Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robots, Dennett and the autonomous: a terminological investigation

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present enterprise we take a look at the meaning of Autonomy, how the word has been employed and some of the consequences of its use in the sciences of the artificial. Could and should robots really be autonomous entities? Over and beyond this, we use concepts from the philosophy of mind to spur on enquiry into the very essence of human autonomy. We believe our initiative, as does Dennett's life-long research, sheds light upon the problems of robot design with respect to their relation with humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cruse, H. (1999). Feeling our body—the basis of cognition? Evolution and Cognition, 5(2), 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlbom, B. (1993). Dennett and his critics demystifying mind. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1971). Intentional systems. Journal of Philosophy, 8, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1978). Brainstorms: philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Cambridge MA: Bradford/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge MA: Bradford/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1996). [Kinds of Minds] tr. in French; La diversité des esprits: Une approche de la conscience. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (2001). Bauplan für eine Seele, Reinbek.

  • Dreyfus, H. (1972). What computers still can't do: a critique of artificial reason. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim , É. (1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a Person, Journal of Philosophy, LXVIII January 14.

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. III pp. 41–58), Academic Press.

  • Kant, I. (1959a). Critique of practical reason, transl. Lewis White Beck, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1959b). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. tr. Lewis White Beck, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1979). An essay concerning human understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Putnam , H. (1981a), Brains in a vat, reason, truth and history. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1981b), A problem with reference, reason, truth and history. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewindt , J. B., (1998), The invention of autonomy: a history of modern moral philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. T. A. (2005). Of robots and believing. Minds and Machines, 15(2), 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. T. A. (2002). 'Socially interactive robots. Why our current beliefs about them still work', Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication RO-MAN 2002, Sept. 25–27 2002, Berlin Germany.

  • Schmidt, C. T. A. (2004a). 'Humanoids, from interfaces to intelligence. Really? A philosophical statement on retrograding or scientists caught back-peddling', The 2004 American Association of Artificial Intelligence Fall Symposium Series on 'The intersection of cognitive science and robotics: from interfaces to intelligence', Technical Report No. FSS-04, Menlo Park CA: The AAAI Press.

  • Schmidt, C. T. A. (2004b). 'Robotic wondering', International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE SMC 2004, October 10–13, Delft University of Technology, The Hague, The Netherlands: IEEE Press.

  • Schmidt, C. T. A. (2004c). A relational stance in the philosophy of artificial intelligence, European conference on computing and philosophy 3–5 June, University of Pavia, Italy: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Smith, B. (2006). Ontology and information science (draft), Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu.

  • Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals: an essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1970). Persons, In: Feigl, Scriven, & Grover Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science (Vol. II), University of Minnesota Press.

  • Tournier, M. (1967). Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique, Gallimard.

  • Voltaire, F.-M. A. (1969). Lettres philosophiques, ed. Raymond Naves, Paris: Garnier.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. T. A. Schmidt.

Additional information

Very often in his writings, Daniel Dennett focuses on the creation of life-like computationally driven creatures and the bounds put on such technology by our perception of it. He has been known for referring to the challenge of building a robot having beliefs, intentions and consciousness as a 'sporting event'. We should not confuse a sporting event with a scientific endeavour. Do artificially autonomous robots constitute a scientific endeavour?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, C.T.A., Kraemer, F. Robots, Dennett and the autonomous: a terminological investigation. Mind Mach 16, 73–80 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-006-9014-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-006-9014-6

Keywords

Navigation