Abstract
In response to intergroup threats, group members typically exhibit aggressive behaviors. These aggressive behaviors include malevolent creativity (MC), which refers to the application of novel ideas to intentionally harm others. However, whether and how intergroup threats affect MC remains unclear. This study comprehensively examines the impact of intergroup threats on MC, along with its underlying mechanisms, across three experiments. Study 1 investigated the effects of intergroup threats on MC performance. The results revealed that while intergroup threat improved MC originality, it had no significant impact on general creativity, which indicates that intergroup threat enables individuals to invest more resources in generating original malevolent ideas. Building on these findings, Study 2 focused on how the target directivity of MC influences the relationship between intergroup threat and MC performance. The results demonstrated that MC originality was higher when the MC target was directed at threatening outgroup members rather than at irrelevant persons. These findings imply that threatened individuals tend to retaliate vicariously against out-group members using original malevolent methods. Study 3 explored whether realistic and symbolic threats exerted distinct effects on MC performance. Their results showed that only symbolic threats promoted originality and fluency in MC. This indicates that only symbolic threats compelled the incentives to promote the generation of malevolent ideas. In conclusion, these findings suggested that intergroup threats significantly amplify MC, particularly when directed at perceived threatening outgroup members, while symbolic threats appear more conducive to fostering the generation of malevolent ideas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data of current study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Agnoli, S., Corazza, G. E., & Runco, M. A. (2016). Estimating Creativity with a multiple-measurement Approach within scientific and artistic domains. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162475.
Baas, M., Roskes, M., Koch, S., Cheng, Y., & De Dreu, C. (2019). Why social threat motivates malevolent creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1590–1602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219838551.
Batey, M., Hughes, D. J., Mosley, A., Owens, C. E., & Furnham, A. (2022). Psychopathy and openness-to-experience as predictors of malevolent and benevolent creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 196, 111715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111715.
Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Thompson, M. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2011). Under threat of social exclusion, females exclude more than males. Psychological Science, 22(4), 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611402511.
Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Hultgren, B., Nguyen, T., Bullock, G., & Wrangham, R. (2013). Social exclusion: More important to human females than males. PloS One, 8(2), e55851. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055851.
Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2303_5.
Bracha, H. S. (2004). Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint: Adaptationist perspectives on the acute stress response spectrum. CNS Spectrums, 9, 679–685. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900001954.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-Assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452.
Chajut, E., & Algom, D. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.231.
Chang, L. W., Krosch, A. R., & Cikara, M. (2016). Effects of intergroup threat on mind, brain, and behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.004
Chen, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Intergroup threat gates social attention in humans. Biology Letters, 11, 20141055. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.1055.
Chen, Y., Zhao, Y., Song, H., Guan, L., & Wu, X. (2017). The neural basis of intergroup threat effect on social attention. Scientific Reports, 7, 41062. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41062.
Chen, Y., Quan, S., Chen, B., & Zhao, Y. (2019). How does intergroup threat affect the shifting function? The moderating role of group identification. Social Behavior and Personality, 47, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8130.
Cheng, Y., Baas, M., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2018). Creative responses to imminent threats: The role of threat direction and perceived effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.013.
Cheng, R., Lu, K., & Hao, N. (2021a). The effect of anger on malevolent creativity and strategies for its emotion regulation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53, 847–860. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00847.
Cheng, R., Lu, K., & Hao, N. (2021b). The effects of anger on different forms of malevolent creative performance. Journal of Psychological Science, 44, 1336–1345. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00847.
Chow, S. C., Shao, J., Wang, H., & Lokhnygina, Y. (2017). Sample size calculations in clinical research (3th ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315183084.
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Bounded empathy: Neural responses to outgroup targets’ (mis)fortunes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3791–3803. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00069.
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Stereotypes and schadenfreude: Affective and physiological markers of pleasure at outgroup misfortunes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611409245.
Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. R. (2011). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 20, 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408713.
Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2011). Social dominance-based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.769.
Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802059424.
Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (2010). The dark side of creativity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511761225.
Dai, C. L., Yang, Z. L., & Wu, M. Z. (2005). An Experimental Research on Implicit Aggression. Psychological Science, 28, 96–98. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2005.01.024.
