Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal expression analysis of microRNAs and their target GRAS genes induced by osmotic stress in two contrasting wheat genotypes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important nonprotein-coding genes in plants which participate in almost all biological processes during abiotic and biotic stresses. Understanding how plants respond to various environmental conditions requires the identification of stress-related miRNAs. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in studying miRNA genes and gene expression. Drought is one of the common environmental stresses limiting plant growth and development. Stress-specific miRNAs and their GRAS gene targets were validated to understand the role of miRNAs in response to osmotic stress.

Results

In this study, expression patterns of the ten stress-responsive miRNAs involved in osmotic stress adaptation were examined in order to undertand the regulation behavior of abiotic stress and miRNAs in two contrasting wheat genotype C-306 (drought tolerant) and WL-711 (drought sensitive). Three miRNAs were discovered to be upregulated under stress, whereas seven miRNAs were showed to be down-regulated as a consequence of the study. In contrast to miRNA, it was also discovered that GRAS genes as their targets were up-regulated during osmotic stress. In addition, the expression level of miR159, miR408 along with their targets, TaGRAS178 and TaGRAS84 increased in response to osmotic stress. Nevertheless, miR408 is highly conserved miRNA that regulates plant growth, development and stress response. As a result, variation in the expression levels of studied miRNAs in the presence of target genes provides a plausible explanation for miRNA-based abiotic stress regulation. A regulatory network of miRNA and their targets revealed that fourteen miRNA interact with 55 GRAS targets from various subfamilies that contribute in the plant growth and development.

Conclusions

These findings provide evidence for temporal and variety-specific differential regulation of miRNAs and their targets in wheat in response to osmotic shock, and they may aid in determining the potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAO (2020) Crop prospects and food situation—Quaterly Global Report

  2. Kajla M, Yadav VK, Khokhar J et al (2015) Increase in wheat production through management of abiotic stresses: a review. J Appl Nat Sci 7:1070–1080. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i2.733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. González Guzmán M, Cellini F, Fotopoulos V et al (2022) New approaches to improve crop tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiol Plant 174:100. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sallam A, Alqudah AM, Dawood MFA et al (2019) Drought stress tolerance in wheat and barley: advances in physiology, breeding and genetics research. Int J Mol Sci 20:100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Samad AFA, Sajad M, Nazaruddin N et al (2017) MicroRNA and transcription factor: key players in plant regulatory network. Front Plant Sci 8:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boeva V (2016) Analysis of genomic sequence motifs for deciphering transcription factor binding and transcriptional regulation in eukaryotic cells. Front Genet 7:100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kissoudis C, van de Wiel C, Visser RGF, van der Linden G (2014) Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. Front Plant Sci 5:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Osório J (2016) Gene regulation: Landscape and mechanisms of transcription factor cooperativity. Nat Rev Genet 17:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2015.11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Duval I, Lachance D, Giguère I et al (2014) Large-scale screening of transcription factor-promoter interactions in spruce reveals a transcription. J Exp Bot 65:2319–2333. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dill A, Jung HS, Sun TP (2001) The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14162–14167. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251534098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee S, Cheng H, King KE et al (2002) Gibberellin regulates Arabidopsis seed germination via RGL2, a GAI/RGA-like gene whose expression is up-regulated following imbibition. Genes Dev 16:646–658. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.969002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Laurenzio L, Wysocka-Diller J, Malamy JE et al (1996) The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root. Cell 86:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80115-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li S, Zhao Y, Zhao Z et al (2016) Crystal structure of the GRAS domain of SCARECROW-LIKE7 in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell 28:1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116:281–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murchison EP, Hannon GJ (2004) miRNAs on the move: miRNA biogenesis and the RNAi machinery. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16:223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2004.04.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N (2008) Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet 9:102–114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singroha G, Sharma P, Sunkur R (2021) Current status of microRNA-mediated regulation of drought stress responses in cereals. Physiol Plant 172:1808–1821. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sunkar R (2010) MicroRNAs with macro-effects on plant stress responses. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21:805–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.04.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu H, Jin T, Liao R et al (2012) MiRFANs: an integrated database for Arabidopsis thaliana microRNA function annotations. BMC Plant Biol 12:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim JY, Kwak KJ, Jung HJ et al (2010) MicroRNA402 affects seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana under stress conditions via targeting DEMETER-LIKE Protein3 mRNA. Plant Cell Physiol 51:1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang HM, Kuang S, Xiong X et al (2013) Transcription factor and microRNA co-regulatory loops: important regulatory motifs in biological processes and diseases. Brief Bioinform 16:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbt085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang H, Wang H, Shao H, Tang X (2016) Recent advances in utilizing transcription factors to improve plant abiotic stress tolerance by transgenic technology. Front Plant Sci 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang JW, Long Y, Xue M, De et al (2017) Identification of microRNAs in response to drought in common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) Shoots and roots. PLoS ONE 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kozomara A, Birgaoanu M, Griffiths-Jones S (2019) MiRBase: from microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D155–D162. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I et al (2012) Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform 13:134. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sepúlveda-García EB, Pulido-Barajas JF, Huerta-Heredia AA et al (2020) Differential expression of maize and teosinte micrornas under submergence, drought, and alternated stress. Plants 9:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta OP, Meena NL, Sharma I, Sharma P (2014) Differential regulation of microRNAs in response to osmotic, salt and cold stresses in wheat. Mol Biol Rep 41:4623–4629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3333-0

