Skip to main content
Log in

Homomorphic technique for image separation

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Signal Image separation is a significant processing task for accurate image reconstruction, which is increasingly applied to several medical imaging applications and communication areas. Most of classical separation approaches exploit frequency and time domains. These approaches, however are sensitive to noise, and thus often lead to undesirable results. In this paper, we propose a novel method of image separation. It incorporates the property of reflectance component extracted from the image and a Finite Ridgelet Transform (FRT) to obtain precise analysis of the images and thus correctly separate the images even in hardly noisy environment. We obtain the reflectance components of the target images by employing a homomorphic processing, which operates in the log domain, and thus can decompose the image into illumination and reflectance components. In addition, the homomorphic decomposition in the proposed method reduces information redundancy in the target image, and thus substantially improve the quality of image separation. We carried out extensive simulations, which demonstrate that the proposed homomorphic technique outperforms the conventional methods based on time domain and trigonometric transforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Abbass MY, Kim HW (2018) Blind image separation using pyramid technique. EURASIP J Image Video Process 2018:38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Almeida MSC, Almeida LB (2008) Wavelet-based separation of nonlinear show-through and bleed-through image mixtures. Neurocomputing 72(1–3):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almeida MSC, Almeida LB (2012) Nonlinear separation of show-through image mixtures using a physical model trained with ICA. Signal Process 92:872–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belouchrani A, Abed-Meraim K, Cardoso JF, Moulines E (1997) A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Trans Signal Process 45:434–444

  5. Abbass MY, Kwon KC, Kim N et al (2021) A survey on online learning for visual tracking. Vis Comput 37:993–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-020-01848-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozgen MT, Kuruoglu EE, Herranz D (2009) Astrophysical image separation by blind time-frequency source separation methods. Digit Signal Process 2009:360–369

  7. Candes EJ, Donoho DL (1999) Ridgelets: a key to higher dimensional intermittency? Philos Trans R Soc Lond A357:2459–2509

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Candes EJ, Donoho DL Curvelets, Tech. report. Department of Statistics, Stanford University

  9. Candes EJ, Donoho DL (2000) Curvelets: a surprisingly effective nonadaptive representation for objects with edges. Stanford Univ Ca Dept of Statistics

  10. Cardoso JF, Laheld B (1996) Equivariant adaptive source separation. IEEE Trans Signal Process 44:3017–3030

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Comon P, Jutten C (2010) Handbook of blind source separation: independent component analysis and applications. Academic, New York, pp 779–814

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elashry IF, Farag Allah OS, Abbas AM, El-Rabaie S, Abd El-Samie FE (2009) Homomorphic image encryption. J Electron Imag 18(3):033002. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3167847

  13. Abbass, M.Y., Kwon, KC., Alam, M.S. et al. Image super resolution based on residual dense CNN and guided filters. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 5403–5421 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09824-3

  14. Hammam H, Elazm AA, Elhalawany ME et al (2010) Blind separation of audio signals using trigonometric transforms and wavelet denoising. Int J Speech Technol 13:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-010-9066-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbass MY, Kim H, Abdelwahab SA et al (2019) Image deconvolution using homomorphic technique. SIViP 13:703–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-018-1399-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu C, Xu Z et al (2014) Semantic link network based model for organizing multimedia big data. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput 2:376–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang Q, Hao B, Chang S (2016) Adaptive digital ridgelet transform and its application in image denoising. Digit Signal Process 52:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hyvärinen A (1999) Survey on independent component analysis. Neural Comput Surveys 2:94–128

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hyvärinen A, Oja E (1997) A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Comput 9(7):1483–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hyvärinen A, Oja E (2000) Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw 13(4–5):411–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim S, Yoo CD (2009) Underdetermined blind source separation based on subspace representation. IEEE Trans Signal Process 57:2604–2614

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li XL, Adali T (2010) Independent component analysis by entropy bound minimization. IEEE Trans Signal Process 58(10):5151–5164

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Abbass MY, Kwon KC, Kim N, Abdelwahab SA, Abd El-Samie FE, Khalaf AAM (2020d) Utilization of deep convolutional and handcrafted features for object tracking. Optik 218:164926

  24. Ozgen MT, Kuruoglu EE, Herranz D (2009) Astrophysical image separation by blind time-frequency source separation methods. Digit Signal Process 19:360–369

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rao KR, Yip P (1990) Discrete cosine transform. Academic, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Starck J-L, Candès EJ, Donoho DL (2002) The curvelet transform for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 11:670–684

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker JS (1999) A primer on wavelets and their scientific applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  28. Abbass MY, Sadic N, Ashiba HI et al (2022) An efficient technique for non-uniformity correction of infrared video sequences with histogram matching. J Electr Eng Technol 17:2971–2983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01010-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei Y, Wang Y (2016) Dynamic blind source separation based on source-direction prediction. Neurocomputing 185:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiao L, Li C, Wu Z, Wang T (2016) An enhancement method for X-ray image via fuzzy noise removal and homomorphic filtering. Neurocomputing 195:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu X-c, Xu J-d, Hu D, Xing H-h (2013) A new blind image source separation algorithm based on feedback sparse component analysis. Signal Processing 93:288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu XC, Xu JD, Hu D (2013) A new blind image source separation algorithm based on feedback sparse component analysis. Signal Process 93:288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang H, Wang G, Cai P, Wu Z, Ding S (2014) A fast blind source separation algorithm based on the temporal structure of signals. Neurocomputing 139:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Y, Yang D, Qi R et al (2016) Blind image separation based on reorganization of block DCT. Multimed Tools Appl 75:12101–12121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3397-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not Applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Y. Abbass.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not Applicable.

Conflict of interest

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbass, M.Y. Homomorphic technique for image separation. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 18639–18648 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15155-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15155-w

Keywords

Navigation