This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abbott A (2019) The science institutions hiring integrity inspectors to vet their papers. Nature 575(7783):430–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03529-w
Di Bitetti MS, Ferreras JA (2017) Publish (in English) or perish: the effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio 46:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0820-7
Ellis C, Zucker IM, Randall D (2018) The infernal business of contract cheating: understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites. Int J Educ Integr 14:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0024-3
Flowerdew J (2015) Some thoughts on English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP) and related issues. Lang Teach 48(2):250–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000523
Fogarty TJ (2009) Show me the money: academic research as currency. Acc Educ 18(1):3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280802554418
Hyland K (2016) Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. J Second Lang Writ 31:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) (n.d.) Defining the role of authors and contributors. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html;http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Last Updated: December, 2019; Last Accessed: February 10, 2021
Ingstrup MB, Aarikka-Stenroos L, Adlin N (2021) When institutional logics meet: alignment and misalignment in collaboration between academia and practitioners. Ind Market Manag 92:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.01.004
Kendall G, Yee A, McCollum B (2016) Is there a role for publication consultants and how should their contribution be recognized? Sci Eng Ethics 22:1553–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9710-9
Lane T, Tang J (2016) Publishing challenges faced by authors with English as a second language. Eur Sci Editing 42(2):36–38
Lozano GA (2014) Ethics of using language editing services in an era of digital communication and heavily multi-authored papers. Sci Eng Ethics 20:363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9451-6
Olafson L, Schraw G, Kehrwald N (2014) Academic dishonesty: behaviors, sanctions, and retention of adjudicated college students. J Coll Stud Dev 55(7):661–674. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0066
Pinna N, Clavel G, Roco MC (2020) The Journal of Nanoparticle Research victim of an organized rogue editor network! J Nanopart Res 22:376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-05094-0
Prager EM, Chambers KE, Plotkin JL, McArthur DL, Bandrowski AE, Bansal N, Martone ME, Bergstrom HC, Bespalov A, Graf C (2019) Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing. J Neurosci Res 97(4):377–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24340
Resnik DB, Shamoo AE (2017) Reproducibility and research integrity. Account Res 24(2):116–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1257387
Rezaeian M (2015) Disadvantages of publishing biomedical research articles in English for non-native speakers of English. Epidemiol Health 37:e2015021. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2015021
Seifert R (2021) How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 394:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-021-02056-8
Teixeira da Silva JA (2016) An error is an error… is an erratum. The ethics of not correcting errors in the science literature. Publ Res Q 32(3):220–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9469-0
Teixeira da Silva JA (2021) Paper mills and on-demand publishing: risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics. Med J Armed Forces India 77(1):119–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.003
Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J (2017) Notices and policies for retractions, expressions of concern, errata and corrigenda: their importance, content, and context. Sci Eng Ethics 23(2):521–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9769-y
Teixeira da Silva JA, Al-Khatib A, Katavić V, Bornemann-Cimenti H (2018) Establishing sensible and practical guidelines for desk rejections. Sci Eng Ethics 24(4):1347–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9921-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has provided voluntary and paid editing English and scientific revision services. Apart from this, the author declares no other relevant conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. Outsourced English revision, editing, publication consultation, and integrity services should be acknowledged in an academic paper. J Nanopart Res 23, 81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-021-05199-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-021-05199-0