Abstract
In the present study, deterministic and probabilistic approaches have been used for the assessment of liquefaction potential of ground during an earthquake. The deterministic approach was used to analyze and assess the liquefaction of loose saturated river bed deposit with emphasis on two benchmark locations. A wide range of earthquake data in the form of peak ground acceleration (PGA) values of 0.18 g, 0.37 g, 0.6 g and 0.75 g was used as input motions. The dynamic properties of soil were evaluated using standard penetration test (SPT) data obtained from the bore logs. The shear stress induced within soil deposit due to the seismic excitation was calculated in the form of cyclic stress ratio (CSR) and cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) in order to calculate the factor of safety (FOS) against liquefaction. In addition, liquefaction potential index (LPI) and probability of liquefaction (PL) were also calculated using input motion. It was observed, based on the probability analysis and liquefaction indices, that the shallow layer soil profile is safe against liquefaction, whereas deep layer soil profile is unsafe.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balakrishnan TS, Unnikrishnan P, Murty AVS (2009) The tectonic map of India and contiguous areas. J Geol Soc India 74:158–170
Cetin KO, Seed RB, DerKiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF Jr, Kayen RE, Moss RES (2004) Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotechgeoenvironeng 130(12):1314–1340
Dasgupta S, Mukhopadhyay M, Nandy DR (1987) Active transverse features in the central portion of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 136:255–264
Dixit J, Dewaikar D, Jangid R (2012) Assessment of liquefaction potential index for Mumbai city. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2759–2768. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2759-2012
Fear CE, McRoberts EC (1995) Reconsideration of initiation of liquefaction in sandy soils. J GeotechEng ASCE 121(GT3):249–261
Hazarika H, Boominathan A (2009) Liquefaction and ground failures during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake India. In: Kokusho T (ed) Earthquake geotechnical case histories for performance based design, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 201–226
HseinJuang C, Chen CJ, Jiang T, Andrus RD (2000) Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests. Can Geotech J37:1195–1208
Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. EERI Oakland California USA
IS 1893 Part-1 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures: general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
IS 2131-2002 (2002) Method for standard penetration test for soil. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
IS 2720-Part II (1973) Method of test of soil part II-determination of water content. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
IS 2720-Part III (1980) Method of test of soil part III-determination of specific gravity. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
IS 2720-Part IV (1985) Method of test of soil part IV- grain size analysis. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes 33rd Rankine lecture. Geotechnique 43(3):351–415
Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F, Watanabe S, Yasuda S, Sato H (1982) Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference microzonation, 3: 1310–30.
JieZhang TW, Xiao S, Gao L (2021) Chinese code methods for liquefaction potential assessment based on standard penetration test: an extension. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 144:106697
Muley P, Maheswari BK, Paul DK (2015) Liquefaction potential of roorkee region using field and laboratory tests. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1:37
Neupane R, Suzuki K (2011) Liquefaction potential analysis of Kathmandu valley. Research Report of Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Saitama University, Japan. 37: 9–16
Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equation in term of characteristic soil indexes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 6:167–187
Orense RP (2005) Assessment of liquefaction potential based on peak ground motion parameters. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(3):225–240
Rao KS, Satyam DN (2007) Liquefaction studies for seismic microzonation of Delhi region. Curr Sci 92(5):646–654
Sana H, Nath SK (2016) Liquefaction potential analysis of the Kashmir valley alluvium NW Himalaya. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 85:11–18
Satyanarayana Reddy CNV, Harika A (2023) Study on liquefaction evaluation of subsoil strata along Visakhapatnam coastal area. In: Muthukkumaran K, Ayothiraman R, Kolathayar S (eds) Soil dynamics, earthquake and computational geotechnical engineering. IGC 2021. Lecture notes in civil engineering, vol 300. Springer, Singapore
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(SM9):1249–1273
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph, Oakland
Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung R (1985) Influence of SPT procedure in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation. J GeotechEng ASCE 111(GT12):1425–1445
Silahtar A, Karaaslan H, Özocak A, Bol E, Sert S, Kocaman K, Özsağır M (2023) Assessment of the liquefaction potential of the Arifiye (Sakarya) region with multidisciplinary geoscience approaches in the GIS environment. J App Geophys 212:104983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.104983
Sonmez H (2003) Modification of the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction susceptibility mapping for a liquefaction-prone area (Inegol, Turkey). Environ Geol 44(7):862–871
Srivastava HN and Bhattacharya SN (2020) Earthquake safety for tall statues higher than 100 m. Vayu Mandal 46(1)
Subedi M, Acharya IP (2022) Liquefaction hazard assessment and ground failure probability analysis in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. Geoenviron Disasters 9:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-021-00203-0
Thoithoi L, Dubey CS, Ningthoujam PS et al (2016) Liquefaction potential evaluation for subsurface soil layers of Delhi region. J Geol Soc India 88:147–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-016-0473-y
Youd TL et al (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils. Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833
Yu H, Miao Y (2013) Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during major earthquakes of the twenty-first century. Nat Hazards 65:2375–2384
Zhang G, Robertson PK, Brachman RWI (2004) Estimating liquefaction-induced lateral displacements using the standard penetration test or cone penetration test. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(8):861–871
Acknowledgements
The corresponding author is thankful to the help received from Dr. Mohit Kumar Gupta, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, KNIT Sultanpur. The author is also thankful to the anonymous reviewer for providing their valuable comments in order to improve the quality of research paper.
Funding
Not Applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any personal or financial conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Poddar, P., Ojha, S. & Gupta, M.K. Probabilistic and deterministic-based approach for liquefaction potential assessment of layered soil. Nat Hazards 118, 993–1012 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06031-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06031-9