Abstract
Risk taking increases during the final round of a set of repeated risky decisions, a phenomenon known as the ending effect. Recent evidence suggests that the motivation to pursue an emotionally rewarding ending may account for this ending effect. This study tested this explanation using different task paradigms. Experiment 1 ruled out a financial motivational explanation for the ending effect. Specifically, when risk taking was only associated with emotional incentives without financial rewards, the ending effect remained significant. Experiment 2a demonstrated that the ending effect was robust after controlling for the relevant variables. Experiment 2b measured participants’ motivation using a visual reaction time task. The results revealed that perceiving an ending led participants to be more concerned with emotional satisfaction than financial rewards. These findings consistently support the notion that the perception of an approaching ending leads to an increase in emotional rather than financial motivation, and this increased emotional motivation could lead to increased risk-taking toward an ending. This study also ruled out the alternative explanation that the ending effect is driven by the need for financial rewards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw data and analysis code of the two experiments have been uploaded on https://osf.io/sxm56/?view_only=1a3ce563c7364666a6395a746187414f
References
Abe, N., Nakai, R., Yanagisawa, K., Murai, T., & Yoshikawa, S. (2020). Effects of sequential winning vs. losing on subsequent gambling behavior: Analysis of empirical data from casino baccarat players. International Gambling Studies, 21(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2020.1817969
Ali, M. M. (1977). Probability and utility estimates for racetrack bettors. The Journal of Political Economy, 85(4), 803–815. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1828704.
Asch, P., Malkiel, B. G., & Quandt, R. E. (1982). Racetrack betting and informed behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 10(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(82)90012-5
Auerbach, R. P., McWhinnie, C. M., Goldfinger, M., Abela, J. R. Z., Zhu, X., & Yao, S. (2009). The cost of materialism in a collectivistic culture: Predicting risky behavior engagement in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410903401179
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118511
Bennett, M., & Galpert, L. (1992). Developmental changes in understanding the influence of emotion upon cognitive performance and motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995514
Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24(4), 561–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903132496
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276
Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782), 1913–1915. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127488
Carstensen, L. L. (2021). Socioemotional selectivity theory: The role of perceived endings in human motivation. The Gerontologist, 61(8), 1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab116
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024569803230
Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aïte, A., Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12, 926–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026788
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
Cummins, L. F., Nadorff, M. R., & Kelly, A. E. (2009). Winning and positive affect can lead to reckless gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(2), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014783
Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9056-y
Effron, D. A., Bryan, C. J., & Murnighan, J. K. (2015). Cheating at the end to avoid regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000026
Efrat, K., & Shoham, A. (2013). The theory of planned behavior, materialism, and aggressive driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.023
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Figner, B., & Weber, E. U. (2011). Who Takes Risks When and Why?: Determinants of Risk Taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415790
Harlé, K. M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2007). Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game. Emotion, 7(4), 876–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.876
He, W., & Long, L. R. (2011). The effects of pay system frame and performance appraisal on individual’s acceptance of pay for performance plan. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(10), 1198–1210. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2011.01198
He, P., Veronesi, M., & Engel, S. (2017). Consistency of risk preference measures: An artefactual field experiment from rural China. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(11), 1955–1973. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1336542
Heilman, R., Crisan, L., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. (2010). Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10, 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018489
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700
Huber, M., Van Boven, L., McGraw, A. P., & Johnson-Graham, L. (2011). Whom to help? Immediacy bias in judgments of decisions about humanitarian aid. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/146167218788829
Jiang, J., Yang, Q. Y., Yu, F., Liang, J., & Ke, Y. N. (2015). Mediating of parent-child attachment between family stressors and high school students’ materialism. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 525–528. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.03.031
Kopelman, R. E., & Minkin, B. L. (1991). Toward a psychology of parimutuel behavior: Test of gluck’s laws. Psychological Reports, 68(2), 701–702. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.2.701
Kostek, J., & Ashrafioun, L. (2014). Tired winners: The effects of cognitive resources and prior winning on risky decision making. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9365-x
Kuhnen, C. M., & Tymula, A. (2012). Feedback, self-esteem and performance in organizations. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 58(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1379
