Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Drug allergy documentation-time for a change?

  • Short Research Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective of the study To audit patients’ allergy documentation in a large rural hospital an to make recommendations about accurate drug allergies in hospital settings. Setting a 257 bed large hospital and fully integrated health service in Australia, providing a range of services including; medicine, surgery, aged care, cancer care, mental health, maternity and rehabilitation. Method A retrospective design was used to fulfil the aims of this study. Patient medical records were randomly selected and checked for allergy documentation over a 6 month period. Results A total of 521 patients’ medical records were reviewed. Of all the medical records examined in total, 269 (52%) had no allergy, while 252 (48%) reported some kind of allergy. Overall, only three patients (0.6%) had their allergy details fully and accurately recorded in the three places audited and they are the front cover of the patients’ notes, the admission notes and the drug chart. Conclusion Many preventable medical errors are caused by poor documentation which is often due to lack of drug allergy information. All health professional should be more pro-active in determining the manner of any drug allergy or adverse drug reactions (ADR) along with the extent of the reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Cantrill JA, Cottrell WN. Accuracy of drug allergy documentation. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1997;54(14):1627–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Radford A, Undre S, Alkhamesi NA, Darzi AW. Recording of drug allergies: are we doing enough? J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Larid N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events–implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sim L, Barras M, Cottrell N. Patients’ understanding of drug allergy and documentation–is there a link? J Pharm Pract Res. 2005;35(4):276–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lesar TS, Briceland L, Stein DS. Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. JAMA. 1997;277(4):312–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farooq M, Kirke C, Foley K. Documentation of drug allergy on drug charts in patients presenting for surgery. IJMS. 2008;177(1):243–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Valente S, Fisher D. Nurses improve medication safety with medication allergy and adverse drug reports. J Nurs Care Qual. 2007;22(4):322–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pilzer JD, Burke TG, Mutnick AH. Drug allergy assessment at a university hospital and clinic. Am J Health-syst Pharm. 1996;53(24):2970–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Paparella S. Allergies: essential patient information for safe practice. J Emerg Nurs. 2009;35(3):239–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sullivan KarynM, Linda M. Spooner. Adverse-drug-reaction reporting by pharmacy students in a teaching hospital. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008;65(12):1177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staff at the Health information department at the hospital that facilitated the data collection process.

Funding

This study was not funded by any grant.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanan Khalil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khalil, H., Leversha, A. & Khalil, V. Drug allergy documentation-time for a change?. Int J Clin Pharm 33, 610–613 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9525-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9525-y

Keywords

Navigation