Skip to main content
Log in

Multibody dynamics as a tool for historical research

Study of an 18th century piano action of Johann Andreas Stein

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ancient musical instruments can tell us much about the way composers of the past centuries wrote their music. Indeed, the sound and playing characteristics of historical instruments are often very different from those of the instruments we are used to. For example, in the case of the Viennese piano actions used by Mozart and his contemporaries, the so-called “escapement height” largely conditions the response of the instrument to the pianist’s touch. In this contribution, we aim to define how the Viennese action behaves when the escapement height, usually tuned by piano technicians, is changed.

To do this, a multibody model containing the frame, the key, the hammer, the pawl, and the string has been developed. This paper describes how the model has been carried out; a special focus is put on the detection of the intermittent contacts between bodies, which may look easy in the real action, but is rather complex to model. The model is compared with high-speed imaging data and a parametric study of the escapement height is performed by adjusting the rest position of the pawl. The high sensitivity of this regulation is revealed as a shift of 1 mm of the pawl seems to induce a displacement of the escapement height of 20 mm. It is also shown that a strong but linear decrease of the maximal force between the hammer and the string appears when the escapement height increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The practice of “historically informed performances” consists in playing music while being aware of the historical background of its composition and performance. This usually implies that the piece of music is played on instruments contemporary of the music itself.

  2. Note that changing the spring preload not only changes its behavior during the motion of the action, but also changes the rest position of pawl, just like the first type of regulation.

  3. In later Viennese actions, the stop is an adjustable screw, which makes its regulation easier. Nonetheless, fine regulation can still be performed with pieces of paper.

  4. Let us recall that the key is depressed with a 100 g mass, causing a movement that cannot be considered as quasi-static anymore.

References

  1. Gillespie, B.: Haptic display of systems with changing kinematic constraints the virtual piano action. PhD thesis, Stanford University (1996)

  2. Hirschkorn, M.C.: Dynamic model of a piano action mechanism. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo (2004)

  3. Izadbakhsh, A.: Dynamics and control of a piano action mechanism. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo (2006)

  4. Vyasarayani, C.P.: Transient dynamics of continuous systems with impact and friction, with applications to musical instruments. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo (2009)

  5. Maniguet, T., Mamou-Mani, A.: Investigating the history of the piano action using scientific calculus: The case of an Érard grand piano from 1802. In: 5th Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology, Paris, pp. 122–123 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Masoudi, R.: Micromechanics of fiber networks including nonlinear hysteresis and its application to multibody dynamic modeling of piano mechanisms. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo (2012)

  7. Thorin, A.: Non-smooth model of the grand piano action. PhD thesis, École Polytechnique - Université Paris-Saclay (2013)

  8. Birkett, S.: Observing the 18th-century Prellzüngenmechanik through high-speed imaging—pianissimo and forte response compared. In: Cordes et Claviers au Temps de Mozart, Actes des Rencontres Internationales Harmoniques, Lausanne, 2006, pp. 305–326. Peter Lang, Berne (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Docquier, N., Poncelet, A., Fisette, P.: ROBOTRAN: A powerful symbolic generator of multibody models. Mech. Sci. 4(1), 199–219 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunt, K.H., Crosley, F.R.E.: Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. J. Appl. Mech. 42(2), 440–445 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cull, S.J., Tucker, R.W.: On the modelling of Coulomb friction. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 32(11), 2103–2113 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Musical Instruments Museum Brussels for its help, and more particularly Pierre Gevaert, the piano technician of the museum.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baudouin Bokiau.

Additional information

This research is funded by the FNRS-FRESH Fonds de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bokiau, B., Ceulemans, AE. & Fisette, P. Multibody dynamics as a tool for historical research. Multibody Syst Dyn 37, 15–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-015-9498-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-015-9498-z

Keywords

Navigation