Abstract
Psychiatric diagnosis depends, centrally, on the transmission of patients’ knowledge of their experiences and symptoms to clinicians by testimony. In the case of non-native speakers, the need for linguistic interpretation raises significant practical problems. But determining the best practical approach depends on determining the best underlying model of both testimony and knowledge itself. Internalist models of knowledge have been influential since Descartes. But they cannot account for testimony. Since knowledge by testimony is possible, and forms the basis of psychiatric diagnosis, its very existence is a factor in support of an externalist model of knowledge in general. Internalist and externalist models of knowledge also suggest different ways of responding to the practical challenges of basing psychiatric diagnosis on testimony. Thus the argument in favour of externalism also supports a potentially empirically testable hypothesis about interpretation of non-native speakers for accurate psychiatric diagnosis: interpretation of non-English speakers should be as transparent and unhindered by specialised medical knowledge as possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, J. 1984. Research perspectives on ageing: Black and Asian old people in Britain (1st ed.). London: Age Concern Research Unit.
Bhalla, A., and K. Blakemore. 1981. Elders of the minority ethnic groups. Birmingham: All Faiths for One Race.
Coady, A. 1992. Testimony: a philosophical study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Descartes, R. 1986. Meditations on first philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldman, A.I. 1979. What is justified belief? In Justification and knowledge, ed. G. Pappas. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hume, D. 1975. Enquiries concerning the human understanding and concerning the principles of morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jones, D., and P. Gill. 1998. Breaking down language barriers. The NHS needs to provide accessible interpreting services for all. British Medical Journal 316: 1476.
Lindesay, J., C. Jagger, M.J. Hibbert, S.M. Peet, and F. Moledina. 1997a. Knowledge, uptake and availability of health and social services among Asian Gujarati and white elders. Ethnicity & Health 2: 59–69.
Lindesay, J., C. Jagger, A. Mlynik-Szmid, A. Sinorwala, S. Peet, and F. Moledina. 1997b. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) in an elderly immigrant Gujarati population in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 12: 1155–1167.
Lipton, P. 1998. The epistemology of testimony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 1–31.
McDowell, J. 1982. Criteria, defeasibility and knowledge. Proceedings of the British Academy 68: 455–479.
McDowell, J. 1998. Meaning knowledge and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Manthorpe, J., and P. Hettiaratchy. 1993. Ethnic minority elders in Britain. International Review of Psychiatry 5: 173–180.
Phelan, M., and S. Parkman. 1995. Work with an interpreter. British Medical Journal 311: 555–557.
Sellars, W. 1997. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shah, A.K. 1992. Difficulties in interviewing elderly people from an Asian ethnic group. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 7: 917.
Shah, A.K. 1997a. Interviewing mentally ill ethnic minority elders with interpreters. Australian Journal on Ageing 16: 220–221.
Shah, A.K. 1997b. Straight talk. overcoming language barriers in diagnosis. Geriatric Medicine 27: 45–46.
Shah, A.K. 1999. Difficulties experienced by a Gujarati psychiatrist in interviewing elderly Gujaratis in Gujarati. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 14: 1072–1074.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thornton, T., Shah, A. & Thomas, P. Understanding, testimony and interpretation in psychiatric diagnosis. Med Health Care and Philos 12, 49–55 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-008-9130-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-008-9130-6