Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating the annual frequency of synchronous brain metastasis in the United States 2010–2013: a population-based study

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brain metastases (BM) are one of the most common types of brain tumors and are a relatively common event in the disease process for several high-incidence cancer types, including breast and lung cancers. Historically, information on metastases including BM have not been collected as part of national cancer registration in the US, but BM at time of primary cancer diagnosis (SBM), is now collected by the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) system. Using data from 18 SEER registries from 2010 to 2013, we assessed the frequency of SBM at time of primary diagnosis in the US by site, histology group, sex, race, age, and insurance status. There were 1,634,954 total primary cancer cases in SEER from 2010 to 2013, 1.7% of which presented with SBM. The cancer type with the highest proportion of SBM was lung cancer (10.8% of cases with SBM), followed by esophageal (1.5%), kidney (1.4%), and melanoma (1.2%). SBM varied by age, sex, race, and insurance status for most histologies. Our results reflect the high proportion of patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer at late stages and present with SBM, in contrast to other common cancers in the US where SBM is less common. Demographic variation in molecular subtype and risk behavior may influence variation in SBM. BM is a relatively common event in late stage cancer and cause significant morbidity and mortality, and assessment of accurate population-based data is critical to estimate total disease burden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis FG, Dolecek TA, McCarthy BJ, Villano JL (2012) Toward determining the lifetime occurrence of metastatic brain tumors estimated from 2007 United States cancer incidence data. Neuro Oncol 14:1171–1177. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nathoo N, Chahlavi A, Barnett GH, Toms SA (2005) Pathobiology of brain metastases. J Clin Pathol 58:237–242. doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.013623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Villano JL, Durbin EB, Normandeau C, Thakkar JP, Moirangthem V, Davis FG (2015) Incidence of brain metastasis at initial presentation of lung cancer. Neuro Oncol 17:122–128. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gavrilovic IT, Posner JB (2005) Brain metastases: epidemiology and pathophysiology. J Neurooncol 75:5–14. doi:10.1007/s11060-004-8093-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox BD, Cheung VJ, Patel AJ, Suki D, Rao G (2011) Epidemiology of metastatic brain tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 22(1–6):v. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2010.08.007

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nayak L, Lee EQ, Wen PY (2012) Epidemiology of brain metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 14:48–54. doi:10.1007/s11912-011-0203-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng W, Zhang P, Zheng X, Chen M, Mao WM (2015) Incidence and treatment of brain metastasis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 21:5805–5812. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5805

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaal EC, Niel CG, Vecht CJ (2005) Therapeutic management of brain metastasis. Lancet Neurol 4:289–298. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70072-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker AE, Robins M, Weinfeld FD (1985) Epidemiology of brain tumors: the national survey of intracranial neoplasms. Neurology 35:219–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Counsell CE, Collie DA, Grant R (1996) Incidence of intracranial tumours in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1989–90. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 61:143–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schouten LJ, Rutten J, Huveneers HA, Twijnstra A (2002) Incidence of brain metastases in a cohort of patients with carcinoma of the breast, colon, kidney, and lung and melanoma. Cancer 94:2698–2705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE (2004) Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973–2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol 22:2865–2872. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M (2009) Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods 6:359–362. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goncalves PH, Peterson SL, Vigneau FD, Shore RD, Quarshie WO, Islam K, Schwartz AG, Wozniak AJ, Gadgeel SM (2016) Risk of brain metastases in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer: analysis of the Metropolitan Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. Cancer 122:1921–1927. doi:10.1002/cncr.30000

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rostami R, Mittal S, Rostami P, Tavassoli F, Jabbari B (2016) Brain metastasis in breast cancer: a comprehensive literature review. J Neurooncol 127:407–414. doi:10.1007/s11060-016-2075-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program (2015) Number of persons by race and hispanic ethnicity for SEER participants (2010 census data)

  17. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3)

  18. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program (2008) Site recode ICD-O-3/WHO definition. http://seer.cancer.gov/siterecode/icdo3_dwhoheme/index.html

  19. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program (2016) SEER*Stat software version 8.3.2. National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program. http://www.seer.cancer.gov/seerstat

  20. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/

  21. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York. http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/book

  22. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, Thun M (2004) Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 54:78–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Halpern MT, Ward EM, Pavluck AL, Schrag NM, Bian J, Chen AY (2008) Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 9:222–231. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70032-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bald T, Quast T, Landsberg J, Rogava M, Glodde N, Lopez-Ramos D, Kohlmeyer J, Riesenberg S, van den Boorn-Konijnenberg D, Homig-Holzel C, Reuten R, Schadow B, Weighardt H, Wenzel D, Helfrich I, Schadendorf D, Bloch W, Bianchi ME, Lugassy C, Barnhill RL, Koch M, Fleischmann BK, Forster I, Kastenmuller W, Kolanus W, Holzel M, Gaffal E, Tuting T (2014) Ultraviolet-radiation-induced inflammation promotes angiotropism and metastasis in melanoma. Nature 507:109–113. doi:10.1038/nature13111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lazovich D, Isaksson Vogel R, Weinstock MA, Nelson HH, Ahmed RL, Berwick M (2016) Association between indoor tanning and melanoma in younger men and women. JAMA Dermatol 152: 268–275 doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2938

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lasithiotakis K, Leiter U, Meier F, Eigentler T, Metzler G, Moehrle M, Breuninger H, Garbe C (2008) Age and gender are significant independent predictors of survival in primary cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 112:1795–1804. doi:10.1002/cncr.23359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Amini A, Rusthoven CG, Waxweiler TV, Jones BL, Fisher CM, Karam SD, Raben D (2016) Association of health insurance with outcomes in adults ages 18 to 64 years with melanoma in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 74:309–316. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Won YW, Joo J, Yun T, Lee GK, Han JY, Kim HT, Lee JS, Kim MS, Lee JM, Lee HS, Zo JI, Kim S (2015) A nomogram to predict brain metastasis as the first relapse in curatively resected non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 88:201–207. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.02.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Blackwell DL VM, Clarke TC (2015) Tables of summary health statistics for U.S. adults: 2013 National Health Interview Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/SHS/tables.htm

  31. Schwartz AG, Cote ML (2016) Epidemiology of lung cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 893:21–41. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24223-1_2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Benowitz NL, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, Swan GE, Jacob P 3rd (2006) Female sex and oral contraceptive use accelerate nicotine metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 79:480–488. doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2006.01.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gupta S, Hassan S, Bhatt VR, Abdul Sater H, Dilawari A (2014) Lung cancer trends: smoking, obesity, and sex assessed in the Staten Island University’s lung cancer patients. Int J Gen Med 7:333–337. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S55806

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Haiman CA, Stram DO, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Le Marchand L (2006) Ethnic and racial differences in the smoking-related risk of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 354:333–342. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa033250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wells A (2000) Tumor invasion: role of growth factor-induced cell motility. Adv Cancer Res 78:31–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shin DY, Lee DH, Kim CH, Koh JS, Lee JC, Baek HJ, Kim SW, Choi CM, Na, II (2016) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and brain metastasis in patients with nonadenocarcinoma of the lung. J Cancer Res Ther 12:318–322. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.154024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Han G, Bi J, Tan W, Wei X, Wang X, Ying X, Guo X, Zhou X, Hu D, Zhen W (2016) A retrospective analysis in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma: is EGFR mutation associated with a higher incidence of brain metastasis? Oncotarget. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.10933

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sirkisoon SR, Carpenter RL, Rimkus T, Miller L, Metheny-Barlow L, Lo HW (2016) EGFR and HER2 signaling in breast cancer brain metastasis. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 8:245–263

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shin DY, Na II, Kim CH, Park S, Baek H, Yang SH (2014) EGFR mutation and brain metastasis in pulmonary adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol 9:195–199. doi:10.1097/jto.0000000000000069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Maxwell R, Garzon-Muvdi T, Lipson EJ, Sharfman WH, Bettegowda C, Redmond KJ, Kleinberg LR, Ye X, Lim M (2016) BRAF-V600 mutational status affects recurrence patterns of melanoma brain metastasis. Int J Cancer. doi:10.1002/ijc.30241

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nussbaum ES, Djalilian HR, Cho KH, Hall WA (1996) Brain metastases. Histology, multiplicity, surgery, and survival. Cancer 78:1781–1788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for CBTRUS was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under Contract No. 200-2016-M-90304, The Sontag Foundation, Genentech, Novocure, Celldex, AbbVie, along with the Musella Foundation, Voices Against Cancer, and the Zelda Dorin Tetenbaum Memorial Fund, as well as private and in kind donations. Contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at University Hospitals Case Medical Center. For this type of study, formal consent was not required.

Informed consent

This was a retrospective study using de-identified national cancer registries. Thus, formal consent was not required.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 76 KB)

11060_2017_2516_MOESM2_ESM.png

Supplementary Figure 1. Type of Evaluation of any metastases by AJCC criteria for patients with SBM by A) site, B) lung cancer, and C) breast cancer subtype (Online Only) (PNG 40 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kromer, C., Xu, J., Ostrom, Q.T. et al. Estimating the annual frequency of synchronous brain metastasis in the United States 2010–2013: a population-based study. J Neurooncol 134, 55–64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2516-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2516-7

Keywords

Navigation