Abstract
Although prior research has examined whether positive affect can impact consideration set size in stimulus-based choice, unknown to this point is whether affective influences also characterize memory-based consideration processes. This distinction is important insofar as consideration in memory-based choice entails psychological processes (including those involving the accessibility of brands) that are unique to choice undertaken in memory-based settings. Experiment 1 provides an initial demonstration of positive affect’s ability to shape memory-based consideration by documenting that positive (versus neutral) affect leads to larger consideration sets. Two additional experiments extend these findings by showing that the influence of positive affect on consideration set size is moderated by characteristics of brands (typicality) and consumers (regulatory focus). Experiment 2 demonstrates that this increase in memory-based consideration set size is attributable to a greater number of atypical, but not typical, brands being considered under positive affect. Experiment 3 documents the moderating effect exerted by consumers’ regulatory focus by showing that the ability of positive affect to increase consideration set size is more likely for consumers high (but not low) on promotion focus. The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed as are suggestions for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W., & Romeo, J. B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(December), 386–400.
Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from“ feeling right.”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, T. E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117–132.
Desai, K. K., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). Descriptive characteristics of memory-based consideration sets: influence of usage occasion frequency and usage location familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(December), 309–323.
Fedorikhin, A., & Patrick, V. (2010). Positive mood and resistance to temptation: the interfering influence of elevated arousal. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(December), 698–711.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Burlington: Academic Press.
Fishbach, A., & Labroo, A. A. (2007). Be better or be merry: how mood affects self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 158.
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66.
Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631–636.
Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Bianco, A. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 148–164.
Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: the role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1–6.
He, Y., Chen, Q., Tam, L., & Lee, R. P. (2014). Managing sub-branding affect transfer: The role of consideration set size and brand loyalty. Marketing Letters, forthcoming.
Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: the case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 177–191.
Higgins, E. (2000). Tory. Making a good decision: value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217.
Huntsinger, J. R. (2012). Does positive affect broaden and negative affect narrow attentional scope? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 595–600.
Huntsinger, J. R. (2011). Mood and trust in intuition interactively orchestrate correspondence between implicit and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1245–1258.
Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1206–1217.
Isen, A. M., Niedenthal, P. M., & Cantor, N. (1992). An influence of positive affect on social categorization. Motivation and Emotion, 16(1), 65–78.
Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: a cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 1–12.
Kahn, B. E., & Isen, A. M. (1993). The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(September), 257–270.
Kahn, B. E., Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., Bundorf, K., Draganska, M., et al. (2014). Consumer and managerial goals in assortment choice and design. Marketing Letters, 25(3), 293–303.
Kardes, F. R., Kalyanaram, G., Chandrashekaran, M., & Dornoff, R. J. (1993). Brand retrieval, consideration set composition, consumer choice, and the pioneering advantage. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(June), 62–75.
Labroo, A. A., & Patrick, V. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 800–809.
Lee, A. Y., & Sternthal, B. (1999). The effects of positive mood on memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(September), 115–127.
Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1122–1134.
Lockwood, P., Jorndan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854–864.
Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1982). Memory and attentional factors in consumer choice: concepts and research methods. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 18–37.
Ratneshwar, S., Pechmann, C., & Shocker, A. D. (1996). Goal-derived categories and the antecedents of across-category consideration. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(December), 240–250.
Spassova, G., & Isen, A. M. (2013). Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 89(4), 397–408.
Winterich, K. P., Carter, R. E., Barone, M. J., Janakiraman, R., & Bezawada, R. (2015). Tis better to give than receive? How and when gender and residence-based segments predict choice of discount- versus donation-based promotions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, forthcoming.
Winterich, K. P., & Barone, M. J. (2011). Warm glow or cold, hard cash? Social identity effects on consumer choice for donation versus discount promotions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(October), 855–868.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Order of authorship was determined alphabetically.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barone, M.J., Fedorikhin, A. & Hansen, D.E. The influence of positive affect on consideration set formation in memory-based choice. Mark Lett 28, 59–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9395-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9395-5