Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision-making deficits are strong predictors of poor clinical outcomes in addiction treatment. However, research on interventions that address decision-making deficits among people with addiction is scarce and has not been analyzed. We aimed to systematically review evidence on neuropsychological interventions for decision-making deficits in addiction to identify promising therapies. Eligibility criteria were (1) participants with a diagnosis of substance use or behavioral addictive disorders, (2) interventions consisting of (neuro) psychological treatments that address decision-making, (3) comparators comprising control (sham) interventions, treatment as usual or no-treatment, (4) outcomes including a decision-making task, and (5) studies including RCTs and non-randomized trials. Search terms included addiction (or alcohol/drug/substance use/gambling) AND treatment (or specific interventions) AND decision-making (or specific tasks). The search yielded 728 hits, and two independent assessors agreed on the final selection of 12 articles. Interventions included Contingency Management (3 studies), Working Memory Training (2 studies) Goal Management Training (2 studies), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (2 studies), Reality Therapy, Motivational Interview and Monetary Management. The main outcome measures were tasks of delay discounting, risk-taking and reward-based decision-making. Results showed that Goal Management Training improves reward-based decision-making, while Contingency Management combined with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy has beneficial effects on delay discounting. The evidence on Working Memory Training and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as stand-alone treatments was mixed. Motivational Interview and Monetary Management had no significant effects on decision-making. Bias control across studies was moderate. We conclude that Goal Management Training and Contingency Management combined with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy have potential to modify decision-making in people with addiction. RCTs are needed to establish the efficacy of these interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfonso, J. P., Caracuel, A., Delgado-Pastor, L. C., & Verdejo-García, A. (2011). Combined goal management training and mindfulness meditation improve executive functions and decision-making performance in abstinent polysubstance abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 117(1), 78–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A. (2005). Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1458–1463.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., & Damasio, H. (2002). Decision-making and addiction (part I): Impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia, 40(10), 1675–1689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123(11), 2189–2202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Dolan, S., Denburg, N., Hindes, A., Anderson, S. W., & Nathan, P. E. (2001). Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers. Neuropsychologia, 39(4), 376–389.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Dolan, S., & Hindes, A. (2002). Decision-making and addiction (part II): Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Neuropsychologia, 40(10), 1690–1705.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96(1), 73–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., Yi, R., Landes, R. D., Hill, P. F., & Baxter, C. (2011). Remember the future: Working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biological Psychiatry, 69(3), 260–265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., Moody, L., & Quisenberry, A. (2014). Computerized working-memory training as a candidate adjunctive treatment for addiction. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 36(1), 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. C., & Rosen, M. I. (2011). A money management-based substance use treatment increases valuation of future rewards. Addictive Behaviors, 36(1), 125–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolla, K. I., Eldreth, D. A., Matochik, J. A., & Cadet, J. L. (2004). Sex-related differences in a gambling task and its neurological correlates. Cerebral Cortex, 14(11), 1226–1232.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, M., Labudda, K., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2006). Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations. Neural Networks, 19(8), 1266–1276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K. M., Kiluk, B. D., Nich, C., Babuscio, T. A., Brewer, J. A., Potenza, M. N., Ball, S. A., Martino, S., Rounsaville, B. J., & Lejuez, C. W. (2011). Cognitive function and treatment response in a randomized clinical trial of computer-based training in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Substance Use & Misuse, 46(1), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casaletto, K. B., Moore, D. J., Woods, S. P., Umlauf, A., Scott, J., & Heaton, R. K. (2016). Abbreviated goal management training shows preliminary evidence as a neurorehabilitation tool for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders among substance users. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(1), 107–130.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Robbins, T. W., Ersche, K. D., & Sahakian, B. J. (2006). Reflection impulsivity in current and former substance users. Biological Psychiatry, 60(5), 515–522.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, M. J., Braams, B. R., Clark, L., Tobler, P. N., Robbins, T. W., & Kalenscher, T. (2013). Restricting temptations: Neural mechanisms of precommitment. Neuron, 79(2), 391–401.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). Model-based influences on humans' choices and striatal prediction errors. Neuron, 69(6), 1204–1215.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, D. M., Bigelow, G. E., Brigham, G. S., Carroll, K. M., Cohen, A. J., Gardin, J. G., Hamilton, J. A., Huestis, M. A., Hughes, J. R., Lindblad, R., Marlatt, G. A., Preston, K. L., Selzer, J. A., Somoza, E. C., Wakim, P. G., & Wells, E. A. (2012). Primary outcome indices in illicit drug dependence treatment research: Systematic approach to selection and measurement of drug use end-points in clinical trials. Addiction, 107(4), 694–708.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein Ewing, S. W., Filbey, F. M., Hendershot, C. S., McEachern, A. D., & Hutchison, K. E. (2011). Proposed model of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying psychosocial alcohol interventions: The example of motivational interviewing. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(6), 903–916.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Serrano, M. J., Pérez-García, M., & Verdejo-García, A. (2011). What are the specific vs. generalized effects of drugs of abuse on neuropsychological performance? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 377–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, R., Vandermeer, B. W., Shamliyan, T. A., O’Neil, M. E., Yazdi, F., Fox, S. H., Morton, S. C. (2013). Handling continuous outcomes in quantitative synthesis. Methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews. AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC103-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

