Skip to main content
Log in

To Maintain Formulation Composition Similarity of Coated Tablets of Different Strengths: Should Coating be Based on Core Tablet Weight or Surface Area?

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

As per the Japanese or SUPAC guidance to maintain formulation composition similarity across tablet strengths, the coating should be applied based on the core tablet surface area or weight, respectively. These two coating approaches were compared by evaluating protective effects of coating on the light stability of three model compounds.

Methods

Core tablets of three light sensitive drugs, nifedipine, rosuvastatin calcium, and montelukast sodium were coated either with PVA-based Opadry® II white or Opadry® II beige. The coated tablets were exposed to light up to three ICH cycles.

Results

For Opadry® II white, the surface area based coating provided consistent light protection across tablet strengths when the coating amount was more than 0.1 mg/mm2 compared to that based on core tablet weights. For Opadry® II beige, both approaches gave comparable and better light protection due to presence of iron oxides. The light protection by Opadry® II white could be because of physical barrier of coating, which was uniform across the strengths when it was based on core tablet surface area.

Conclusion

For a routine tablet formulation development with Opadry color coating, it does not matter whether the coating is applied based on the core tablet surface area or weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US FDA. Bioavailability studies submitted in NDAs or INDs – general considerations 2019 [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/bioavailability-studies-submitted-ndas-or-inds-general-considerations.

  2. CDER. Waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms based on a biopharmaceutics classification system guidance for industry 2017 [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/70963/download.

  3. Agency EM. ICH Topic Q 1 D bracketing and matrixing designs for stability testing of drug substances and drug products 2002 [Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-q-1-d-bracketing-matrixing-designs-stability-testing-drug-substances-drug-products-step-5_en.pdf.

  4. Pharmaceutical and food safety bureau . “Guideline for bioequivalence studies for formulation changes of oral solid dosage forms” English translation of Attachment 3 of Division-Notification 0229 No. 10 of the Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau. Dated 2012; February 29. 2012 [Available from: https://www.nihs.go.jp/drug/be-guide(e)/form/GL-E_120229_shohou.pdf.

  5. USFDA. SUPAC-IR: Immediate-release solid oral dosage forms: scale-up and post-approval changes: Chemistry, manufacturing and controls, in vitro dissolution testing, and in vivo bioequivalence documentation. 1995.

  6. Maafi M, Maafi W. Montelukast photodegradation: elucidation of Ф-order kinetics, determination of quantum yields and application to actinometry. Int J Pharm. 2014;471(1–2):544–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maafi W, Maafi M. Modelling nifedipine photodegradation, photostability and actinometric properties. Int J Pharm. 2013;456(1):153–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuda Y, Teraoka R, Sugimoto I. Comparative evaluation of photostability of solid-state nifedipine under ordinary and intensive light irradiation conditions. Int J Pharm. 1989;54(3):211–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah RP, Sahu A Fau - Singh S, Singh S. LC-MS/TOF, LC-MSn, on-line H/D exchange and LC-NMR studies on rosuvastatin degradation and in silico determination of toxicity of its degradation products: a comprehensive approach during drug development. (1618–2650 (Electronic)).

  10. CDER and CBER. Guidance for industry Q1B photostability testing of new drug substances and products 1996 [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/71713/download.

  11. Desai DS, Abdelnasser MA, Rubitski BA, Varia SA. Photostabilization of uncoated tablets of sorivudine and nifedipine by incorporation of synthetic iron oxides. Int J Pharm. 1994;103(1):69–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen W, Chang SY, Kiang S, Marchut A, Lyngberg O, Wang J, et al. Modeling of pan coating processes: prediction of tablet content uniformity and determination of critical process parameters. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(7):3213–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Teraoka R, Matsuda Y, Sugimoto I. Quantitative design for photostabilization of nifedipine by using titanium dioxide and/or tartrazine as colourants in model film coating systems. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1989;41(5):293–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. El Hagrasy A, Chang SY, Desai D, Kiang S. Application of Raman spectroscopy for quantitative in-line monitoring of tablet coating. American Pharmaceutical Review. 2006;9:40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. El Hagrasy AS, Chang S-Y, Desai D, Kiang S. Raman spectroscopy for the determination of coating uniformity of tablets: assessment of product quality and coating pan mixing efficiency during scale-up. J Pharm Innov. 2006;1(1):37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divyakant Desai.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reddy, J.P., Vyas, G., Patel, R. et al. To Maintain Formulation Composition Similarity of Coated Tablets of Different Strengths: Should Coating be Based on Core Tablet Weight or Surface Area?. Pharm Res 37, 201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-020-02926-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-020-02926-5

Key words

Navigation