Skip to main content
Log in

J. Colin McQuillan: Immanuel Kant: The Very Idea of a Critique of Pure Reason

Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois, 2016, 176 pp

  • Book review
  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Heidegger (1984, p. 122), trans. in Heidegger (1967, p. 120).

  2. Heidegger (1984, pp. 122–123); Heidegger (1967, p. 120–121).

  3. See Lachièze-Rey (1931), Vleeschauwer (1934–1937), Daval (1951); it continues, for e.g., in Grondin (1991). This style of interpretation has a less prominent but still significant presence in German-language scholarship: see, e.g., Wundt (1924).

  4. Heidegger (1991, pp. 124–125, 13–18).

  5. Ameriks (2000, chapter 1).

References

  • Ameriks, Karl. 2000. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daval, Roger. 1951. La Métaphysique de Kant. Perspectives Sur la Métaphysique de Kant d’Après la Théorie du Schématisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, Jean. 1991. Emmanuel Kant. Avant/après. Paris: Criterion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1967. What is a Thing? (trans: W.B. Barton Jr. and Vera Deutsch). South Bend: Gateway.

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1984. Die Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1991. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachièze-Rey, Pierre. 1931. L’idéalisme kantien. Paris: F. Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonelli, Giorgio. 1978. “Critique” and Related Terms Prior to Kant: A Historical Survey. Kant-Studien 69: 119–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vleeschauwer, Herman Jan de. 1934–1937. La déduction transcendantale dans l’oeuvre de Kant. Antwerp: De Sikkel.

  • Wundt, Max. 1924. Kant als Metaphysiker: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der deutschen Philosophie im 18. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: F. Enke.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Howard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howard, S. J. Colin McQuillan: Immanuel Kant: The Very Idea of a Critique of Pure Reason. Cont Philos Rev 50, 403–410 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-017-9428-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-017-9428-2

Navigation