  • Gladwin, T. E., Wiers, C. E., & Wiers, R. W. (2017). Interventions aimed at automatic processes in addiction: Considering necessary conditions for efficacy. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 13, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, P. D., Ometto, M., Bechara, A., Malbergier, A., Amaral, R., Nicastri, S., Martins, P. A., Beraldo, L., dos Santos, B., Fuentes, D., Andrade, A. G., Busatto, G. F., & Cunha, P. J. (2014). Motivational interviewing combined with chess accelerates improvement in executive functions in cocaine dependent patients: A one-month prospective study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 141, 79–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., & van den Brink, W. (2005). Decision making in pathological gambling: A comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(1), 137–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, S., Contoreggi, C., & London, E. D. (2000). Drug abusers show impaired performance in a laboratory test of decision making. Neuropsychologia, 38(8), 1180–1187.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, G. M. (2009). Addiction: A disorder of choice: Harvard University Press.

  • Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., et al. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343(oct18 2), d5928.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. D., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2012). Estimating the subjective value of future rewards: Comparison of adjusting-amount and adjusting-delay procedures. Behavioural Processes, 90(3), 302–310.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, J. D., Gould, R. L., Liu, K., Smith, M., & Howard, R. J. (2015). Do cognitive interventions improve general cognition in dementia? A meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMJ Open, 5(4), e005247. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., Bickel, W. K., & Baker, F. (2007). Moderate drug use and delay discounting: A comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15(2), 187–194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiluk, B. D., Buck, M. B., Devore, K. A., Babuscio, T. A., Nich, C., & Carroll, K. M. (2017). Performance-based contingency management in cognitive remediation training: A pilot study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 72, 80–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 75–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, B., Stuss, D. T., Winocur, G., Binns, M. A., Fahy, L., Mandic, M., Bridges, K., & Robertson, I. H. (2007). Cognitive rehabilitation in the elderly: Effects on strategic behavior in relation to goal management. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(1), 143–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, B., Schweizer, T. A., O'Connor, C., Turner, G., Gillingham, S., Stuss, D. T., Manly, T., & Robertson, I. H. (2011). Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5.

  • Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., Clarke, M., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2700.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, V., Verdejo-Garcia, A., & Lubman, D. I. (2017). Neurocognitive impairment in addiction and opportunities for intervention. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 13, 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, R., Josef, A. K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Age differences in risky choice: A meta-analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 18–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noël, X., Brevers, D., & Bechara, A. (2013). A neurocognitive approach to understanding the neurobiology of addiction. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(4), 632–638.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic reviews, 5(1), 210.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, E. N., Petry, N. M., LaPaglia, D. M., Reynolds, B., & Carroll, K. M. (2013). Delay discounting in adults receiving treatment for marijuana dependence. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(1), 46–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rass, O., Schacht, R. L., Buckheit, K., Johnson, M. W., Strain, E. C., & Mintzer, M. Z. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of the effects of working memory training in methadone maintenance patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 156, 38–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., & Johnson, A. (2008). Addiction as vulnerabilities in the decision process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(4), 461–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., & Schiffbauer, R. (2004). Measuring state changes in human delay discounting: An experiential discounting task. Behavioural Processes, 67(3), 343–356.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rezapour, T., DeVito, E. E., Sofuoglu, M., & Ekhtiari, H. (2016). Perspectives on neurocognitive rehabilitation as an adjunct treatment for addictive disorders: From cognitive improvement to relapse prevention. Progress in Brain Research, 224, 345–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363(1507), 3137–3146.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebener, J., & Brand, M. (2015). Decision making under objective risk conditions–a review of cognitive and emotional correlates, strategies, feedback processing, and external influences. Neuropsychology Review, 25(2), 171–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoptaw, S. (2014). Commentary on Gowin et al.(2014): Brain is behavior—Methamphetamine dependence and recovery. Addiction, 109(2), 248–249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanger, C., Budney, A. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2013). A developmental perspective on neuroeconomic mechanisms of contingency management. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(2), 403–415.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L., Goudriaan, A., Verdejo-Garcia, A., Dom, G., Roeyers, H., & Vanderplasschen, W. (2015). Impulsive choice predicts short-term relapse in substance-dependent individuals attending an in-patient detoxification programme. Psychological Medicine, 45(10), 2083–2093.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. L., Flagan, T. M., May, A. C., Reske, M., Simmons, A. N., & Paulus, M. P. (2013). Young adults at risk for stimulant dependence show reward dysfunction during reinforcement-based decision making. Biological Psychiatry, 73(3), 235–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. L., Butt, M., May, A. C., Tapert, S. F., & Paulus, M. P. (2017). Insular and cingulate attenuation during decision making is associated with future transition to stimulant use disorder. Addiction, 112(9), 1567–1577.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakolian, E., & Abolghasemi, A. (2016). Effects of cognitive restructuring training on neurocognitive functions in opioid addicts. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 18(1), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T., Oram, C., Correll, C. U., Tsermentseli, S., & Stubbs, B. (2017). Analgesic effects of alcohol: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled experimental studies in healthy participants. The Journal of Pain, 18(5), 499–510.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffany, S. T., Friedman, L., Greenfield, S. F., Hasin, D. S., & Jackson, R. (2012). Beyond drug use: A systematic consideration of other outcomes in evaluations of treatments for substance use disorders. Addiction, 107(4), 709–718.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valls-Serrano, C., Caracuel, A., & Verdejo-Garcia, A. (2016). Goal management training and mindfulness meditation improve executive functions and transfer to ecological tasks of daily life in polysubstance users enrolled in therapeutic community treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 165, 9–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van de Ven, R. M., Murre, J. M., Veltman, D. J., & Schmand, B. A. (2016). Computer-based cognitive training for executive functions after stroke: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.

  • van den Bos, R., Homberg, J., & de Visser, L. (2013). A critical review of sex differences in decision-making tasks: Focus on the Iowa gambling task. Behavioural Brain Research, 238, 95–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdejo-Garcia, A. (2016). Cognitive training for substance use disorders: Neuroscientific mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 270–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdejo-García, A., & Bechara, A. (2009). A somatic marker theory of addiction. Neuropharmacology, 56, 48–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdejo-Garcia, A., Albein-Urios, N., Martinez-Gonzalez, J. M., Civit, E., De la Torre, R., & Lozano, O. (2014). Decision-making impairment predicts 3-month hair-indexed cocaine relapse. Psychopharmacology, 231(21), 4179–4187.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdejo-García, A., Chong, T. T.-J., Stout, J. C., Yücel, M., & London, E. D. (2018). Stages of dysfunctional decision-making in addiction. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 164, 99–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: A review. Psychological Research, 78(6), 803–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidberg, S., Landes, R. D., García-Rodríguez, O., Yoon, J. H., & Secades-Villa, R. (2015). Interaction effect of contingency management and sex on delay-discounting changes among treatment-seeking smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 23(5), 361–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wesley, M. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2014). Remember the future II: Meta-analyses and functional overlap of working memory and delay discounting. Biological Psychiatry, 75(6), 435–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (2016). ICD-11 Beta Draft: International Classification of Diseases. https://icd.who.int/dev11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1448597234.

  • Yao, Y.-W., Chen, P.-R., Chiang-shan, R. L., Hare, T. A., Li, S., Zhang, J.-T., et al. (2017). Combined reality therapy and mindfulness meditation decrease intertemporal decisional impulsivity in young adults with internet gaming disorder. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 210–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Verdejo-García.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verdejo-García, A., Alcázar-Córcoles, M.A. & Albein-Urios, N. Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review. Neuropsychol Rev 29, 79–92 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-018-9384-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-018-9384-6

Keywords

Navigation