Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment, healthcare utilization and outcomes in patients with glioblastoma in Ontario: a 10-year cohort study

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumour in adults. Receipt of adjuvant therapies has been shown to exert a significant positive effect on patient survival. Little is known however about how changes in standards of care and healthcare system factors, such as access, affect real-world outcomes. In this study, we provide an overview of GBM in Ontario and examine elements of care, including treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and overall survival, from 2010 to 2019, to interpret the impact of the changes in practice standards and expansion of the care network within this period.

Methods

Using linked health-administrative databases from Ontario, Canada, we conducted a population-based cohort study to examine the clinical and biological characteristics, treatment, and healthcare utilization patterns of adult GBM patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcomes were enrollment in adjuvant chemoradiation treatment and 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software (SAS).

Results

5392 patients were diagnosed with GBM in Ontario from 2010 to 2019 (58% male, 42% female). The median age at diagnosis was 64. Receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation within one year of diagnosis increased from 51% in 2010 to 63% in 2019. 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival for all patients remained stable, ranging between 40 and 43%, 15–19%, and 5–7%, respectively. For patients above the age of 65, however, 1-year survival increased from 19% in 2010 to 26% in 2019.

Interpretation

Regionalization enabled access to treatment closer to home for many patients. Over the last decade, receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation increased among elderly patients, but the improvement in 1-year overall survival over time was accounted for by sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Our findings support the efforts for regionalization of services to improve accessibility.

Conclusion

This Ontario-based study provides insight into the effect of practice evolution and healthcare utilization on the overall survival of patients with GBM. Overall survival for most patients with glioblastoma has remained stagnant over the past decade. Changes in treatment standards and expansion of access to treating centres have been associated with prolonged survival in elderly glioblastoma patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used for this study, derived from provincial health administrative databases and patient registries, are subject to privacy regulations. Efforts have been made to ensure the availability of anonymized datasets for research purposes, subject to compliance with relevant privacy laws and regulations. Requests for access to the data can be directed to the corresponding author for consideration. Summary statistics and aggregated findings will be made available in the published manuscript to facilitate transparency and reproducibility of the study's results.

References

  1. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G et al (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131(6):803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H et al (2019) CBTRUS Statistical Report: primary brain and other Central Nervous System tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016. Neuro Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v1–v100. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5):459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mauer M, Stupp R, Taphoorn MJ et al (2007) The prognostic value of health-related quality-of-life data in predicting survival in glioblastoma cancer patients: results from an international randomised phase III EORTC brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology groups, and NCIC Clinical Trials Group study. Br J Cancer 97(3):302–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bottomley A, Vanvoorden V, Flechtner H, Therasse P, EORTC Quality of Life Group EORTC Data Center (2003) The challenges and achievements involved in implementing quality of life research in cancer clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 39(3):275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00729-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry JR, Laperriere N, O’Callaghan CJ et al (2017) Short-course Radiation plus Temozolomide in Elderly patients with Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 376(11):1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pollom EL, Sborov KD, Soltys SG, Asch SM, Sudore RL, Aslakson RA (2018) Advance Care Planning needs in patients with Glioblastoma Undergoing Radiotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage 56(6):e6–e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.08.021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hendren S, Chin N, Fisher S et al (2011) Patients’ barriers to receipt of cancer care, and factors associated with needing more assistance from a patient navigator. J Natl Med Assoc 103(8):701–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30409-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams M, Treasure P, Greenberg D, Brodbelt A, Collins P (2016) Surgeon volume and 30 day mortality for brain tumours in England. Br J Cancer 115(11):1379–1382. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Barker FG 2nd, Curry WT Jr, Carter BS (2005) Surgery for primary supratentorial brain tumors in the United States, 1988 to 2000: the effect of provider caseload and centralization of care. Neuro Oncol 7(1):49–63. https://doi.org/10.1215/S1152851704000146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker EV, Davis FG (2019) CBTR founding affiliates. Malignant primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in Canada from 2009 to 2013. Neuro Oncol 21(3):360–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Weerasinghe A, Smith CR, Majpruz V et al (2018) Validity of administrative databases in comparison to medical charts for breast Cancer Treatment Data. J Cancer Epidemiol 2018:9218595. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9218595

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Statistics Canada Tables 17-10-0134-01 Population estimates, July 1, by health region and peer group, 2018 boundaries. https://doi.org/10.25318/1710013401-eng

  15. Voisin MR, Sasikumar S, Mansouri A, Zadeh G (2021) Incidence and prevalence of primary malignant brain tumours in Canada from 1992 to 2017: an epidemiologic study. CMAJ Open 9(4):E973–E979. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200295