Danbold, F., & Huo, Y. J. (2022). Welcome to be like us: Expectations of Outgroup Assimilation Shape Dominant Group Resistance to Diversity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48, 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211004806.
De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: Threat rigidity versus motivated focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.648.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. Yale University Press.
Dixon, A. K. (1998). Ethological strategies for defence in animals and humans: Their role in some psychiatric disorders. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71, 417–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1998.tb01001.x.
Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557.
Gao, Z., Cheng, L., Li, J., Chen, Q., & Hao, N. (2022a). The dark side of creativity: Neural correlates of malevolent creative idea generation. Neuropsychologia, 167, 108164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108164.
Gao, Z., Qiao, X., Xu, X., & Hao, N. (2022b). Darkness within: The internal mechanism between dark triad and malevolent creativity. Journal of Intelligence, 10, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040119.
Garber, P. M. (1990). Famous first bubbles. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.2.35.
García-Rodríguez, M., Fernández-Company, J. F., Alvarado, J. M., Jiménez, V., & Ivanova-Iotova, A. (2021). Pleasure in music and its relationship with social anhedonia. Studies in Psychology, 42, 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2020.1857632.
Glaser, J., Dixit, J., & Green, D. P. (2002). Studying hate crime with the internet: What makes racists advocate racial violence? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00255.
Guerra, R., Bierwiaczonek, K., Ferreira, M., Golec de Zavala, A., Abakoumkin, G., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2022). An intergroup approach to collective narcissism: Intergroup threats and hostility in four European union countries. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220972178.
Halperin, E. (2008). Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 713–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708314665.
Hao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. (2016). A new tool to measure malevolent creativity: The malevolent creativity behavior scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 00682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682.
Hao, N., Qiao, X., Cheng, R., Lu, K., Tang, M., & Runco, M. A. (2020). Approach motivational orientation enhances malevolent creativity. Acta Psychologica, 203, 102985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102985.
Harris, D. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and furious: The influence of implicit aggression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 9, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0038499.
Harris, D. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The effect of emotional intelligence and task type on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 7, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032139.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Heinsberg, L. W., & Weeks, D. E. (2022). Post hoc power is not informative. Genetic Epidemiology, 46, 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.22464.
Jackson, L. M., & Esses, V. M. (2000). Effects of perceived economic competition on people’s willingness to help empower immigrants. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003004006.
Johnson, K. J., Zaback, M., Tokuno, C. D., Carpenter, M. G., & Adkin, A. L. (2019). Exploring the relationship between threat-related changes in anxiety, attention focus, and postural control. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83, 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0940-0.
Jonason, P. K., Abboud, R., Tomé, J., Dummett, M., & Hazer, A. (2017). The Dark Triad traits and individual differences in self-reported and other-rated creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.005.
Kamans, E., Otten, S., & Gordijn, E. H. (2011). Power and threat in intergroup conflict: How emotional and behavioral responses depend on amount and content of threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210372525.
Kapoor, H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2022). The evil within: The AMORAL model of dark creativity. Theory & Psychology, 32, 467–490. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rbnx2.
Lee, S. A., & Dow, G. T. (2011). Malevolent creativity: Does personality influence malicious divergent thinking? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.571179.
Li, T., & Zhao, Y. (2012). Help less or help more —perceived intergroup threat and out-group helping. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v4n4p90.
Lipp, O. V., & Waters, A. M. (2007). When danger lurks in the background: Attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. Emotion, 7, 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.192.
Mael, F. A., & Tetrick, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 52, 813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004002.
Martínez, C. A., van Prooijen, J. W., & Van Lange, P. A. (2022). A threat-based hate model: How symbolic and realistic threat underlie hate and aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 103, 104393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104393.
McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R., & Tabak, B. A. (2013). Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11002160.
Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (2011). An emotion perspective on emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 782–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.586824.
Morrison, K. R., & Ybarra, O. (2009). Symbolic threat and social dominance among liberals and conservatives: SDO reflects conformity to political values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1039–1052. https://doi.org/1.1002/ejsp.769.
Mullen, B., Migdal, M. J., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Crossed categorization versus simple categorization and intergroup evaluations: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(6), 721–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.60.
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323.
Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., & Papousek, I. (2020). Creative, antagonistic, and angry? Exploring the roots of malevolent creativity with a real‐World idea generation task. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55, 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.484.
Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., & Papousek, I. (2022). Social exclusion increases antisocial tendencies: Evidence from retaliatory ideation in a malevolent creativity task. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000500. Advance online publication.
Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Rominger, C., Papousek, I., & Fink, A. (2023). Women and men have a similar potential for malevolent creativity–but their underlying brain mechanisms are different. Brain Research, 1801, 148201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148201.
Pham, M. T. (2007). Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of General Psychology, 11, 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.155.
Qiao, X., Lu, K., Teng, J., Gao, Z., & Hao, N. (2022). Middle occipital area differentially associates with malevolent versus benevolent creativity: An fNIRS investigation. Social Neuroscience, 17, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2022.2038261.
Qiao, X., Lu, K., Yun, Q., & Hao, N. (2023). Similarities and distinctions between cortical neural substrates that underlie generation of malevolent creative ideas. eNeuro, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0127-23.2023.
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4.
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., Gaertner, S. L., McDonald, S. A., & Lamoreaux, M. J. (2010). Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209346701.
Rios, K., Sosa, N., & Osborn, H. (2018). An experimental approach to intergroup threat theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 212–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537049.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929.
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–340. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1334_16.
Runco, M., Abdulla, A., Paek, S., Al-Jasim, F., & Alsuwaidi, H. (2016). Which test of Divergent thinking is best? Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 3, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0001.
Schmid, K., & Muldoon, O. T. (2015). Perceived threat, social identification, and psychological well-being: The effects of political conflict exposure. Political Psychology, 36, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12073.
Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Küpper, B., Zick, A., & Tausch, N. (2014). Reducing aggressive intergroup action tendencies: Effects of intergroup contact via perceived intergroup threat. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21516.
Sjöström, A., & Gollwitzer, M. (2015). Displaced revenge. Can revenge taste sweet if it aims at a different target? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.016.
Sohn, J. H., Kim, H. E., Sohn, S., Seok, J. W., Choi, D., & Watanuki, S. (2015). Effect of emotional arousal on inter-temporal decision-making: An fMRI study. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 34, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-015-0047-5.
Stenstrom, D. M., Lickel, B., Denson, T. F., & Miller, N. (2008). The roles of ingroup identification and outgroup entitativity in intergroup retribution. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1570–1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208322999.
Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R., & Duran, A. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031002006.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2017). Intergroup threat theory. In Y. Y. Kim & K. L. McKay-Semmler (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication (pp. 1–12). Wiley Blackwell.
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Morrison, K. R. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 43–59). Erlbaum.
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Rios, K. (2015). Intergroup threat theory. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 255–278). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). A duplex theory of hate: Development and application to terrorism, massacres, and genocide. Review of General Psychology, 7, 299–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.299.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worschel WG, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
Van Leeuwen, W., & Baas, M. (2017). Creativity under attack: How people’s role in competitive conflict shapes their creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1376492.
Walton, A. P., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2012). Creativity in its social context: The interplay of organizational norms, situational threat, and gender. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677345.
Wang, L. (2019). Creativity as a pragmatic moral tool. Journal of Business Research, 96, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.009.
Wiltermuth, S. S., Vincent, L. C., & Gino, F. (2017). Creativity in unethical behavior attenuates condemnation and breeds social contagion when transgressions seem to create little harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.006.
Wirtz, C., van der Pligt, J., & Doosje, B. (2016). Negative attitudes toward muslims in the Netherlands: The role of symbolic threat, stereotypes, and moral emotions. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22, 75. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000126.
Yang, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2013). The effect of perspective taking on negative cognitive responses induced by intergroup threat. Social Behavior and Personality, 41, 901–905. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.6.901.
Zhao, J., Xu, X., & Pang, W. (2022). When do creative people engage in malevolent behaviors? The moderating role of moral reasoning. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, 111386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111386.
Zhu, C. M., Gong, H. L., & Zheng, X. F. (2006). An experimental research on character of implicit aggression among juveniles. Psychological Exploration, 26, 48–50. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2006.02.011.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the STI 2030-Major Projects 2021ZD0200500.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
There is no conflict of interest in the present study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, L., Qiao, X. & Hao, N. Intergroup threat stimulates malevolent creative idea generation. Motiv Emot (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10070-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10070-5