Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental analysis of passive bio-inspired covert feathers for stall and post-stall performance enhancement

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technologies inspired by the functioning and behavior of biological beings are commonly developed for aircraft flight. Among the bio-inspired approaches that have grown in interest, particularly for unmanned aerial vehicle flight, is based on the behavior of bird’s cover feathers under higher angles of attack. The covert feathers, when activated by separated flows, promote lift increment that helps in certain maneuvers. This work investigates the benefit in the stall and post-stall performance of employing bio-inspired covert feathers devices attached to an airfoil’s upper surface. To fill the gaps in the recent technical literature, experimental analysis of an SD7003 airfoil was executed in a wind tunnel with the application of bio-inspired covert feathers of different shapes and tapes in three chordwise positions. The bio-inspired devices were conceived to resemble the feathers’ lightness and discrete-distribution along with the wing model. Experiments were carried out measuring the aerodynamic forces and moment at Reynolds number around 170,000 for static and dynamic ramp-up and hold pitching motion. It has been confirmed that the use of bio-inspired covert feathers brought benefits to the stall and post-stall behavior of the airfoil. The maximum lift has increased, and the transition from attached to stalled flow around the airfoil tends to be smoother when the devices were used. Four shapes for the bio-inspired devices and three positions in chordwise direction were considered. The best performance among the case was encountered for a jagged bio-inspired device taped at a quarter-chord position. Indeed, the most forward position for all the devices resulted in higher maximum lift and increment to the respective angle of attack. Ramp-up and hold wind tunnel tests also confirmed the best performance of jagged bio-inspired devices nearer the leading edge. The aerodynamic response to the pitching motion showed that the stall and post-stall regime occur much smoother, indicating that the approach presents good potential for dynamic stall or gust response passive control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbasi SH, Mahmood A (2019) Bio-inspired gust mitigation system for a flapping wing UAV: modeling and simulation. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Springer) 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-2044-9

  2. Abbott IH, Von Doenhoff AE, Stivers Jr L, (1945) Summary of airfoil data. Tech. Rep. NACA-TR-824, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics

  3. Allemand G, Altman A, (2016) Post-stall performance improvement through bio-inspired passive covert feathers. In: Proceedings of the 54\({}^{th}\) AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (SciTech 2016). San Diego, California, USA . 10.2514/6.2016-2042. AIAA paper 2016-2042

  4. Arivoli D, Singh I (2016) Self-adaptive flaps on low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers. Aerospace Sci Technol 59:78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arivoli D, Singh I, Suriyanarayanan P (2019) Rudimentary Emulation of Covert Feathers on Low-AR Wings for Poststall Lift Enhancement. AIAA J 58(2):501–516. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Azuma A (2006) The biokinetics of flying and swimming. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.862502

  7. Bechert D, Bruse M, Hage W, Meyer R, (1997) Biological surfaces and their technological application-laboratory and flight experiments on drag reduction and separation control. In: Proceedings of the 28\({}^{th}\) AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. Snowmass Village, CO, USA . 10.2514/6.1997-1960

  8. Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W, Meyer R (2000) Fluid mechanics of biological surfaces and their technological application. Naturwissenschaften 87(4):157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bramesfeld G, Maughmer MD (2002) Experimental investigation of self-actuating, upper-surface, high-lift-enhancing effectors. J Aircr 39(1):120–124. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carruthers AC, Thomas ALR, Taylor GK (2007) Automatic aeroelastic devices in the wings of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis. J Exp Biol 210(23):4136–4149. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.011197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickinson MH, Götz KG (1993) Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Experimental Biology 174(1), 45–64 . https://jeb.biologists.org/content/174/1/45

  12. Duan C, Waite J, Wissa A, (2018) Design optimization of a covert feather-inspired deployable structure for increased lift. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Aviation Forum, Session: Bio-Inspired Aerodynamics, paper AIAA 2018-3174. Atlanta, Georgia, USA . 10.2514/6.2018-3174

  13. Evers JH, (2007) Biological inspiration for agile autonomous air vehicles. Tech. rep., AIR FORCE RESEARCH LAB EGLIN AFB FL MUNITIONS DIRECTORATE . https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA478688.pdf

  14. Han J, Hui Z, Tian F, Chen G (2020) Review on bio-inspired flight systems and bionic aerodynamics. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.03.036

  15. Ito MR, Duan C, Chamorro LP, Wissa AA (2018) A leading-edge alula-inspired device (LEAD) for stall mitigation and lift enhancement for low Reynolds number finite wings. In: Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems – SMASIS2018. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, San Antonio, TX, USA

  16. John Wang CHJ, Schlüter J (2012) Stall control with feathers: self-activated flaps on finite wings at low Reynolds numbers. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 340(1-2), 57–66 . 10.1016/j.crme.2011.11.001

  17. Johnston J, Gopalarathnam A (2012) Investigation of a bio-inspired lift-enhancing effector on a 2D airfoil. Bioinspiration Biomim 7(3):036003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/7/3/036003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kernstine K, Moore C, Cutler A, Mittal R (2008) Initial characterization of self-activated movable flaps,“pop-up feathers”. In: Proceedings of the 46\({}^{th}\) AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA . 10.2514/6.2008-369. AIAA paper 2008-369

  19. Meyer R, Hage W, Bechert DW, Schatz M, Knacke T, Thiele F (2007) Separation control by self-activated movable flaps. AIAA J 45(1):191–199. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.23507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosti ME, Kamps L, Bruecker C, Omidyeganeh M, Pinelli A (2017) The PELskin project-part V: towards the control of the flow around aerofoils at high angle of attack using a self-activated deployable flap. Meccanica 52(8):1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0524-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosti ME, Omidyeganeh M, Pinelli A (2018) Passive control of the flow around unsteady aerofoils using a self-activated deployable flap. J Turbulence 19(3):204–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2017.1314486

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Schlüter JU (2010) Lift enhancement at low reynolds numbers using self-activated movable flaps. J Aircr 47(1):348–351. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Selig MS, Guglielmo JJ, Broeren AP, Giguere P (1995) Summary of low speed airfoil data - Volume 1. SOARTECH publications

  24. Stinton D (1998) The anatomy of the aeroplane, second edn. Wiley-Blackwell

  25. Traub LW, Jaybush L (2010) Experimental investigation of separation control using upper-surface spoilers. J Aircr 47(2):714–718. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.45434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang L, Alam MM, Zhou Y (2019) Experimental study of a passive control of airfoil lift using bioinspired feather flap. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 14(6) . 10.1088/1748-3190/ab3d57

  27. Wolf CC, Gardner AD, Merz CB, Opitz S (2018) Influence of a back-flow flap on the dynamic stall flow topology. CEAS Aeronaut J 9(1):39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-017-0274-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq grants: #306824/2019-1, #404465/2016-1), the Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (CAPES grant #88882.379158/2019-01), and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP grant #2017/02926-9).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil

    David O. D. Izquierdo & Flávio D. Marques

Authors
  1. David O. D. Izquierdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Flávio D. Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David O. D. Izquierdo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Izquierdo, D.O.D., Marques, F.D. Experimental analysis of passive bio-inspired covert feathers for stall and post-stall performance enhancement. Meccanica 56, 2671–2689 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01409-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01409-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation