Skip to main content
Log in

Limit analysis and frictional contact: formulation and numerical solution

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of structural integrity involves the determination of a limit state. If there is plasticity, limit analysis theory takes place. The aim of this paper is to present a limit analysis formulation considering friction at the contact interface. The deduction of this formulation involves the study of contact mechanics, unilateral conditions at normal direction and a slipping rule for the tangential direction. Concerning the contact between a rigid and a deformable body, at limit state there is permanent contact between the bodies and the contact length is supposed known. These hypotheses enable the development of a limit analysis formulation considering friction dissipation. The solution of a limit analysis problem is based on duality between the static, kinematic, mixed and the set of optimum conditions and its relation with the solution of a non-linear programming optimization problem with constraints. The solution is based on Newton method with contraction and relaxation techniques, associated with condensation technique to solve the linear complementarity problem at contact. As an application, the influence of friction coefficient at tool-specimen interface on the wedge indentation is evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jirásek M, Bazǎnt Z (2002) Inelastic analysis of structures. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lubliner J (1990) Plasticity theory. Pearson Education, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen WF, Liu XL (1990) Limit analysis in soil mechanics. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fortunato A, Fabbrocino F, Angelillo M, Fraternali F (2018) Limit analysis of masonry structures with free discontinuities. Meccanica 53:1793–1802

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Nodargi N, Intrigila C, Bisegna P (2019) A variational-based fixed-point algorithm for the limit analysis of dry-masonry block structures with non-associative coulomb friction. Int J Mech Sci 161:105078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trentadue F, Quaranta G (2019) Limit analysis of frictional block assemblies by means of fictitious associative-type contact interface laws. Int J Mech Sci 70:140–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Terrade B, Colas A, Garnier D (2018) Upper bound limit analysis of masonry retaining walls using piv velocity fields. Meccanica 53:1661–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wriggers P (2002) Computational contact mechanics. Wiley, Udine

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Weißenfels C, Wriggers P (2015) Methods to project plasticity models onto the contact surface applied to soil structure interactions. Comput Geotech 65:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu H, Ramière I, Lebon F (2017) On the coupling of local multilevel mesh refinement and zz methods for unilateral frictional contact problems in elastostatics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 323:1–26

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Drucker DC (1953) Coulomb friction, plasticity, and limit loads. J Appl Mech 21:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hamlaoui M, Oueslati A, Saxcé G (2017) A bipotential approach for plastic limit loads of strip footings with non-associated materials. Int J Nonlinear Mech 90:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saxcé G, Bousshine L (1998) Limit analysis theorems for implicit standard materials: application to the unilateral contact with dry friction and the non-associated flow rules in soils and rocks. Int J Mech Sci 40:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalowski R, Mroz Z (1978) Associated and non-associated sliding rules in contact friction problems. Arch Mech 30:259–276

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Moreau JJ (1973) On unilateral constraints friction and plasticity. In: New variational techniques in mathematical physics, pp 171–322

  16. Nguyen QS (2000) Stability and nonlinear solid mechanics. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Figueiredo F, Borges L (2017) Limit analysis formulation for frictional problems. Arch Appl Mech 86:1965–1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klarbring A, Barber JR, Spagnoli A, Terzano M (2017) Shakedown of discrete systems involving plasticity and friction. Eur J Mech A Solids 64:160–164

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Spagnoli A, Terzano T, Barber JR, Klarbring A (2017) Non-linear programming in shakedown analysis with plasticity and friction. J Mech Phys Solids 104:71–83

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zouain N, Borges L, Silveira JL (2014) Quadratic velocity-linear stress interpolations in limit analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 98:469–491

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Borges LA, Zouain N, Huespe AE (1996) A nonlinear optimisation procedure for limit analysis. Eur J Mech A Solids 15:487–512

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Belegundu AD, Chandrupatla TR (2014) Optimization: concepts and applications in engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bazaraa M, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (2006) Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Stavroulakis GE, Antes H (2000) Nonlinear equation approach for inequality elastostatics: a two-dimensional bem implementation. Comput Struct 75:631–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim W, KKawai Koyama H (2007) Metal flow in wedge indentation of v- and w-shaped tools. J Mater Process Technol 18:392–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grunzweig J, Longman IM, Petch NJ (1954) Calculations and measurements on wedge-indentation. J Mech Phys Solids 2:81–86

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maugin G (1992) The thermomechanics of plasticity and fracture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Anton H, Busby RC (2003) Contemporary linear algebra. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Klarbring A, MCiavarella, BJ (2007) Shakedown in elastic contact problems with coulomb friction. Int J Solids Struct 44:8355–8365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saxcé G (1992) Une généralisation de l’inégalité de fenchel et ses applications aux lois constitutives. C R Acad Sci 314:125–129

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Klarbring A (1986) A mathematical programming approach to three-dimensional contact proble with friction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 58:175–200

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Telega JJ, Jemiolo S (2004) New approach to limit analysis theorems for incompressible and compressible materials with non-associated flow rules. Theor Found Civ Eng Pol Ukrain Trans 12:443–450

    Google Scholar 

  33. Taroco EO, Blanco PJ, Feijóo RA (2017) Introducción a la formulación variacional de la mecánica. LNCC/CNPq, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Gurtin ME, Fried E, Anand L (2009) The mechanics and thermodynamics of continua. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Panagiotopoulos P (1975) A nonlinear programming approach to the unilateral contact and friction-boundary value problem in the theory of elasticity. Ing Arch 44:421–432

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Zouain N, Herskovits J, Borges L, Feijóo R (1993) An interative algorithm for limit analysis with nonlinear yield functions. Int J Solids Struct 30:1397–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Borges LA, Feijóo R, Zouain N (1999) A directional error estimator for adaptive limit analysis. Mech Res Commun 26:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Borges L, Zouain N, Costa C, Feijóo R (2001) An adaptative approach to limit analysis. Int J Solids Struct 38:1707–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen WF, Liu XL (1975) Limit analysis and soil plasticity. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of this research by their own institutions, by CAPES and CNPq. This work was supported by CAPES (Grant Number PNPD 31001017030D4) and CNPq (Grant Number 141627/2009.3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio C. Figueiredo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Figueiredo, F.C., Borges, L.A. Limit analysis and frictional contact: formulation and numerical solution. Meccanica 55, 1347–1363 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01167-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01167-5

Keywords

Navigation