Abstract
We present our experience and initial results of single-station observation using the new fish-eye TV system, as well as double station TV observation of the Geminids 2006 shower. The fixed fish-eye TV system was developed for monitoring meteor activity throughout the year. We discuss the astrometric precision of our observations using the UFOAnalyser software.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
For more than 15 years, astrometric and photometric observations of asteroids and comets have been made at the Astronomical and Geophysical Observatory (AGO) of the Comenius University in Modra, as well as all-sky photographic meteor observations using Zeiss Distagon photographic cameras fitted with 3.5/30 mm fish-eye lenses (Zigo et al. 2006; Gajdoš et al. 2006). Two photographic meteor cameras operate at the site, one in fixed and another in a guided mode. Our station No. 21 Modra (Fig. 1a) is a part of the European Network (EN) for fireball detection coordinated by Ondřejov Observatory, Czech Republic. In the past, we had used TV cameras for major meteor shower observations (Tóth and Kornoš 2007). Recently we have developed a new fish-eye TV system to be used mainly for minor meteor shower observations.
2 The Fish-eye TV System
The new fish-eye TV meteor system (Fig. 1b) has started regular observations on April 1, 2007. The system consists of a fish-eye Canon 2.4/15 mm objective, 2″ Mullard image intensifier, Meopta 1.9/16 mm lens and a Watec 120N camera. The analog video signal is digitized in real time and analysed by “UFOCapture" software (author SonotaCo, http://www.sonotaco.com/e_index.html), which is able to detect any moving object including meteors. The resolution of the system is 720 × 540 (15 arcmin/px), corresponding to a field of view of 170° × 140° (Fig. 2). The limiting stellar magnitude is +5.5m and meteors up to magnitude +3m are detected. The system operates autonomously.
The astrometric precision of this fish-eye TV system is quite good. The standard deviation for more than 50 stars reduced by the “UFOAnalyserV2" is less than 0.05° for zenithal distances up to 60°. Also we have tested the position accuracy for several stars and planets near the horizon, where the astrometric precision of the measurement decreases to 0.5°. The fourth order polynomial expansion used by UFOAnalyserV2 is insufficient to correct fish-eye projection, especially near horizon.
3 Results
3.1 April 2007 Results
Our TV system, operating as a single station worked 27 nights (199 h) during April 2007, including nights with a bright Moon. In total 300 meteors were detected: 74 Lyrids, 24 meteors from antihelion source, 10 meteors from helion source, 20 meteors from other sources and 172 other sporadics. The identification of Lyrids were based in their radiant position and angular velocity. The sporadic meteor frequency was in the range of 0.5–3 meteors per hour, depending on the Moon phase, which reduced meteor rates due to the bright background of the sky. During this month, TV and photographic fish-eye cameras observed 7 fireballs. The brightest fireball was about −10th magnitude. The orbit of the “Kozmice" fireball from April 14 was also observed by our TV system and the EN photographic cameras for which Spurný (pers. comm. 2007) calculated its precise orbit as a = 1.2780 ± 0.0007 AU, e = 0.5073 ± 0.0003, q = 0.62961 ± 0.00014 AU, Q = 1.9263 ± 0.0014 AU, ω = 276.09° ± 0.03°, Ω = 24.36223° ± 0.00001°, i = 7.934° ± 0.009°. The meteoroid, which had photometric mass of 3 kg, has a typical NEO orbit of Apollo type. The observed astrometric position of the fireball by TV and photographic method from Modra station correspond to each other within 3 arcmin.
3.2 Single Station Observations of the 2007 Lyrids
We observed the Lyrid activity for the period April 10–26. The activity profile during the night of maximum activity (April 22/23) was derived from fish-eye TV single station observations that were corrected to the radiant position (Fig. 3a). The discrepancy between our video and the IMO visual data for the Lyrid ZHRs is mainly caused by the Moon light, which reduced meteor rates during the first part of the night. We also obtained a single station radiant position at the time of maximum activity (α = 272.5°, δ = 33.2°, \(\lambda_{\odot} =33.2^\circ)\) for these 74 Lyrids (Fig. 3b). The diameter of the radiant area from the entire activity interval was 10°. The faintest observed Lyrid meteor was about magnitude +3m and the brightest one was about −6th magnitude.
3.3 Two Station Orbits from the 2006 Geminids
The activity of the Geminid meteor shower was monitored from two stations at Modra and Stupava that were both equipped with test non-intensified cameras (details in Tóth and Kornoš 2007) with 20° field of view.
Tóth and Kornoš (2007) presented the activity profile that was derived for this TV system and found that maximum activity peaked at 1:30 ± 0:30 UT December 14, 2006 and the single station radiant position was α = 114.0°, δ = 33.3°.
The radiant area derived from 31 Geminid meteor observations is very compact (less than 1°). This is indirect confirmation of the astrometric precision of “UFOAnalyser” software, because Geminids are very well known for their compact radiant. Six Geminids were simultaneously observed from both stations. The heliocentric orbits for the two brightest meteors were computed by the “UFOOrbit" software (Table 1).
4 Conclusions
We described our first experience with the new fish-eye TV system as well as the “UFOCapture", “UFOAnalyser" and “UFOOrbit" software. We are able to capture meteor activity under suitable conditions and provide reliable data, although we do not have permanent and identical second station yet. We hope we will be able to provide TV meteor orbital data on the regular bases in the near future.
References
G. Barentsen, Lyrids 2007: first results http://www.imo.net/live/ lyrids2007 (2007)
Š. Gajdoš, D. Kalmančok, P. Zigo, P. Kolény, L. Kornoš, J. Tóth, A. Galád, M. Šebeň, J. Világi, EN station no. 21 – operation and results after 15 years of activity. Meteor Report 27, 83–90 (English abstract) (2006)
J. Oberst, S. Molau, D. Heinlein, C. Gritzner, M. Schindler, P. Spurný, Z. Ceplecha, J. Rendtel, H. Betlem, The “European Fireball Network": current status and future prospects. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 33, 49–54 (1998)
J. Tóth, L. Kornoš, in Single and Double Station Meteor Observations Setups in Modra, Slovakia, eds. J. Mc Auliffe, D. Koschny. Proceedings of the First Europlanet Workshop on Meteor Orbit Determination 2006, Roden, The Netherlands, 11–13 September 2006, (International Meteor Organization, 2007), pp. 46–52
P. Zigo, Š. Gajdoš, J. Tóth, in Meteor observations at Modra Observatory, eds. L. Bastiaens, J. Verbert, J.-M. Wislez, C. Verbeeck. Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, Oostmalle, Belgium, 15-18 September, 2005, IMO, Belgium, (2006), pp. 37–41
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency VEGA, grant No. 1/3067/06 and by Comenius University grant UK/401/2007. Authors are thankful to A. Galád, P. Kolény and M. Šebeň for valuable help with observations and construction of the TV system and also to Prof. Frans J. Rietmeijer and Dr. Margaret Campbell-Brown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tóth, J., Kornoš, L., Gajdoš, Š. et al. TV Meteor Observations from Modra. Earth Moon Planet 102, 257–261 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11038-007-9160-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11038-007-9160-8