Abstract
Topology has been characterized as an unsuitable mathematical framework for the investigation of geometric-perceptual phenomena. This has been attributed to the highly abstract nature of topology leading to failures in tasks such as making distinctions between geometrical figures (e.g., a cube versus a sphere) in which the human perceptual system succeeds easily. An alternative thesis is proposed on both philosophical and empirical grounds. The present analysis applies the Müller-Lyer (ML) illusion as a method of investigation to examine the suitability of topology in raising questions about geometric-perceptual phenomena and formulating potential answers to these questions. Not only will it be concluded that topology is a suitable mathematical framework in which one can formulate relevant questions and potential answers with respect to perceptual phenomena such as the ML illusion, it will also be discussed that topology will not be replaced by other means of spatial representation consistent with the findings that indicate its contributions to our daily spatial behavior along with other means such as Euclidean geometry. In addition, the analysis will be discussed with respect to two relevant themes: 1) the implications of the proposed view in relation to Husserl’s phenomenology and 2) the effect of developmental stages and education that may change the involvement of topology in such perceptual responses over time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Barclay, J. R., & Comalli, P. E. (1970). Age differences in perceptual learning on the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Psychonomic Science, 19(6), 323–325.
Bower, M. E. (2020). Husserl on hallucination: A conjunctive reading. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 58(3), 549–579.
Brown, J. R. (1999). Philosophy of mathematics: an introduction to the world of proofs and pictures. Routledge.
Chen, L. (2005). The topological approach to perceptual organization. Visual Cognition, 12(4), 553–637.
Chen, L. (1982). Topological structure in visual perception. Science, 218(4573), 699–700.
Coren, S., Porac, C. & Theodor, L. H. (1987). Set and subjective contour. In The perception of illusory contours (pp. 237–245). Springer.
Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1980). Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: The gestalt illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(3), 404.
da Silva, J. J. (2018). The (reasonable) effectiveness of mathematics in empirical science. Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin, 7(8), a003–a003.
da Silva, J. J. (2012). Husserl on geometry and spatial representation. Axiomathes, 22(1), 5–30.
Davis, C. M. (1970). Education and susceptibility to the Muller-Lyer illusion among the Banyankole. The Journal of Social Psychology, 82(1), 25–34.
Eysenck, H. J., & Slater, P. (1958). Effects of Practice and Rest on Fluctuation in the Müller-Lyer Illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 246–256.
Fitzpatrick, R. (2008). Euclid’s Elements of geometry. Lulu.
Hanna, R. (2015). Cognition, content, and the a priori: a study in the philosophy of mind and Knowledge. Oxford Univ. Press.
Hanna, R. (2002). Mathematics for humans: Kant's philosophy of arithmetic revisited. European Journal of Philosophy, 10(3), 328–352.
Hartimo, M. H. (2008). From geometry to phenomenology. Synthese, 162(2), 225–233.
Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and a phenomenological philosophy: First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. The Hague: Nijoff (translated by F. Kersten).
Husserl, E. (1973a). Logical Investigations, Vols. I, 11. Translation of the 2nd edition by J.N.
Husserl, E. (1973b). Logical Investigations, Vols. I, II. Translation of the 2nd edition. Findlay. Routledge and Kegan Paul. First German edition published in 1900/01.
Husserl, E. (1973c). Experience and Judgment. Translated by J. Churchill and K. Ameriks. Northwestern University Press. Original German edition published in 1939.
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Translated by D. Carr. Northwestern University Press. Originally published in German in 1936. The “Origin of Geometry” is included as an Appendix.
Julesz, B. (1962). Visual pattern discrimination. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 8(2), 84–92.
Kant, I. (2005). In: Guyer P, Wood AW (eds) 1781, Critique of pure reason. Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, E. O. (1908). The effect of practice on the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 2(3), 294.
Lorenz, K. (2009). Kant’s Doctrine of the A Priori in The Light of Contemporary Biology. In: RUSE, M. (Org.). Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. [S.l.] (p. 231–247). Princeton University Press.
Maguire, E. A., Burke, T., Phillips, J., & Staunton, H. (1996). Topographical disorientation following unilateral temporal lobe lesions in humans. Neuropsychologia, 34(10), 993–1001.
Marsden, J. E., & Hoffman, M. J. (1993). Elementary classical analysis. 2nd Edition, W.H. Freeman and Co.
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4), 115–133.
Mendelson, B. (1975). Introduction to topology, 3rd ed. Allyn and Bacon.
Meserve, B. (1953). Fundamental Concepts of Geometry. Dover.
Munkres, J. R. (2000). Topology, 2nd ed.. Prentice-Hall.
Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9(3), 429–434.
Overgaard, S. (2018). Perceptual error, conjunctivism, and Husserl. Husserl Studies, 34(1), 25–45.
Piaget, J. (1971a). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. The Viking Press.
Piaget, J. (1971b). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. The University of Chicago Press.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1971). The child’s conception of space. Trans. From the French by Langdon & JL Lunzer. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Piccinini, G. (2004). The First computational theory of mind and brain: A close look at mcculloch and pitts's “logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity”. Synthese, 141(2), 175–215.
Predebon, J. (2006). Decrement of the Müller-Lyer and Poggendorff illusions: The effects of inspection and practice. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70(5), 384–394.
Robinson, J. O. (1972). The psychology of visual illusion. Hutchinson.
Romano, C. (2012). Must phenomenology remain Cartesian? Continental Philosophy Review, 45, 425–445.
Romeyn, J. W. (2005). Enantiomorphy and time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 19(2), 167–190.
Rosen, S. M. (2015). Why natural science needs phenomenological philosophy. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119(3), 257–269.
Schwartz, E. L. (1980). Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: A spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding. Vision Research, 20(8), 645–669.
Scoville, N. (2012). Georg Cantor at the dawn of point-set topology. Loci: Convergence, 4. https://doi.org/10.4169/loci003861
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2017). Husserlian phenomenology and Darwinian evolutionary biology: complementarities, exemplifications, and implications. Studia Phaenomenologica, 17, 19–40.
Singh, G., Memoli, F., Ishkhanov, T., Sapiro, G., Carlsson, G., & Ringach, D. L. (2008). Topological analysis of population activity in visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 8(8):11, 1–18. http://journalofvision.org/8/8/11/, https://doi.org/10.1167/8.8.11
Tarski, A. (1994). Introduction to logic and to the methodology of the deductive sciences (Translated by Olaf Helmer). Dover Publications INC.
Tieszen, R. (2005). Free variation and the intuition of geometric essences: Some reflections on phenomenology and modern geometry. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(1), 153–173.
Todd, J. T., Chen, L., & Norman, J. F. (1998). On the relative salience of Euclidean, affine, and topological structure for 3-D form discrimination. Perception, 27(3), 273–282.
Tozzi, A., Peters, J. F., Fingelkurts, A. A., Fingelkurts, A. A., & Marijuán, P. C. (2017). Topodynamics of metastable brains. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 1–20.
Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 38(6), 483–495.
Westheimer, G. (2008). Illusions in the spatial sense of the eye: Geometrical–optical illusions and the neural representation of space. Vision Research, 48(20), 2128–2142.
Weyl, H. (1922). Space-time-matter (4th ed.). Methuen.
Wigner, E. P. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Richard courant lecture in mathematical sciences delivered at New York University, May 11, 1959. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1–14.
Zahn, C. T. (1971). Graph-theoretical methods for detecting and describing gestalt clusters. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 100(1), 68–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Code availability
Not applicable.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
I, Farshad Nemati, Thereby give consent for publication of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
The author has no conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nemati, F. The suitability of topology for the investigation of geometric-perceptual phenomena. Phenom Cogn Sci (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09857-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09857-z