Abstract
Background
Numerous genotype-guided warfarin dosing algorithms have been developed to individualize warfarin doses, but they can only explain 47–52% of the variability.
Aim
This study aimed to develop new warfarin algorithms suitable to predict the stable warfarin dose for the Chinese population and to compare their prediction performance with those of the most commonly used algorithms.
Method
Multiple linear regression analysis with the warfarin optimal dose (WOD), logarithm (log) WOD, 1/WOD, and \(\sqrt {\text {WOD}}\), respectively, as the dependent variables were performed to deduce a new warfarin algorithm (NEW-Warfarin). WOD was the stable dose that maintained the international normalized ratio (INR) within the target range (2.0–3.0). Three major genotype-guided warfarin dosing algorithms were selected and compared against NEW-Warfarin predictive performance using the mean absolute error (MAE). Furthermore, patients were divided into five groups according to warfarin indications [atrial fibrillation (AF), pulmonary embolism (PE), cardiac-related disease (CRD), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and other diseases (OD)]. Multiple linear regression analyses were also performed for each group.
Results
The regression equation with \(\sqrt {\text {WOD}}\) as the dependent variable had the highest coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.489). The NEW-Warfarin had the best predictive accuracy compared to the three algorithms selected. Group analysis, according to indications, showed that the R2 of the five groups were PE (0.902) > DVT (0.608) > CRD (0.569) > OD (0.436) > AF (0.424).
Conclusion
Dosing algorithms based on warfarin indications are more suitable for predicting warfarin doses. Our research provides a novel strategy to develop indication-specific warfarin dosing algorithms to improve the efficacy and safety of warfarin prescribing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xie C, Xue L, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of the prediction performance of different warfarin dosing algorithms based on Chinese patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2020;21:23–32.
Shaw K, Amstutz U, Kim RB, et al. Clinical practice recommendations on genetic testing of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 variants in warfarin therapy. Ther Drug Monit. 2015;37:428–36.
Johnson JA, Caudle KE, Gong L, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing: 2017 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;102:397–404.
Gustafsson D, Bylund R, Antonsson T, et al. A new oral anticoagulant: the 50-year challenge. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:649–59.
Miao L, Yang J, Huang C, et al. Contribution of age, body weight, and CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype to the anticoagulant response to warfarin: proposal for a new dosing regimen in Chinese patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:1135–41.
Wei M, Ye F, Xie D, et al. A new algorithm to predict warfarin dose from polymorphisms of CYP4F2, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 and clinical variables: derivation in Han Chinese patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost. 2012;107:1083–91.
Zhong SL, Yu XY, Liu Y, et al. Integrating interacting drugs and genetic variations to improve the predictability of warfarin maintenance dose in Chinese patients. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22:176–82.
Bader L, Mahfouz A. The effect of genetic and nongenetic factors on warfarin dose variability in Qatari population. Pharmacogenomics J. 2020;20:277–84.
Wu AH. Use of genetic and nongenetic factors in warfarin dosing algorithms. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8:851–61.
Huang SW, Chen HS, Wang XQ, et al. Validation of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes on interindividual warfarin maintenance dose: a prospective study in Chinese patients. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009;19:226–34.
Li X, Liu R, Luo ZY, et al. Comparison of the predictive abilities of pharmacogenetics-based warfarin dosing algorithms using seven mathematical models in Chinese patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2015;16:583–90.
Wadelius M, Chen LY, Lindh JD, et al. The largest prospective warfarin-treated cohort supports genetic forecasting. Blood. 2009;113:784–92.
Yang M, Choi R, Kim JS, et al. Evaluation of 16 genotype-guided warfarin dosing algorithms in 310 Korean patients receiving warfarin treatment: poor prediction performance in VKORC1 1173C carriers. Clin Ther. 2016;38:2666–74.
Zhu YB, Hong XH, Wei M, et al. Development of a novel individualized warfarin dose algorithm based on a population pharmacokinetic model with improved prediction accuracy for Chinese patients after heart valve replacement. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38:434–42.
Gao W, Li Z, Chen W, et al. Performance evaluation of warfarin dose prediction algorithms and effects of clinical factors on warfarin dose in Chinese patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2021;43(4):527–35.
Klein TE, Altman RB, Eriksson N, et al. Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:753–64.
Ohno M, Yamamoto A, Ono A, et al. Influence of clinical and genetic factors on warfarin dose requirements among Japanese patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65:1097–103.
Sasano M, Ohno M, Fukuda Y, et al. Verification of pharmacogenomics-based algorithms to predict warfarin maintenance dose using registered data of Japanese patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;75:901–11.
Kaye JB, Schultz LE, Steiner HE, et al. Warfarin pharmacogenomics in diverse populations. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:1150–63.
Lin M, Yu L, Qiu H, et al. Verification of five pharmacogenomics-based warfarin administration models. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016;48:258–63.
Cho SM, Lee KY, Choi JR, et al. Development and comparison of warfarin dosing algorithms in stroke patients. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57:635–40.
Lei X, Guo Y, Sun J, et al. Accuracy assessment of pharmacogenetic algorithms for warfarin dose prediction in Chinese patients. Am J Hematol. 2012;87:541–4.
Cho HJ, On YK, Bang OY, et al. Development and comparison of a warfarin-dosing algorithm for Korean patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Ther. 2011;33:1371–80.
Li W, Zhao P, Chen L, et al. Impact of CYP2C9, VKORC1, ApoE and ABCB1 polymorphisms on stable warfarin dose requirements in elderly Chinese patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2020;21:101–10.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–962.
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135:e1159–95.
Kılıç S, Çelik A, Çekirdekçi E, et al. The prevalence and risks of inappropriate combination of aspirin and warfarin in clinical practice: results from WARFARIN-TR study. Balkan Med J. 2019;36:17–22.
Makar-Aušperger K, Krželj K, Lovrić Benčić M, et al. Warfarin dosing according to the genotype-guided algorithm is most beneficial in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized parallel group trial. Ther Drug Monit. 2018;40:362–8.
Zhang W, Zhang WJ, Zhu J, et al. Genetic polymorphisms are associated with variations in warfarin maintenance dose in Han Chinese patients with venous thromboembolism. Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13:309–21.
Maramba A, Ncube S, Mandisodza A, et al. An assessment of the effectiveness of warfarin therapy monitoring systems on thrombophilic patients in zimbabwe. TH Open. 2018;2:e325–8.
Dang MT, Hambleton J, Kayser SR. The influence of ethnicity on warfarin dosage requirement. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:1008–12.
Gaikwad T, Ghosh K, Shetty S. VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotype distribution in Asian countries. Thromb Res. 2014;134:537–44.
Miura T, Nishinaka T, Terada T, et al. Relationship between aging and dosage of warfarin: the current status of warfarin anticoagulant therapy for Japanese outpatients in a department of cardiovascular medicine. J Cardiol. 2009;53:355–60.
Funding
This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (20210302124649) and WU JIEPING Medical Foundation (320.6750.2021-08-12).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, W., Zhang, Z., Guan, Z. et al. Developing Chinese race-specific warfarin dose prediction algorithms. Int J Clin Pharm 45, 731–738 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01565-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01565-1