Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

M2S2-FNet: Multi-scale, Multi-stream feature network with Attention mechanism for classification of breast histopathological image

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer type, especially in women. Identifying the subtype of malignant (cancer) lesions can help to give proper treatment to cancer patients. The subtype of benign lesions can help to estimate the risk of developing cancer in the future. The computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is an automated and more precise method for histopathological image classification. With the recent development in computer vision and deep learning, advanced convolution neural networks have achieved great success in image classification and widely used in medical image processing. This paper proposes a deep based multi-scale multi-stream feature network (M2S2-FNet) with attention mechanism for classification H&E stained breast histopathological microscopy image either as benign or malignant, and then categorizing malignant and benign cases into four different subtypes each. The proposed network processes the patch of breast cancer image through each multi-scale multi-stream to extract the robust; and refined features from the attention module. The proposed M2S2-FNet follows the knowledge of sharing strategy by sharing learned features at each stream across the network and the attention mechanism. M2S2-FNet achieved an accuracy for different magnification factors (× 40, × 100, × 200, and × 400) but the superior accuracy i.e. 98.07% for multi-class and 99.60% for binary at × 200. Accuracy, performance measure parameters like Recall, Precision and Sensitivity etc. and weight of M2S2-FNet model were better than existing models like VGG16, Xception, ResNet152 and BreastNet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sung H et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nover, AB, Jagtap, S, Anjum, W, Yegingil, H, Shih, WY, Shih, WH, Brooks, AD (2009) Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review. J Biomed Imaging, 1–142009. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/902326

  3. Yang Z, Ran L, Zhang S, Xia Y, Zhang Y (2019) EMS-Net: Ensemble of multiscale convolutional neural networks for classification of breast cancer histology images. Neurocomputing 366(46–5):2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Screening, PDQ, Board, PE (2022) Breast Cancer Screening (PDQ®). In PDQ Cancer Information Summaries [Internet]. Nat Cancer Inst (US)

  5. Allison KH et al (2015) Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: a report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Cancer 121(9):1369–1378. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamidinekoo A et al (2018) Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends. Med Image Anal 47:45–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Allison KH et al (2014) Understanding diagnostic variability in breast pathology: lessons learned from an expert consensus review panel. Histopathol 65(2):240–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elmore JG et al (2016) Variability in pathologists’ interpretations of individual breast biopsy slides: a population perspective. Annals Internal Med 164(10):649–655. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-0964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coracin F et al (2019) Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting oral mucosal biopsies from individuals affected by GVHD. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 128(1):e36–e37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.02.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gandomkar Z, Brennan PC, Mello-Thoms C (2016) Computer-based image analysis in breast pathology. J Pathol Inf 7(1):43. https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.192814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Niwas, SI, Palanisamy P, Sujathan K (2010) Wavelet based feature extraction method for breast cancer cytology images. in 2010 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA). IEEE

  12. Weyn B, Van De Wouwer G, Van Daele A, Scheunders P, Van Dyck D, Van Marck E, Jacob W (1998) Automated breast tumor diagnosis and grading based on wavelet chromatin texture description. Cytometry: The Journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology 33(1):32–40

  13. Liu Z, Zhang X-S, Zhang S (2014) Breast tumor subgroups reveal diverse clinical prognostic power. Sci Rep 4(1):1–9

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo Y et al (2018) Improvement of cancer subtype prediction by incorporating transcriptome expression data and heterogeneous biological networks. BMC Med Genomics 11(6):87–98

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guray M, Sahin AA (2006) Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management. Oncologist 11(5):435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ker J et al (2017) Deep learning applications in medical image analysis. Ieee Access 6:9375–9389. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2788044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta P, Garg S (2020) Breast cancer prediction using varying parameters of machine learning models. Procedia Computer Science 171:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akay MF (2009) Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Exp Syst Appl 36(2):3240–3247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gandomkar Z, Brennan PC, Mello-Thoms C (2018) MuDeRN: Multi-category classification of breast histopathological image using deep residual networks. Artif Intell Med 88:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2018.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, C, et al. (2017) Histopathological image classification with bilinear convolutional neural networks. in 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037745

  21. Hasan, S (2019) Deep Layer CNN Architecture for Breast Cancer Histopathology Image Detection. in The International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (AMLTA2019). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14118-9_5

  22. Toğaçar M et al (2020) BreastNet: A novel convolutional neural network model through histopathological images for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Physica A: Stat Mech Appl 545:123592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Benhammou Y et al (2020) BreakHis based breast cancer automatic diagnosis using deep learning: Taxonomy, survey and insights. Neurocomputing 375:9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.09.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D., ... & Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–9

  25. Woo, S, et al. (2018) Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. in Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). pp 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1

  26. Lin, M, Chen Q, Yan S (2013) Network in network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.4400

  27. Srivastava N et al (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The J Mach Learn Res 15(1):1929–1958

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Powers, DM (2020) Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.16061. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.16061

  29. Bai X, Wang X, Liu X, Liu Q, Song J, Sebe N, Kim B (2021) Explainable deep learning for efficient and robust pattern recognition: A survey of recent developments. Pattern Recogn 120(108102):2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.108102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng X, Kadry S, Meqdad MN, Crespo RG (2022) CNN supported framework for automatic extraction and evaluation of dermoscopy images. J Supercomput 78(15):17114–17131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04561-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmad N, Asghar S, Gillani SA (2022) Transfer learning-assisted multi-resolution breast cancer histopathological images classification. Vis Comput 38(8):2751–2770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-021-02153-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zou Y, Zhang J, Huang S, Liu B (2021) Breast cancer histopathological image classification using attention high-order deep network. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 32(1):266–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Majumdar S, Pramanik P, Sarkar R (2023) Gamma function based ensemble of CNN models for breast cancer detection in histopathology images. Expert Syst Appl 213:119022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li G, Wu G, Xu G, Li C, Zhu Z, Ye Y, Zhang H (2023) Pathological image classification via embedded fusion mutual learning. Biomed Signal Process Control 79(104181):2022

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kar MK, Neog DR, Nath MK (2023) Retinal vessel segmentation using multi-scale residual convolutional neural network (MSR-Net) combined with generative adversarial networks. Circuits Systems Signal Process 42(2):1206–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-022-02190-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Surwase S, Pawar M (2023) Multi-scale multi-stream deep network for car logo recognition. Evol Intell 16(2):485–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00671-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pawer, MM, Pujari, SD, Pawar, SP, Talbar, SN (2022) MuSCF-Net: Multi-scale, Multi-Channel Feature Network Using Resnet-based Attention Mechanism for Breast Histopathological Image Classification. In Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Medical Science (pp. 243–261). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003217497-14

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suvarna D. Pujari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pujari, S.D., Pawer, M.M. & Pawar, S.P. M2S2-FNet: Multi-scale, Multi-stream feature network with Attention mechanism for classification of breast histopathological image. Multimed Tools Appl (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17717-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17717-4

Keywords

Navigation