Skip to main content
Log in

Correlational and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) of commonly used empathy questionnaires: New insights

Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empathy is a concept whose history has been marred by conceptual inconsistencies. Dispositional measures of empathy have varied in constituent subscales and have been suggested to conflate with other related constructs. The current investigation consists of correlational and exploratory factor analyses with self-report empathy measures to assess the commonalities between these measures. Four hundred ninety-seven university undergraduates completed a battery of self-report dispositional empathy measures, along with situational and dispositional sympathy measures. The novel findings include moderate correlations between scales purporting to measure empathy, an interpretable six-factor structure which represent subcomponents of these empathy scales, and the modest ability of existing questionnaires to contribute to these factor structures. The retained factor structure is not consistent with previous definitions of empathy, and it appears that self-report empathy measures do not adequately measure a uniform, consistent construct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Speltri, D., & Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the ‘Basic Empathy Scale’. Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 393–408. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allemand, M., Steiger, A. E., & Fend, H. A. (2014). Empathy development in adolescence predicts social competencies in adulthood. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.12098.

  • Allison, C. C., Baron-Cohen, S. S., Wheelwright, S. J., Stone, M. H., & Muncer, S. J. (2011). Psychometric analysis of the empathy quotient (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 829–835. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, A. I., McDermott, P. A., Cacciola, J. S., & Rutherford, M. J. (2003). Latent structure of the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index in methadone maintenance patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25(4), 257–265. doi:10.1023/A:1025936213110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), Social neuroscience. The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. (2011). Altruism in humans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290–302. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., et al. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy–altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52–77. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonino, S., Lo Coco, A., & Tani, F. (1998). Empatia. Processi di condivisione delle emozioni. Giunti: Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, P., Oceja, L., Caballero, A., Muñoz, D., López-Pérez, B., & Ambrona, T. (2013). I feel so sorry! Tapping the joint influence of empathy and personal distress on helping behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 37(2), 335–345. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9302-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chlopan, B. E., McCain, M. L., Carbonell, J. L., & Hagen, R. L. (1985). Empathy: Review of available measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 635–653. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 406–412. doi:10.1177/1534582304267187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2007). The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: Implications for intervention across different clinical populations. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 1(22), 1–22. doi:10.1186/1751-0759-1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., Andréasson, P., & Thunberg, M. (2011). Emotional empathy and facial reactions to facial expressions. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25(1), 26–31. doi:10.1027/0269-8803/a000029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., & Thunberg, M. (2012). Empathy, emotional contagion, and rapid facial reactions to angry and happy facial expressions. PsyCh Journal, 1(2), 118–127. doi:10.1002/pchj.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 71–83). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., & Zhou, Q. (2002). Prosocial development in early adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 993–1006. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, N. D., Caprara, G. V., Lo Coco, A., Pastorelli, C., Manna, G., & Menzres, J. (1991). Empathy and its correlates: Cross cultural data from Italy. Eleventh biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Minneapolis.

  • Froman, R. D., & Peloquin, S. M. (2001). Rethinking the use of the Hogan Empathy Scale: A critical psychometric analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(5), 566–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, K. E., Segal, E. A., & Lietz, C. A. (2010). Conceptualising and measuring empathy. British Journal of Social Work, 40(7), 2326–2343. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilet, A., Mella, N., Studer, J., Grühn, D., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013). Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: A French validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 45(1), 42–48. doi:10.1037/a0030425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawk, S. T., Keijsers, L., Branje, S. J. T., Van der Graaff, J., de Wied, M., & Meeus, W. (2013). Examining the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) among early and late adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(1), 96–106. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.696080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism part of human nature? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 121–137. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307–316. doi:10.1037/h0027580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. J., Turowski, J. B., & Buro, K. (2012). Guilt, empathy, and apology. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 917–922. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G. (2005). Theodor Lipps and the shift from ‘sympathy’ to ‘empathy’. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(2), 151–163. doi:10.1002/jhbs.20080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., Bethell, E. J., & Ross, R. (2013). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the Dark Triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 572–576. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, G. M., Snowden, A., & Martin, C. R. (2013). Empathy in mental health nursing: Learned, acquired, or lost? British Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2(1), 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S., & Holosko, M. J. (2012). The development and initial validation of the empathy scale for social workers. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(2), 174–185. doi:10.1177/1049731511417136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrath, S. H., O’Brien, E. H., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180–198. doi:10.1177/1088868310377395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krill, A. L., Platek, S. M., & Wathne, K. (2008). Feelings of control during social exclusion are partly accounted for by empathizing personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 684–688. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the empathy quotient. Psychological Medicine: A Journal of Research in Psychiatry and the Allied Sciences, 34(5), 911–919. doi:10.1017/S0033291703001624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. A. (2009). Measuring individual differences in trait sympathy: Instrument construction and validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(6), 568–583. doi:10.1080/00223890903228620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepage, J. F., Lortie, M., Taschereau-Dumouchel, V., & Théoret, H. (2009). Validation of French–Canadian versions of the empathy quotient and autism spectrum quotient. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 41(4), 272–276. doi:10.1037/a0016248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lietz, C. A., Gerdes, K. E., Sun, F., Geiger, J., Wagaman, M., & Segal, E. A. (2011). The Empathy Assessment Index (EAI): A confirmatory factor analysis of a multidimensional model of empathy. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 2(2). doi:10.5243/jsswr.2011.6.

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muncer, S. J., & Ling, J. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1111–1119. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Using Mplus Monte Carlo simulations in practice: A note on non-normal missing data in latent variable models. Mplus web notes: no. 2. http://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/mc2.pdf.

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2009). Mplus short course topic 1. IntroductoryAdvanced factor analysis and structural equation modeling with continuous outcomes. http://www.statmodel.com/course_materials.shtml.

  • Nordgren, L. F., Banas, K., & MacDonald, G. (2011). Empathy gaps for social pain: Why people underestimate the pain of social suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 120–128. doi:10.1037/a0020938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. L., & Streiner, D. L. (1994). Biostatistics: The bare essentials. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32(3), 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelligra, V. (2011). Empathy, guilt-aversion, and patterns of reciprocity. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4(3), 161–173. doi:10.1037/a0024688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reik, T. (1948). Listening with the third ear. The inner experience of a psychoanalyst. Oxford, UK: Farrar, Straus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119–125. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119:AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Canyas, R., & Downey, G. (2013). What I see when I think it’s about me: People low in rejection-sensitivity downplay cues of rejection in self-relevant interpersonal situations. Emotion, 13(1), 104–117. doi:10.1037/a0029786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, A. C. (2012). The influence of empathizing and systemizing on humor processing: Theory of mind and humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 25(1), 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2009). Empathic processing: Its cognitive and affective dimensions and neuroanatomical basis. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), Social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 215–232). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2014). Dynamic functional integration of distinct neural empathy systems. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 1–2. doi:10.1093/scan/nst107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2007). Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3054–3067. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 132(3), 617–627. doi:10.1093/brain/awn279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. G., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010). Individual differences in empathizing and systemizing predict variation in face preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 655–658. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62–71. doi:10.1080/00223890802484381.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, P., Zalewski, I., von Reventlow, H., Norra, C., Juckel, G., & Daum, I. (2011). Cognitive and affective empathy in depression linked to executive control. Psychiatry Research, 189(3), 373–378. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(6), 673–685. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.6.673-686.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wispe, L. (1987). History of the concept of empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 17–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls, and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(2), 675–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conrad Baldner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baldner, C., McGinley, J.J. Correlational and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) of commonly used empathy questionnaires: New insights. Motiv Emot 38, 727–744 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9417-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9417-2

Keywords

Navigation