Skip to main content
Log in

A novel time dependent cohesive zone model for the debonding interface between solid propellant and insulation

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel time dependent cohesive zone model (CZM) is proposed in this paper based on two main assumptions. Firstly, ultimate cohesive parameters are inherent and fixed for a given non-aging bond interface. The apparent cohesive parameters are time related variables. Secondly, relaxation response of the interface is the main reason for the time dependent traction. Numerical simulation shows that the traction, critical displacement as well as damage initiation displacement will increase with imposed loading rate and parameter λ for single Maxwell box based model. N single Maxwell box connected in parallel construct the N Maxwell box based model, and each Maxwell box bears 1/N traction of the interface. Double cantilever beam (DCB) is utilized to investigate the structure response with the single Maxwell box based model including constant stretch and relaxation test. Quite good agreement between the numerical and experimental reaction force–displacement curves is obtained from stretch test of Double cantilever sandwich beam (DCSB) specimen with four different N Maxwell box based model, especially when the number of the Maxwell box is 7. It is a fact that the model will be more adaptive with more Maxwell box connected in parallel which can be revealed by the verification test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8(2):100–104

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu XP, Needleman A (1993) Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 1(2):111–132

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Needleman A (1987) A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech 54:525–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freed Y, Banks-sills L (2008) A new cohesive model for mixed mode interface fracture in bimaterials. Eng Fract Mech 75(15):4583–4593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dávila C G, Camanho P P (2001) Decohesion elements using two and three-parameter mixed-mode criteria. American helicopter society conference. Williamsburg, VA

  7. Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M (1996) Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol 56(4):439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park K, Paulino GH (2011) Cohesive zone models: a critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces. Appl Mech Rev 64(6):1002–1021

    Google Scholar 

  9. Park K, Paulino GH, Roesler JR (2009) A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 57:891–908

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu CC, Siegmund T, Ramani K (2003) Rate-dependent crack growth in adhesives II. Experiments and analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes 23:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun SY, Chen HR (2011) The interfacial fracture behavior of foam core composite sandwich structures by a viscoelastic cohesive model. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 54(8):1481–1487

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Musto M, Alfano G (2013) A novel rate-dependent cohesive-zone model combining damage and visco-elasticity. Comput Struct 118:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liechti KM, Wu JD (2001) Mixed-mode, time-dependent rubber/metal debonding. J Mech Phys Solids 49:1039–1072

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Corigliano A, Ricci M (2001) Rate-dependent interface models: formulation and numerical applications. Int J Solids Struct 38:547–576

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zreid I, Fleischhauer R, Kaliske M (2013) A thermomechanically coupled viscoelastic cohesive zone model at large deformation. Int J Solids Struct 50:4279–4291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geißler G, Kaliske M, Nase M et al (2007) Peel process simulation of sealed polymeric film computational modelling of experimental results. Eng Comput Int J Comput-Aided Eng Softw 24(6):586–607

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geißler G, Kaliske M (2010) Time-dependent cohesive zone modelling for discrete fracture simulation. Eng Fract Mech 77:153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou FH, Molinari JF, Shioya TS (2005) A rate-dependent cohesive model for simulating dynamic crack propagation in brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 72:1383–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YR, Freitas F, Jung JS et al (2015) Characterization of bitumen fracture using tensile tests incorporated with viscoelastic cohesive zone model. Constr Build Mater 88:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Allen DH, Searcy CR (2001) A micromechanical model for a viscoelastic cohesive zone. Int J Fract 107:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cui HR, Tang GJ, Shen ZB (2017) A three-dimensional viscoelastic constitutive model of solid propellant considering viscoelastic Poisson’s ratio and its implementation. Eur J Mech A Solids 61:235–244

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou QC, Ju YT, Wei Z et al (2014) Cohesive zone modeling of propellant and insulation interface debonding. J Adhes 90:230–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11272348, U1404106).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhibin Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, H., Shen, Z. & Li, H. A novel time dependent cohesive zone model for the debonding interface between solid propellant and insulation. Meccanica 53, 3527–3544 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0894-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0894-3

Keywords

Navigation