Abstract
The mass ratio hypothesis provides the key link between plant functional traits (PFTs) and ecosystem processes. Despite its centrality to the field it has had few direct tests. A litter decomposition study using grassland species, singly and in mixtures, was set up to see whether simple leaf traits could be used to predict the decomposition of leaf mixtures. Leaf Dry Matter Content (LDMC) was the trait that performed best. Mass loss in single species bags was best predicted using an exponential model. LDMC explained 48% of the variance in mixture mass loss. There was no significant impact of mixture species richness on mass loss. This study generally confirmed the predictions of the mass ratio hypothesis, but adds some support to other studies that indicate it needs broadening to take into account non-linear and threshold relationships between PFTs and ecosystem processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449
Aerts R, de Caluwe H (1997) Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex species. Ecology 78:244–260. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0244:NAPMCO]2.0.CO;2
Ball BA, Hunter MD, Kominoski JS, Swan CM, Bradford MA (2008) Consequences of non-random species loss for decomposition dynamics: experimental evidence for additive and non-additive effects. J Ecol 96:303–313. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01346.x
Ball BA, Bradford MA, Hunter MD (2009) Nitrogen and phosphorus release from mixed litter layers is lower than predicted from single species decay. Ecosystems 12:87–100. doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9208-2
Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE et al (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51:335–380. doi:10.1071/BT02124
Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O et al (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x
Cortez J, Garnier E, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Debussche M, Gillon D (2007) Plant traits, litter quality and decomposition in a Mediterranean old-field succession. Plant Soil 296:19–34. doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9285-6
De Deyn GB, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD (2008) Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecol Lett 11:516–531. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x
Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Cabido M, Cornellissen JHC, Jallili A et al (2004) The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents. J Veg Sci 15:295–304. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02266.x
Díaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F, Quètier F, Grigulis K, Robson TM (2007) Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. PNAS 104:20684–20689. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704716104
Finzi AC, Canham CD (1998) Non-additive effects of litter mixtures on net N mineralization in a southern New England forest. For Ecol Manage 105:129–136. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00277-6
Fortunel C, Garnier E, Joffre R, Kazakou E, Quested H, Grigulis K et al (2009) Leaf traits capture the effects of land use changes and climate on litter decomposability of herbaceous communities across Europe. Ecology 90:598–611. doi:10.1890/08-0418.1
Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas M-L, Roumet C, Debussche M et al (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:2630–2637. doi:10.1890/03-0799
Garnier E, Lavorel S, Ansquer P, Castro H, Cruz P, Dolezal J et al (2007) A standardized methodology to assess the effects of land use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands. Ann Bot 99:967–985. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm039
Gartner TB, Cardon ZG (2004) Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–246. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12738.x
Gartner TB, Cardon ZG (2006) Site of leaf origin affects how mixed litter decomposes. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2307–2317. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.02.014
Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x
Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932
Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S et al (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35. doi:10.1890/04-0922
Jonsson M, Wardle DA (2008) Context dependency of litter-mixing effects on decomposition and nutrient release across a long-term chronosequence. Oikos 117:1674–1682. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16810.x
Jonsson M, Wardle DA (2010) Structural equation modelling reveals plant-community drivers of carbon storage in boreal forest ecosystems. Biol Lett 6:116–119. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0613
Kazakou E, Vile D, Shipley B, Gallet C, Garnier E (2006) Co-variations in litter decomposition, leaf traits and plant growth in species from a Mediterranean old-field succession. Funct Ecol 20:21–30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01080.x
Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–556. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x
Mokany K, Ash J, Roxburgh S (2008) Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. J Ecol 96:884–893. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01395.x
Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331. doi:10.2307/1932179
Peltzer DA, Bellingham PJ, Kurokawa H, Walker LR, Wardle DA, Yeates GW (2009) Punching above their weight: low–biomass non-native plant species alter soil properties during primary succession. Oikos 118:1001–1014. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17244.x
Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Vendramini F, Gurvich DE, Cingolani AM, Giorgis MA et al (2007) Direct and indirect effects of climate on decomposition in native ecosystems from central Argentina. Aust Ecol 32:749–757. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01759.x
Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Blundo CM, Gurvich DE, Díaz S, Cuevas E (2008) More than the sum of its parts? Assessing litter heterogeneity effects on the decomposition of litter mixtures through leaf chemistry. Plant Soil 303:151–159. doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9495-y
Polley HW, Wilsey BJ, Derner JD, Johnson HB, Sanabria J (2006) Early-successional plants regulate grassland productivity and species composition: a removal experiment. Oikos 113:287–295. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14267.x
Quested HM, Callaghan TV, Cornelissen JHC, Press MC (2005) The impact of hemiparasitic plant litter on decomposition: direct, seasonal and litter mixing effects. J Ecol 93:87–98. doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00951.x
Quested H, Eriksson O, Fortunel C, Garnier E (2007) Plant traits relate to whole-community litter quality and decomposition following land use change. Funct Ecol 21:1016–1026. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01324.x
Salamanca EF, Kaneko N, Katagiri S (1998) Effects of leaf litter mixtures on the decomposition of Quercus serrata and Pinus densiflora using field and laboratory microcosm methods. Ecol Eng 10:53–73. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(97)10020-9
Smith MD, Knapp AK (2003) Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecol Lett 6:509–517. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00454.x
Strickland MS, Osburn E, Lauber C, Fierer N, Bradford MA (2009) Litter quality is in the eye of the beholder: initial decomposition rates as a function of inoculum characteristics. Funct Ecol 23:627–636. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01515.x
Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley
Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier E (2006) Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundances. Ecol Lett 9:1061–1067. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00958.x
Wardle DA, Barker GM, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS (1998) Can comparative approaches based on plant ecophysiological traits predict the nature of biotic interactions and individual plant species effects in ecosystems? J Ecol 86:405–420. doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00951.x
Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Barker GM, Yeates GW, Nicholson KS, Bardgett RD et al (1999) Plant removals in perennial grassland: vegetation dynamics, decomposers, soil biodiversity, and ecosystem properties. Ecol Monogr 69:535–568. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0535:PRIPGV]2.0.CO;2
Wardle DA, Nilsson M-C, Zackrisson O, Gallet C (2003) Determinants of litter mixing effects in a Swedish boreal forest. Soil Biol Biochem 35:827–835. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00118-4
Wedin DA, Tilman D (1996) Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on the carbon balance of grasslands. Science 274:1720–1723. doi:10.1126/science.274.5293.1720
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827. doi:10.1038/nature02403
Acknowledgements
The work was funded by the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate. Thanks to Donald Barrie at Glensaugh for the use of the land for the litter incubation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Harry Olde Venterink.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pakeman, R.J., Eastwood, A. & Scobie, A. Leaf dry matter content as a predictor of grassland litter decomposition: a test of the ‘mass ratio hypothesis’. Plant Soil 342, 49–57 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0664-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0664-z