Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Time to the doctorate: Multilevel discrete-time hazard analysis

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Secondary data on 1,028 graduate students nested within 24 programs and admitted into either a Ph. D. or Ed. D. program between 1990 and 2006 at an American public university were used to illustrate the benefits of employing multilevel discrete-time hazard analysis in understanding the timing of doctorate completion in Education and the factors related to this timing. While no single factor was found that explains conclusively the timing of doctorate completion, this analytic technique, which takes into account the clustering of students within programs and includes information about students who do not graduate by the end of the observation period (censored cases), revealed that the median time-to-doctorate was 5.8 years, with the fifth and seventh years as periods students were most likely to complete the doctorate. A student’s master’s GPA at admission, the proportion of female students in the program, and the mean GRE quantitative score in the program were each positively associated with the odds of doctorate award whereas the size of the department housing the program had a negative association. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that “risk,” as used here does not have a negative connotation as in the regular usage of the word.

References

  • Abedi, J., & Benkin, E. (1987). The effects of students’ academic, financial, and demographic variables on time to doctorate. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, C. R. (1999). Doctoral student’s attrition and persistence. A meta-analysis of research. Ph. D. dissertation, Loyola University, United States—Illinois. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. (Publication No. AAT 9917754).

  • Barber, J. S., Murphy, S. A., Axinn, W. G., & Maples, J. (2000). Discrete-time multilevel hazard analysis. Sociological Methodology, 30, 201–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, L., Bini, M., & Grilli, L. (2001). The transition from university to work: A multilevel approach to the analysis of the time to obtain the first job. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 164(2), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. W., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., Lord, G., et al. (1991). Measuring time to the doctorate: Reinterpretation of the evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 88(3), 713–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boydstun, R. L. (1996). Time to the doctorate: A study of the trends in and an analysis of the factors affecting the required time to complete the doctorate at the University of Texas at Austin. ProQuest Digital Dissertations (UMI No. 9633094).

  • Burke, J. C., Minnasian, H., & Yang, P. (2002). State performance reporting indicators: What do they indicate? Planning for Higher Education, 31(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civian, J. T. (1990). Using proportional hazards models to examine time to doctorate. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University, Massachusetts.

  • Cohen, M. (1998). Determining sample sizes for surveys with data analyzed by hierarchical linear models. Journal of Official Statistics, 14, 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crayton, B. R. (2005). Ethnicity and time-to-degree: Experiences of women social work doctorates. Ph. D. dissertation, Wurzweiler School of Social Work, United States—New York, Retrieved February 19, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. (Publication No. AAT 3164035).

  • DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A., & McCall, B. P. (2002). A temporal investigation of factors related to timely graduation. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., & Mavros, P. G. (1995). Do doctoral students’ financial support patterns affect their time-to-degree and completion probabilities? The Journal of Human Resources, 30(3), 581–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, T. J., & Rodriguez, G. (1997). Completing the Ph.D.: Comparative performances of U. S. and foreign students. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 593–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelauf, J. (1989, March 15). Lengthening of time to earn a doctorate causes concern. Chronicle of Higher Education, 13–14.

  • Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate degree progress. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, G. G. (1996). When and why are multilevel techniques necessary: An overview, including simulation studies. Los Angeles: California State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layzell, D. T. (1999). Linking performance to funding outcomes at the state level for public institutions of higher education: Past, present and future. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (2000). A study of selected factors affecting time to doctorate and graduation at the University of Iowa. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Iowa, United States—Iowa. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I. (Publication No. AAT 9996125).

  • Ligfoot, R. C., & Doerner, W. G. (2008). Student success and failure in a graduate criminology/criminal justice program. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., & Willms, J. (1999). Dropping out of advanced mathematics: How much do students and schools contribute to the problem? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M. A., Ford, M. E., & Thompson, C. M. (2004). Degree progress of women doctoral students: Factors that constrain, facilitate, and differentiate. The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 385–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2009). Doctorate Recipients from U. S. universities: Summary report 2007–08. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

  • Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1993). From facts to action: Expanding the graduate division’s educational role. New Directions for Institutional Research, 80, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paccagnella, O. (2006). Comparing vocational training courses through a discrete-time multilevel hazard model. Statistical Modeling, 6, 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanations and predictions (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5(5), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., Brennan, R., & Buka, S. L. (2002). Estimating multi-level discrete-time hazard models using cross-sectional data: Neighborhood effects on the onset of adolescent cigarette use. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 297–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, J., & Neumann, R. (2008). Predictors of timely doctoral completions by type of attendance: The utility of a pragmatic approach. Journal of Higher education Policy and Management, 30(1), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronco, S. L. (1994). Meandering ways: Studying student stopout with survival analysis. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research (AIR), New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED373633)

  • Seagram, B. C., Gould, J., & Pyke, S. W. (1998). An investigation of gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degree. Research in Higher Education, 39, 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, J. J., & Stock, W. A. (2001). So you want to earn a Ph.D. in economics? How long do you think it will take? The Journal of Human Resources, 36(2), 364–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1993). It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study the duration and the timing of events. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 155–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skudlarek, L. J. (1992). An examination of selected variables associated with completion of requirements for a doctorate in education. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, United States—Texas. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.(Publication No. AAT 9225729).

  • Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, 3, 1570–1573. Chicester (etc.): Wiley.

  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1993). Standard errors and sample sizes for two level research. Journal of Behavioral Statistics, 18, 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, J. E. M. (2003). The hazard of success: A longitudinal study of time-to-degree among doctoral students using discrete-time survival analysis. Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University, United States—Massachusetts, Retrieved February 19, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. (Publication No. AAT 3100170).

  • Strayhorn, T. L. (2005). More than money matters: An integrated model of graduate student persistence. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Virginia.

  • Tierce, K. R. (2008). The impact of doctoral program structure on time-to-degree for Texas public school administrators. Ph.D. dissertation, Tarleton State University, United States—Texas. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.(Publication No. AAT 3338436).

  • Tinto, V. (1988). Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H., Coyle, S., & Bae, B. (1990). On time to the doctorate. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. News & World Report. (2009). National universities ranking. Retrieved July 6, 2009 from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/national-search

  • Wao, H. O. (2008). A mixed methods approach to examining factors related to time to attainment of the Doctorate in Education. Ph.D. dissertation, University of South Florida, United States—Florida. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.(Publication No. AAT 3347379).

  • Weis, L. (2009). Editorial statement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 6–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. B., & Singer, J. D. (1991). From whether to when: New methods for studying student dropout and teacher attrition. Review of Educational Research, 61, 407–450.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

An earlier version of this article won the distinguished paper award at the Florida Educational Research Association (FERA) 2008 conference. Its revision has benefitted from the comments and suggestions of Dr. Robert Dedrick, Dr. John Ferron, and Dr. Anthony Onwuegbuzie. Thanks to the editors and anonymous EAEA reviewers for their thoughtful and helpful feedback on the development of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hesborn O. Wao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wao, H.O. Time to the doctorate: Multilevel discrete-time hazard analysis. Educ Asse Eval Acc 22, 227–247 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9099-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9099-6

Keywords

Navigation