Lang, P. J. (2010). Emotion and motivation: Toward consensus definitions and a common research purpose. Emotion Review, 2(3), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910361984
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.377
Larrick, R. P. (1993). Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.440
Li, Y., & Epley, N. (2009). When the best appears to be saved for last: Serial position effects on choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(4), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.638
Li, J., & Guo, Y. Y. (2008). Materialism and the relevant studies. Advances in Psychological Science, 16(4), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2008-2103
Magnano, P., Paolillo, A., & Giacominelli, B. (2015). Dispositional Optimism as a Correlate of Decision-Making Styles in Adolescence. SAGE Open, 5(2), 2158244015592002. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015592002
Mckenzie, C. R. M., Sher, S., Müller-Trede, J., Lin, C., Liersch, M. J., & Rawstron, A. G. (2016). Are longshots only for losers? A new look at the last race effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1873
Meng, Y. Q., Xing, C., & Liu, X. H. (2019). The ending effect of negative-expected value gambles: Emotional motivation induces risk taking. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(05), 789–795. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00789
Milhabet, I., Le Barbenchon, E., Cambon, L., & Molina, G. (2015). Comparative Pessimism or Optimism: Depressed Mood, Risk-Taking, Social Utility and Desirability. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, E10. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.9
Newman, J. P., Wallace, J. F., Strauman, T. J., Skolaski, R. L., Oreland, K. M., Mattek, P. W., Elder, K. A., & McNeely, J. (1993). Effects of motivationally significant stimuli on the regulation of dominant responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.165
Newman, J. P., Curtin, J. J., Bertsch, J. D., & Baskin-Sommers, A. R. (2010). Attention moderates the fearlessness of psychopathic offenders. Biological Psychiatry, 67, 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.035
Normann, H. T., & Wallace, B. (2012). The impact of the termination rule on cooperation in a prisoner’s dilemma experiment. International Journal of Games Theory, 41, 707–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-012-0341-y
O’Brien, E., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2012). Saving the last for best. Psychological Science, 23(2), 163–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427408
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17(11), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424
Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1086/383436
Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/209304
Saunders, D. G. (1991). Procedures for adjusting self-reports of violence for social desirability bias. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(3), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626091006003006
Scholer, A. A., Zou, X., Fujita, K., Stroessner, S. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019715
Smith, G., Levere, M., & Kurtzman, R. (2009). Poker player behavior after big wins and big losses. Management Science, 55(9), 1547–1555. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1044
Strough, J., Bruine de Bruin, W., & Parker, A. M. (2019). Taking the biggest first: Age differences in preferences for monetary and hedonic sequences. The Journals of Gerontology: Series b: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74(6), 964–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx160
Tao, R., Zhang, C., Zhao, H., Xu, Y., Han, T., Dai, M., Zheng, K., Zhang, N., & Xu, S. (2023). A negative emotional context disrupts the framing effect on outcome evaluation in decision making under uncertainty: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 60(4), e14207. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14207
Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
Thaler, R. H., & Ziemba, W. T. (1988). Anomalies: Parimutuel betting markets: Racetracks and lotteries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.2.2.161
Wang, Q., Zhang, J. Y., & Xing, C. (2021). Longshot or favorite: The ending effect in investment decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 708211. https://doi.org/10.16719/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708211
Wang, P., Gu, R., Zhang, J., Sun, X., & Zhang, L. (2021). Males with low risk-taking propensity overestimate risk under acute psychological stress. Stress (amsterdam, Netherlands), 24(6), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2021.1957824
Wang, Q., Yin, F., & Xing, C. (2021). The bounded ending effect in the domain of football gambling: High risks are not always preferred at the end. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10085-4
Williams, L. A., & Desteno, D. (2008). Pride and perseverance: The motivational role of pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1007
Xing, C., Meng, Y., Isaacowitz, D. M., Song, Y., & Cai, J. (2019). Motivated to gain: Awareness of an impending ending and the ending effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, e2717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02717
Xing, C., Meng, Y., Isaacowitz, D. M., Wen, Y., & Lin, Z. (2019). The ending effect in investment decisions: The motivational need for an emotionally rewarding ending. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(4), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218788829
Zerbe, W. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (1987). Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/258533
Funding
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 71873133 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Research Funds of Renmin University of China No. 23XNA013 awarded to Cai Xing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, Z., Zhu, A., Wang, Y. et al. Pursuit of emotional satisfaction leads to increased risk taking in final decisions. Motiv Emot (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10073-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10073-2