Skip to main content
Log in

Brand personality: A meta-analytic review of antecedents and consequences

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a meta-analysis on brand personality (BP) by investigating the antecedents and consequences of the BP dimensions of sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication, and ruggedness, as suggested by Aaker (Journal of Marketing Research 34:347–356, 1997). The authors synthesize the results from 76 independent samples in 56 studies. The meta-analysis finds several new empirical generalizations about BP. First, the key drivers of BP are communication with hedonic benefit claims, branding activities, a brand’s country-of-origin, and consumer personalities. Second, the study finds that the effects of BP are stronger for mature brands than for brands in the early life cycle stages. Third, sincerity and competence have the strongest influence on brand success variables (e.g., brand attitude, image, commitment, purchase intention), while excitement and ruggedness have the weakest influence on brand attitude and brand commitment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. L., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). Why good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggrawal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude–behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, F. K. (2003). College student attitudes toward advertising's ethical, economic, and social consequences. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(3), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, W. O., Hardesty, D. M., & Rose, R. L. (2001). Consumer self-confidence: refinements in conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: a framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, P.-L., & Chieng, M.-H. (2006). Building consumer–brand relationship: a cross-cultural experiential view. Psychology and Marketing, 23(11), 927–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernev, A., Hamilton, R., & Gal, D. (2011). Competing for consumer identity: limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds: towards an understanding of consciousness. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., Smith, G., & Grime, I. (2005). The impact of brand extensions on brand personality: experimental evidence. European Journal of Marketing, 39(1/2), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A., & Hole, G. (2003). How to design and report experiments. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johar, G. V., Sengupta, J., & Aaker, J. L. (2005). Two roads to updating brand personality impressions: trait versus evaluative inferencing. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2008). Strategic brand management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and branding: research findings and future priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, E. A. C., & Ang, S. H. (2008). Hedonic vs. utilitarian consumption: a cross-cultural perspective based on cultural conditioning. Journal of Business Research, 61, 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. T. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research methods series. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand expressions. Journal of Marketing, 72, 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Jolibert, A. J. P. (1995). A meta-analysis of country-of-origin-effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 883–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., Lehman, D. R., & Farley, J. U. (1990). Estimating publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethuraman, R., Tellis, G. J., & Briesch, R. A. (2011). How well does advertising work? Generalizations from meta-analysis of brand advertising elasticities. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J. M. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y., & Kim, J. (2010). Effects of brand personality on brand trust and brand affect. Psychology and Marketing, 27(7), 639–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29(943–951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Troy, L. C., Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2008). Cross-functional integration and new product success: an empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing, 72, 132–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, C., Bang, H.-K., & Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of a consistent ad series on consumer evaluations. A test of the repetition–variation hypothesis in a South Korean context. International Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Eisend.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisend, M., Stokburger-Sauer, N.E. Brand personality: A meta-analytic review of antecedents and consequences. Mark Lett 24, 205–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9232-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9232-7

Keywords

Navigation