric 34(2):231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartemink AE (2021) Soil Science Americana - chronicles and progressions 1860–1960. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML, Attoe OJ (1971) Memoriam Emil Truog 1884–1969. Soil Sci 112:379–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg CE (1952) Our garden soils. The MacMIllan Company, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppe CW, Kirk GJD, Wissuwa M, Postma JA (2022) Rice increases phosphorus uptake in strongly sorbing soils by intra-root facilitation. Plant Cell Environ 45(3):884–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larcher W (2001) Physiological plant ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenher V, Truog E (1916) The quantitative determination of silica. J Am Chem Soc 38:1050–1063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marek RS, Richardson JB (2020) Investigating surficial geologic controls on soil properties, inorganic nutrient uptake, and northern hardwood growth in Western Massachusetts, USA. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 20(3):901–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JM, Spargo J, Penn CJ (2014) Soil fertility and plant nutrition. In: van Alfen N (ed) Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol 5. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 166–184

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moody PW, Aitken RL, Dickson T (1998) Field amelioration of acidic soils in south-east Queensland. III. Relationships of maize yield response to lime and unamended soil properties. Aust J Agric Res 49(4):649–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penn CJ, Camberato JJ (2019) A critical review on soil chemical processes that control how Soil pH affects phosphorus availability to plants. Agriculture 9(6):120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettinger NA (1936) A useful chart for teaching the relation of soil reaction to the availability of plant nutrients to crops. Virginia Agricultural and Mechanical College and Polytechnic Institute and the United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperating, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid A, Rafique E, Bughio N (1997) Micronutrient deficiencies in rainfed calcareous soils of pakistan. III. Boron nutrition of sorghum. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 28(6–8):441–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell JS, Chapman AL (1988) Sulfur deficiency in rice grown on the alkaline soils of the ord irrigation area, western australia. Aust J Exp Agric 28(1):111–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez PA, Salinas JG (1981) Low-input technology for managing oxisols and ultisols in tropical America. Adv Agron 34:279–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson RW (1995) Airborne dust and its significance to soils. Geoderma 65(1–2):1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slessarev EW, Lin Y, Bingham NL, Johnson JE, Dai Y, Schimel JP, Chadwick OA (2016) Water balance creates a threshold in soil pH at the global scale. Nature 540(7634):567–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (2003) Environmental soil chemistry, 2nd edn. Academic, Amsterdam

  • Sposito G (1989) The chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Truog E (1915) Soil acidity and methods for its detection. Science 42:505–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Truog E (1918) Soil acidity: I. Relation to growth of plants. Soil Science V:169–195

  • Truog E (1920) Testing soils for acidity. Bulletin. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Wisconsin, Madison, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Truog E (1937a) Availability of essential soil elements - a relative matter. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc (1):135–142

  • Truog E (1937b) A new soil acidity test for field purposes. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 1:155–159

  • Truog E (1946a) Andrew Robeson Whitson 1870–1945. Soil Sci 60:272–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Truog E (1946b) Soil reaction influence on availability of plant nutrients. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 11:305–308

  • Truog E (1965) Reflections of a professor of soil science. Soil Sci 99:143–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truog E, Attoe O, Jackson M (1945) Fertilizer application rationalized. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 10:219–223

  • Vega S, Calisay M, Hue NV (1992) Manganese toxicity in cowpea as affected by soil pH and sewage sludge amendments. J Plant Nutr 15(2):219–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll HR, Mutert E (1995) Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, FD Hole Soils Lab, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI, 53711, USA

    Alfred E. Hartemink

  2. Faculty of Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    N. J. Barrow

Authors
  1. Alfred E. Hartemink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. J. Barrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred E. Hartemink.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Peter J. Gregory.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartemink, A.E., Barrow, N.J. Soil pH - nutrient relationships: the diagram. Plant Soil 486, 209–215 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05861-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05861-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation