Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A multi-stakeholder participatory methodology to facilitate socio-ecological climate change vulnerability–adaptation–resilience strategies: application of the Q Method

  • Original article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peri-urban spaces are critical components of urban systems and highly vulnerable to climate change (CC). Viable adaptation strategies for these spaces should consider the interconnectedness between cities and their peri-urbanities, and their vulnerability–adaptation–resilience dynamics, which emphasizes understanding their state of accumulative vulnerability, beyond the environmental realm. Further, the successful implementation of adaptation measures requires multi-stakeholder participation. Thus, peri-urbanities need to actively incorporate their perceptions during the development of such interventions. This work aims at establishing the preferences at both the individual and community level in a peri-urban area during the identification of its vulnerability–adaptation–resilience dynamics. This approach was applied to a peri-urbanity in Northwestern Mexico under a multi-decade drought. The Q Method was utilized to understand the community’s priorities regarding CC adaptations. The findings were discussed between academics, local government officials, and the community and then used to outline a strategy that would empower locals to implement a priority-based plan. It is suggested that this plan include green infrastructure, household water and energy savings, comprehensive waste management, and local food production. These findings could be used as reference to create local adaptation–resilience efforts in other drought-prone peri-urban spaces with similar vulnerability–adaptation–resilience dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albizua A, Zografos Ch (2014) A values-based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Applying Q Methodology in the Ebro Delta, Spain. Environ Policy Gov 24(6):405–422

  • Addams H, Proops J (2000) Social discourse and environmental policy: an application of Q methodology. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfie M, Salomón G, Gustavo MC, Laura Q (2017) Análisis de la vulnerabilidad y resiliencia al cambio climático en sistemas socio-ecológicos periurbanos. Project Report. SEMARNAT-2015-01-263102. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT) /Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), México

  • Allen A (2003) Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environ Urban 15:135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780301500103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armatas C, Venn T, Watson A (2016) Understanding social–ecological vulnerability with Q-methodology: a case study of water-based ecosystem services in Wyoming USA. Sustain Sci 12:105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0369-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhsh K, Rauf S, Zulfiqar F (2018) Adaptation strategies for minimizing heat wave induced morbidity and its determinants. Sustain Cities Soc 41:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett TJ, Fogelman C (2013) Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 48:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs R, Schlüter M, Schoon M (2015) An introduction to the resilience approach and principles to sustain ecosystem services in social–ecological systems. In: Biggs R, Schlüter M, Schoon M (eds) Principles for building resilience: sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bumbudsanpharoke W, Moran D, Hall C (2009) Exploring perspectives of environmental best management practices in Thai agriculture: an application of Q-methodology. Environ Conserv 36:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892909990397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón-Contreras R, Quiroz-Rosas LE (2017) Analysing scale, quality and diversity of green infrastructure and the provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: a case from Mexico City. Ecosyst Serv 23:127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron ES (2012) Securing indigenous politics: a critique of the vulnerability and adaptation approach to the human dimensions of climate change in the Canadian arctic. Glob Environ Chang 22:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching L, Mukherjee M (2015) Managing the socio-ecology of very large rivers: collective choice rules in IWRM narratives. Glob Environ Chang 34:172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CONANP-GIZ (2014) Herramienta para analizar vulnerabilidad social a impactos de Cambio Climático en áreas naturales protegidas de México. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP) - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), México

  • Cook BI, Cook ER, Smerdon JE, Seager R, Williams AP, Coats S, Stahle DW, Díaz JV (2016) North American megadroughts in the Common Era: reconstructions and simulations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 7:411–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgadillo J (1996) Desastres Naturales. Aspectos asociados para su prevención y tratamiento en México. UNAM-CONACYT-SIMAC-UAS, México

  • Díaz-Caravantes RE, Sánchez-Flores E (2011) Water transfer effects on peri-urban land use/land cover: a case study in a semi-arid region of Mexico. Appl Geogr 31:413–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Magaña V, Smith J, Moreno JL, Martínez JM, Landavazo O (2007) A stakeholder driven process to reduce vulnerability to climate change in Hermosillo, Sonora Mexico. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12:935–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9107-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6:439–447. https://doi.org/10.1890/070062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada-Santoyo, Y.C. 2007. Usos del agua vista desde la perspectiva rural: San Pedro el Saucito, Sonora, México. XXV Congreso de la asociación Latinoamericana de Sociología, Guadalajara, México. http;//cdsa.aacademica.org/000-066/1101.pdf

  • Galindo C, Delgado J (2006) Los espacios emergentes de la dinámica rural-urbana. Probl del Desarro Rev Latinoam Econ 37:187–216 https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2006.147.7639

  • Gaytán, A., Montaño, R., 2009. Producción agropecuaria, diversificación económica y escasez de agua en San Pedro El Saucito. Ruta Crítica. Rev. Univ. Son. 8–11

  • Gebhard C, Smith SJ (2015) The two faces of EU–NATO cooperation: counter-piracy operations off the Somali coast. Coop Confl 50:107–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836714532917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles S, Larralde A (2013) Conceptualización y medición de lo rural. Una propuesta para clasificar el espacio rural en México. In La situación demográfica de México [WWW Document]. Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO). URL http://www.conapo.gob.mx/en/CONAPO/La_Situacion_Demografica_de_Mexico_2013 (accessed 10.13.18)

  • INEGI (2016) Actualización del Marco Censal Agropecuario 2016 [Metadata]. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). URL https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/amca/2016/#Microdatos (accessed 10.14.18)

  • INEGI (2016a) División política municipal (Municipal political division), 1:250,000 [Metadata]. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). URL http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/gis/ (accessed 10.14.18)

  • INEGI (2016b) División política estatal (State political division), 1:250,000 [Metadata]. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. URL http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/gis/ (accessed 10.14.18)

  • IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–32

  • IPCC (2007) Cambio climático 2007: Informe de síntesis. Contribución de los Grupos de trabajo I, II y III al Cuarto Informe de evaluación del Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático [Equipo de redacción principal: Pachauri, R.K. y Reisinger, A. (directores de la publicación)]. IPCC, Ginebra, Suiza, 104 págs

  • Iribarnegaray MA, De La Zerda MFE, Hutton CM, Brannstrom C, Liberal VI, Tejerina W, Seghezzo L (2014) Water-conservation policies in perspective: insights from a Q-method study in Salta, Argentina. Water Policy 16:897–916. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2014.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepp S, Chavez-Rodríguez L (2018) A critical approach to climate change adaptation. Discourses, policies, and practices. Routledge, London-New York

  • Laquinta D, Drescher AW (2000) Defining the peri-urban; Rural-urban linkages and institutional connections. Land Reform Land Settlement Coperatives 8:27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner AM, Eakin HC, Tellman E, Bausch JC, Hernández Aguilar B (2018) Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity: the example of hydrological risk in Mexico City. Cities 83:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB, Egerer MH, Liere H, Jha S, Bichier P, Philpott SM (2018) Local- and landscape-scale land cover affects microclimate and water use in urban gardens. Sci Total Environ 610–611:570–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu MY, Li Y, Lu AP, Han XJ (2013) Feasibility analysis of the value of Q method in the classification and understanding of expert experience. Chin J Integr Med 19:869–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-012-1174-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanes-Cárdenas O, Gaxiola-Hernández A, Estrella-Gastelum RD, Norzagaray-Campos M, Troyo-Diéguez E, Pérez-González E, Ruiz-Guerrero R, Pellegrini Cervantes M de J (2018) Variability and factors of influence of extreme wet and dry events in Northern Mexico. Atmosphere (Basel) 9:122https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040122

  • Metzger MJ, Lindner M, Pedroli B (2018) Towards a roadmap for sustainable land use in Europe. Reg Environ Chang 18:707–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1285-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley S, Dejene A, Mattick A (2012) Adaptation to climate change in semi-arid environments: experiences and lessons from Mozambique. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser C (2011) A conceptual and operational framework for pro-poor asset adaptation to urban climate change in Cities and Climate Change, in: Cities and Climate Change. Responding to an Urgent Agenda. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  • Muñoz-Piña C, De Janvry A, Sadoulet E (2003) Recrafting rights over common property resources in Mexico. Econ Dev Cult Change 52:129–158. https://doi.org/10.1086/380104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer S, Pelts J, Hobson K (2005) Rapid climate change and society: assessing responses and thresholds. Risk Anal 25(6):1443–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’neill SJ, Boykoff M, Niemeyer S, Day SA (2013) On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Glob Environ Change 23(2):413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco-Vega R (2014) Ostrom y la gobernanza del agua en México. Rev Mex Sociol 76:137–166 https://doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2014.0.46485

  • Pérez-Campuzano E, Avila-Foucat VS, Perevochtchikova M (2016) Environmental policies in the peri-urban area of Mexico City: the perceived effects of three environmental programs. Cities 50:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineda-Pablos N, Scott CA, Wilder M, Salazar-Adams A, Díaz-Caravantes R, Brito L, Watts C, Moreno JL, Oroz L, Neri C (2012) Hermosillo, ciudad sin agua para crecer. Vulnerabilidad hídrica y reos frente al cambio climático, in: Wilder M, Scott CA, Pineda-Pablos N, Varady RG, Garfin GM (Eds.), Avanzando Desde La Vulnerabilidad Hacia La Adaptación. University of Arizona, Arizona

  • Pisanty I, Mazari M, Ezcurra E, Moreno-Casasola P, Ojeda-Revah L, Velázquez A, Romero-Malpica R, Bonfil C (2009) El reto de la conservación de la biodiversidad en zonas urbanas y peri-urbanas., in: Dirzo R, Gonzales R, March I (Eds.), Capital Natural de México (Vol. II, Estado de Conservación y Tendencias de Cambio). Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México, pp. 719–759.

  • Randall L (1996) Reforming Mexico’s agrarian reform. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R (1995) Q methodology. In: Smith JA, Harre R, Van Langenhove L (eds) Rethinking methods in psychology. Sage, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmolk P (2014) PQMethod (2.35 with PQROT 2.0) [Software]. GNU Gen. Public Licens. URL http://schmolck.org/qmethod/downpqwin.htm (accessed 10.14.18).

  • Scott CA, Lutz-Ley AN (2016) Enhancing Water Governance for Climate Resilience: Arizona, USA—Sonora, Mexico Comparative Assessment of the Role of Reservoirs in Adaptive Management for Water Security, in: Increasing Resilience to Climate Variability and Change, Water Resources Development and Management. Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore, pp. 15–40 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1914-2_2

  • Sendzimir J, Reij CP, Magnuszewski P (2011) Rebuilding resilience in the Sahel: regreening in the Maradi and Zinder Regions of Niger. Ecol Soc 16:1–29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04198-160301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K, Petley D (2009) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster, Fifth. ed. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York

  • Soto-Montes-de-Oca G, Alfie-Cohen M (2019) Impact of climate change in Mexican peri-urban areas with risk of drought. J Arid Environ 162:74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2018.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2018) 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects [WWW Document] . United Nations (UN). URL https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html (accessed 10.13.18)

  • UNDP (2010) Handbook for conducting Technology Needs Assessment for Climate Change. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zeijst H, Prins A, Dammers E, Vonk M, Bouwma I, Farjon H, Pouwels R (2017) European nature in the plural: finding common ground for a next policy agenda (No.1615). Research report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Neatherlands.

  • VijayavenkataRaman S, Iniyan S, Goic R (2012) A review of climate change, mitigation and adaptation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:878–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webler T, Danielson S, Tuler S (2007) Guidance on the use of Q Method for evaluation of public involvement programs at contaminated sites. Research Report. Social and Environmental Research Institute, Greenfield - Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler S, Zuo A, Bjornlund H (2013) Farmers’ climate change beliefs and adaptation strategies for a water scarce future in Australia. Glob Environ Chang 23:537–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, Brown K, Corway D (2009) Ecological citizenship and climate change: perceptions and practice. Environ Polit 18(4):503–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivojinovic I, Wolfsleher B (2015) Perceptions of Urban forestry stakeholders about climate change adaptation- a Q Method application in Serbia. Urban For Urban Green 14(4):1079–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the participants from the San Pedro el Saucito, CONAFOR, FIDE, WWTUP, PROAES, and especially PROAES’ Rocio B. Rincon, without whom this work could not have been possible.

Funding

This work was funded by the joint SEMARNAT/CONACYT grant (Project No. 263102) and Dr. Garcia-Becerra’s CONACYT Researcher-Professor Fellowship (Project No. 2989, 2014-2021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flor Yunuen Garcia-Becerra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alfie-Cohen, M., Garcia-Becerra, F.Y. A multi-stakeholder participatory methodology to facilitate socio-ecological climate change vulnerability–adaptation–resilience strategies: application of the Q Method. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 27, 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09988-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09988-9

Keywords

Navigation