Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of positive affect on consideration set formation in memory-based choice

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although prior research has examined whether positive affect can impact consideration set size in stimulus-based choice, unknown to this point is whether affective influences also characterize memory-based consideration processes. This distinction is important insofar as consideration in memory-based choice entails psychological processes (including those involving the accessibility of brands) that are unique to choice undertaken in memory-based settings. Experiment 1 provides an initial demonstration of positive affect’s ability to shape memory-based consideration by documenting that positive (versus neutral) affect leads to larger consideration sets. Two additional experiments extend these findings by showing that the influence of positive affect on consideration set size is moderated by characteristics of brands (typicality) and consumers (regulatory focus). Experiment 2 demonstrates that this increase in memory-based consideration set size is attributable to a greater number of atypical, but not typical, brands being considered under positive affect. Experiment 3 documents the moderating effect exerted by consumers’ regulatory focus by showing that the ability of positive affect to increase consideration set size is more likely for consumers high (but not low) on promotion focus. The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed as are suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W., & Romeo, J. B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(December), 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from“ feeling right.”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, T. E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, K. K., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). Descriptive characteristics of memory-based consideration sets: influence of usage occasion frequency and usage location familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(December), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorikhin, A., & Patrick, V. (2010). Positive mood and resistance to temptation: the interfering influence of elevated arousal. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(December), 698–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Burlington: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbach, A., & Labroo, A. A. (2007). Be better or be merry: how mood affects self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Bianco, A. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: the role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., Chen, Q., Tam, L., & Lee, R. P. (2014). Managing sub-branding affect transfer: The role of consideration set size and brand loyalty. Marketing Letters, forthcoming.

  • Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: the case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. (2000). Tory. Making a good decision: value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntsinger, J. R. (2012). Does positive affect broaden and negative affect narrow attentional scope? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 595–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntsinger, J. R. (2011). Mood and trust in intuition interactively orchestrate correspondence between implicit and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1245–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1206–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Niedenthal, P. M., & Cantor, N. (1992). An influence of positive affect on social categorization. Motivation and Emotion, 16(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: a cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B. E., & Isen, A. M. (1993). The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(September), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B. E., Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., Bundorf, K., Draganska, M., et al. (2014). Consumer and managerial goals in assortment choice and design. Marketing Letters, 25(3), 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardes, F. R., Kalyanaram, G., Chandrashekaran, M., & Dornoff, R. J. (1993). Brand retrieval, consideration set composition, consumer choice, and the pioneering advantage. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(June), 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labroo, A. A., & Patrick, V. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 800–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., & Sternthal, B. (1999). The effects of positive mood on memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(September), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1122–1134.

  • Lockwood, P., Jorndan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1982). Memory and attentional factors in consumer choice: concepts and research methods. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratneshwar, S., Pechmann, C., & Shocker, A. D. (1996). Goal-derived categories and the antecedents of across-category consideration. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(December), 240–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spassova, G., & Isen, A. M. (2013). Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 89(4), 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, K. P., Carter, R. E., Barone, M. J., Janakiraman, R., & Bezawada, R. (2015). Tis better to give than receive? How and when gender and residence-based segments predict choice of discount- versus donation-based promotions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, forthcoming.

  • Winterich, K. P., & Barone, M. J. (2011). Warm glow or cold, hard cash? Social identity effects on consumer choice for donation versus discount promotions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(October), 855–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Barone.

Additional information

Order of authorship was determined alphabetically.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barone, M.J., Fedorikhin, A. & Hansen, D.E. The influence of positive affect on consideration set formation in memory-based choice. Mark Lett 28, 59–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9395-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9395-5

Keywords

Navigation