Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic and deterministic-based approach for liquefaction potential assessment of layered soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, deterministic and probabilistic approaches have been used for the assessment of liquefaction potential of ground during an earthquake. The deterministic approach was used to analyze and assess the liquefaction of loose saturated river bed deposit with emphasis on two benchmark locations. A wide range of earthquake data in the form of peak ground acceleration (PGA) values of 0.18 g, 0.37 g, 0.6 g and 0.75 g was used as input motions. The dynamic properties of soil were evaluated using standard penetration test (SPT) data obtained from the bore logs. The shear stress induced within soil deposit due to the seismic excitation was calculated in the form of cyclic stress ratio (CSR) and cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) in order to calculate the factor of safety (FOS) against liquefaction. In addition, liquefaction potential index (LPI) and probability of liquefaction (PL) were also calculated using input motion. It was observed, based on the probability analysis and liquefaction indices, that the shallow layer soil profile is safe against liquefaction, whereas deep layer soil profile is unsafe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balakrishnan TS, Unnikrishnan P, Murty AVS (2009) The tectonic map of India and contiguous areas. J Geol Soc India 74:158–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin KO, Seed RB, DerKiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF Jr, Kayen RE, Moss RES (2004) Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotechgeoenvironeng 130(12):1314–1340

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Mukhopadhyay M, Nandy DR (1987) Active transverse features in the central portion of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 136:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit J, Dewaikar D, Jangid R (2012) Assessment of liquefaction potential index for Mumbai city. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2759–2768. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2759-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fear CE, McRoberts EC (1995) Reconsideration of initiation of liquefaction in sandy soils. J GeotechEng ASCE 121(GT3):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika H, Boominathan A (2009) Liquefaction and ground failures during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake India. In: Kokusho T (ed) Earthquake geotechnical case histories for performance based design, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 201–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HseinJuang C, Chen CJ, Jiang T, Andrus RD (2000) Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests. Can Geotech J37:1195–1208

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. EERI Oakland California USA

  • IS 1893 Part-1 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures: general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2131-2002 (2002) Method for standard penetration test for soil. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2720-Part II (1973) Method of test of soil part II-determination of water content. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2720-Part III (1980) Method of test of soil part III-determination of specific gravity. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2720-Part IV (1985) Method of test of soil part IV- grain size analysis. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes 33rd Rankine lecture. Geotechnique 43(3):351–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F, Watanabe S, Yasuda S, Sato H (1982) Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference microzonation, 3: 1310–30.

  • JieZhang TW, Xiao S, Gao L (2021) Chinese code methods for liquefaction potential assessment based on standard penetration test: an extension. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 144:106697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muley P, Maheswari BK, Paul DK (2015) Liquefaction potential of roorkee region using field and laboratory tests. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neupane R, Suzuki K (2011) Liquefaction potential analysis of Kathmandu valley. Research Report of Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Saitama University, Japan. 37: 9–16

  • Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equation in term of characteristic soil indexes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 6:167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orense RP (2005) Assessment of liquefaction potential based on peak ground motion parameters. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(3):225–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao KS, Satyam DN (2007) Liquefaction studies for seismic microzonation of Delhi region. Curr Sci 92(5):646–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Sana H, Nath SK (2016) Liquefaction potential analysis of the Kashmir valley alluvium NW Himalaya. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 85:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana Reddy CNV, Harika A (2023) Study on liquefaction evaluation of subsoil strata along Visakhapatnam coastal area. In: Muthukkumaran K, Ayothiraman R, Kolathayar S (eds) Soil dynamics, earthquake and computational geotechnical engineering. IGC 2021. Lecture notes in civil engineering, vol 300. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(SM9):1249–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung R (1985) Influence of SPT procedure in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation. J GeotechEng ASCE 111(GT12):1425–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silahtar A, Karaaslan H, Özocak A, Bol E, Sert S, Kocaman K, Özsağır M (2023) Assessment of the liquefaction potential of the Arifiye (Sakarya) region with multidisciplinary geoscience approaches in the GIS environment. J App Geophys 212:104983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.104983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H (2003) Modification of the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction susceptibility mapping for a liquefaction-prone area (Inegol, Turkey). Environ Geol 44(7):862–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava HN and Bhattacharya SN (2020) Earthquake safety for tall statues higher than 100 m. Vayu Mandal 46(1)

  • Subedi M, Acharya IP (2022) Liquefaction hazard assessment and ground failure probability analysis in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. Geoenviron Disasters 9:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-021-00203-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoithoi L, Dubey CS, Ningthoujam PS et al (2016) Liquefaction potential evaluation for subsurface soil layers of Delhi region. J Geol Soc India 88:147–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-016-0473-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL et al (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils. Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Miao Y (2013) Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during major earthquakes of the twenty-first century. Nat Hazards 65:2375–2384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Robertson PK, Brachman RWI (2004) Estimating liquefaction-induced lateral displacements using the standard penetration test or cone penetration test. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(8):861–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author is thankful to the help received from Dr. Mohit Kumar Gupta, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, KNIT Sultanpur. The author is also thankful to the anonymous reviewer for providing their valuable comments in order to improve the quality of research paper.

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prince Poddar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any personal or financial conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poddar, P., Ojha, S. & Gupta, M.K. Probabilistic and deterministic-based approach for liquefaction potential assessment of layered soil. Nat Hazards 118, 993–1012 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06031-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06031-9

Keywords

Navigation