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Marenco-Hillembrand L, Wijesekera O, Suarez-Meade P et al (2020) Trends in glioblastoma: outcomes over time and type of intervention: a systematic evidence based analysis. J Neurooncol 147(2):297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03451-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raphael MJ, Siemens DR, Booth CM (2019) Would regionalization of systemic Cancer Therapy improve the quality of Cancer Care? J Oncol Pract 15(7):349–356. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lopez Ramos C, Brandel MG, Steinberg JA et al (2019) The impact of traveling distance and hospital volume on post-surgical outcomes for patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 141(1):159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03022-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Longo CJ, Fitch M, Deber RB, Williams AP (2006) Financial and family burden associated with cancer treatment in Ontario, Canada. Support Care Cancer 14(11):1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0088-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smets T, Lawson TM, Grandin C, Jankovski A, Raftopoulos C (2013) Immediate post-operative MRI suggestive of the site and timing of glioblastoma recurrence after gross total resection: a retrospective longitudinal preliminary study. Eur Radiol 23(6):1467–1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2762-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamimi AF, Juweid M Epidemiology and outcome of Glioblastoma. In: De Vleeschouwer S (ed) Glioblastoma. Brisbane (AU): Codon; September 27, 2017

  22. Holdhoff M, Ye X, Blakeley JO et al (2012) Use of personalized molecular biomarkers in the clinical care of adults with glioblastomas. J Neurooncol 110(2):279–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0968-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X et al (2008) An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 321(5897):1807–1812. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chakrabarti I, Cockburn M, Cozen W, Wang YP, Preston-Martin S (2005) A population-based description of glioblastoma multiforme in Los Angeles County, 1974–1999. Cancer 104(12):2798–2806. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mackillop WJ, Zhang-Salomons J, Groome PA, Paszat L, Holowaty E (1997) Socioeconomic status and cancer survival in Ontario. J Clin Oncol 15(4):1680–1689. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Porter AB, Lachance DH, Johnson DR (2015) Socioeconomic status and glioblastoma risk: a population-based analysis. Cancer Causes Control 26(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0496-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kasl RA, Brinson PR, Chambless LB (2016) Socioeconomic status does not affect prognosis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Surg Neurol Int.;7(Suppl 11):S282-S290. Published 2016 May 6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.181985

  28. Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Bartfay E et al (2011) Effects of socioeconomic status on colon cancer treatment accessibility and survival in Toronto, Ontario, and San Francisco, California, 1996–2006. Am J Public Health 101(1):112–119. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.173112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kovic B, Xie F (2015) Economic evaluation of Bevacizumab for the First-Line treatment of newly diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme. J Clin Oncol 33(20):2296–2302. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Henriksson R, Asklund T, Poulsen HS (2011) Impact of therapy on quality of life, neurocognitive function and their correlates in glioblastoma multiforme: a review. J Neurooncol 104(3):639–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0565-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ng JCH, See AAQ, Ang TY, Tan LYR, Ang BT, King NKK (2019) Effects of surgery on neurocognitive function in patients with glioma: a meta-analysis of immediate post-operative and long-term follow-up neurocognitive outcomes. J Neurooncol 141(1):167–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03023-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Satoer D, Vork J, Visch-Brink E, Smits M, Dirven C, Vincent A (2012) Cognitive functioning early after surgery of gliomas in eloquent areas. J Neurosurg 117(5):831–838. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.7.JNS12263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee J, Park SH, Kim YZ (2018) Prognostic evaluation of neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma patients. Brain Tumor Res Treat 6(1):22–30. https://doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Armstrong TS, Vera-Bolanos E, Gning I et al (2011) The impact of symptom interference using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) on prediction of recurrence in primary brain tumor patients. Cancer 117(14):3222–3228. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lien K, Zeng L, Nguyen J et al (2011) FACT-Br for assessment of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for brain metastases: a literature review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11(6):701–708. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

KR is supported by the Ontario Graduate Scholarship. SD is supported by an Early Researcher Award from the Province of Ontario and the Keenan Chair in Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.R. and S.H. developed and carried out the experiment. S.H. developed the figures. K.R. and W.B. developed the manuscript. S.D. supervised the findings of this work. W.B., S.H. and S.D. revised and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunit Das.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This work was undertaken at OH(CCO), under the aegis of quality improvement. REB approval was obtained through Clinical Trials Ontario to allow student involvement in the work (CTO Project ID: 139; Identifying barriers to completion of adjuvant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: an exploratory study).

Conflict of interest

Sunit Das serves as the Provincial Lead for CNS Oncology at Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baqri, W., Rzadki, K., Habbous, S. et al. Treatment, healthcare utilization and outcomes in patients with glioblastoma in Ontario: a 10-year cohort study. J Neurooncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04690-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04690-7

Keywords

Navigation