  28. Barrera-Figueroa BE, Gao L, Diop NN et al (2011) Identification and comparative analysis of drought-associated microRNAs in two cowpea genotypes. BMC Plant Biol 11:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pandey B, Gupta OP, Pandey DM et al (2013) Identification of new stress-induced microRNA and their targets in wheat using computational approach. Plant Signal Behav 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.23932

  30. Kulcheski FR, Molina LG, da Fonseca GC et al (2016) Novel and conserved microRNAs in soybean floral whorls. Gene 575:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.08.061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gahlaut V, Jaiswal V, Kumar A, Gupta PK (2016) Transcription factors involved in drought tolerance and their possible role in developing drought tolerant cultivars with emphasis on wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Theor Appl Genet 129:2019–2042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2794-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Reyes JL, Chua NH (2007) ABA induction of miR159 controls transcript levels of two MYB factors during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J 49:592–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02980.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang M, Wang Q, Zhang B (2013) Response of miRNAs and their targets to salt and drought stresses in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Gene 530:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.08.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li J, Guo G, Guo W et al (2012) miRNA164-directed cleavage of ZmNAC1 confers lateral root development in maize (Zea mays L). BMC Plant Biol 12:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen L, Wang T, Zhao M et al (2012) Identification of aluminum-responsive microRNAs in Medicago truncatula by genome-wide high-throughput sequencing. Planta 235:375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1514-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Djami-Tchatchou AT, Sanan-Mishra N, Ntushelo K, Dubery IA (2017) Functional roles of microRNAs in agronomically important plants-potential as targets for crop improvement and protection. Front Plant Sci 8:100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Waheed S, Zeng L (2020) The critical role of miRNAs in regulation of flowering time and flower development. Genes (Basel) 11:1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen D, Yan W, Fu LY, Kaufmann K (2018) Architecture of gene regulatory networks controlling flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Commun 9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06772-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou L, Liu Y, Liu Z et al (2010) Genome-wide identification and analysis of drought-responsive microRNAs in Oryza sativa. J Exp Bot 61:4157–4168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nadarajah K, Kumar IS (2019) Drought response in rice: the miRNA story. Int J Mol Sci 20:100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mutum RD, Balyan SC, Kansal S et al (2013) Evolution of variety-specific regulatory schema for expression of osa-miR408 in indica rice varieties under drought stress. FEBS J 280:1717–1730. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gao Y, Feng B, Gao C et al (2022) The evolution and functional roles of miR408 andits targets in plants. Int J Mol Sci 23:6–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kouhi F, Sorkheh K, Ercisli S (2020) MicroRNA expression patterns unveil differential expression of conserved miRNAs and target genes against abiotic stress in safflower. PLoS ONE 15:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Feng XM, Qiao Y, Mao K et al (2010) Overexpression of Arabidopsis AtmiR408 gene in tobacco. Acta Biol Cracoviensia Ser Bot 52:26–31. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10182-010-0020-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang F, Yang J, Zhang N et al (2022) Roles of microRNAs in abiotic stress response and characteristics regulation of plant. Front Plant Sci 13:100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.919243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Engstrom EM, Andersen CM, Gumulak-Smith J et al (2011) Arabidopsis homologs of the petunia HAIRY MERISTEM gene are required for maintenance of shoot and root indeterminacy. Plant Physiol 155:735–750. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.168757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank ICAR-IIWBR for providing the facility for the conductance of this experiment. This paper is IIWBR contribution number 82/479.

Funding

This study was supported by Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (JPG 47.2 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 26.8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, S., Chaudhary, R. & Sharma, P. Temporal expression analysis of microRNAs and their target GRAS genes induced by osmotic stress in two contrasting wheat genotypes. Mol Biol Rep 50, 5621–5633 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-023-08486-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-023-08486-2

Keywords

Navigation