Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics in corporate political action: can lobbying be just?

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article takes issue with the potential injustice of political systems in which the possibility of voicing specific interests depends on the availability of financial resources. Previous empirical analysis suggests that the interests of private companies, alone or grouped into associations, are more strongly represented than other interests, such as those of NGOs and unions. Even if ethical analysis of corporate political action is growing, previous studies mainly address this general issue without a specific focus on lobbying activities. This study specifically aims at contributing to the analysis of the ethics of lobbying activities. In particular, we propose the use of justice as a criterion for ethically assessing lobbying activities. To this aim, we provide some definitions of lobbying activity, with particular reference to the contexts of Europe and the USA. Then, we introduce the problem of the legitimacy of lobbying activities, particularly in relation to the opportunities that stakeholders have for influencing political processes. Moreover, we analyze different notions of justice, in order to build a conceptual framework to be used in ethically assessing lobbying activities. Finally, we present four case studies of lobbying to be analyzed through the framework previously developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal–lobbying/.

  2. http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/statistics.do?action=prepareView&locale=en#en.

  3. Agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commission on the establishment of a transparency register for organizations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation. L191/29. Official Journal of the European Union, 22/07/2011.

  4. Honest Leadership and Open Government Act, Title 2 (Chapter 26).

  5. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal–lobbying/.

  6. https://corporateeurope.org/.

  7. EU n. 2016/679.

  8. https://lobbyplag.eu.

  9. https://www.Integritywatch.eu.

  10. https://www.Integritywatch.eu.

  11. Amazon, Google and Facebook are members of Digital Europe, whereas only Google and Facebook are members of Amcham EU.

  12. However, Kantian and Utilitarian principles may produce very different judgment, as the Kantian principle of human dignity suggests that a decision cannot be made on the grounds that a larger group of stakeholders benefits from that decision (Bowie, 2017).

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allard, N. W. (2008). Lobbying is an honorable profession: The right to petition and the competition to be right. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 19(1), 23–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzola, M. (2013). Corporate dystopia: The Ethics of corporate political spending. Business & Society, 52(3), 388–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. (2008). Responsible lobbying? Business case P–57. Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

  • Baysinger, B. D., Keim, G. D., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1985). An empirical evaluation of the potential for including shareholders in corporate constituency programs. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 180–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (2001). Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest groups involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1191–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria for fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). JAI Press.

  • Bonardi, J. P., Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2005). The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, P. (2009). The European Commission. In D. Coen & J. Richardson (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, actors, and issues (pp. 19–38). Oxford University Press.

  • Bowie, N. E. (2017). Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Cambridge University Press.

  • Cavanagh, G. F., Moberg, D. J., & Velasquez, M. (1981). The ethics of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. L. (1997). The new federalism: Implications for the legitimacy of corporate political activity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(3), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S., & Spence, L. (2019). Business ethics. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 1919–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Stein, J. H. (2009). Organizational justice and behavioral ethics: Promises and prospects. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 193–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2010). The role of nongovernmental organizations in the business–government–society interface. Business & Society, 49(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahan, N. M., Hadani, M., & Schuler, D. A. (2013). The governance challenges of corporate political activity. Business & Society, 52(3), 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dur, A., & De Bièvre, D. (2007). Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European trade policy. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espach, R. (2006). When is sustainable forestry sustainable? The Forest Stewardship Council in Argentina and Brazil. Global Environmental Politics, 6(2), 55–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (2009). The capture theory of regulations-revisited. Society, 46(4), 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission. (2006). Green Paper. European Transparency Initiative. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1e468b07-27ba-46bc-a613-0ab96fc10aa9.

  • Fortin, M., & Fellenz, M. R. (2008). Hypocrisies of fairness: Towards a more reflexive ethical base in organizational justice research and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C., Post, J. E., & Davis, K. (1992). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy, Ethics. McGraw–Hill.

  • Freeman, S. (2000). Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29(4), 371–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y. (2008). An ethical judgment framework for corporate political actions. Journal of Public Affairs., 8(3), 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Gray, V., & Lowery, D. (1997). Reconceptualising PAC formation: It’s not a collective action problem and may be arms race. American Political Quarterly, 25(3), 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1994). Three normative models of democracy. Constellations, 1(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. MIT Press.

  • Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other. MIT Press.

  • Hamilton, J. B., & Hoch, D. (1997). Ethical standards for business lobbying: Some practical suggestions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(3), 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J., Moriarty, J., & Norman, W. (2010). Business ethics and (or as) political philosophy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (1995). International variation in the business–government interface: Institutional and organizational considerations. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. A. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanpur, N., & Newman, A. L. (2019). The MNC–Coalition paradox: Issue salience, foreign firms and the General Data Protection Regulation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(3), 448–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keffer, J. M., & Hill, R. P. (1997). An ethical approach to lobbying activities of businesses in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12–13), 1371–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim, G. D., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1986). Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making: A review and contingency approach. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 828–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. (1964). Politics, parties, and pressure groups. Crowell.

  • Kluver, H. (2013). Lobbying in the European Union. Oxford University Press.

  • Leong, S., Hazelton, J., & Townley, C. (2013). Managing the risks of corporate political donations: A utilitarian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingane, A., & Olsen, S. (2004). Guidelines for social return on investment. California Management Review, 46(3), 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclntyre, A. C. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Mahoney, C. (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1996). Temporal consistency and policy credibility: Why democracies need non–majoritarian institutions. European University Institute, Working Paper RSC No 96/57.

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2005). Humanizing business: A modem virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2008). Re–imagining the morality of management: A modem virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Néron, P. (2010). Business and the polis: What does it mean to see corporations as political actors? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Néron, P. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post–citizens united era: Political equality, corporate citizenship, and market failures. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 715–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberholzer-Gee, F., Cantrill, L., & Wu, P. (2007). Note on lobbying. Harvard Business School Background Note 707-471. Harvard Business School Publishing.

  • Oberman, W. D. (2004). A framework for the ethical analysis of corporate political activity. Business and Society Review, 109(2), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostas, D. T. (2007). The law and ethics of K street: Lobbying, the First Amendment, and the duty to create just laws. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 33–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. (2007). Democratizing European chemicals policy: Do consultations favour civil society participation? Journal of Civil Society, 3(3), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. E., Lawrence, A.T., & Weber, J. (1999). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy, ethics, (10th Edn.). McGraw–Hill.

  • Ramanna, K., & Muthuram, V. (2015). Wal–Mart lobbying in India? Harvard Business School Case 114-023. Harvard Business School Publishing.

  • Ramanna, K., & Sucker, S. J. (2013). Business and government: Campaign contributions and lobbying in the United States. Module Note 9-113-037. Harvard Business School Publishing.

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Belknap Press.

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.

  • Rose, C. S., & Sesia Jr., A. (2011). Note on lobbying and the Dodd–Frank financial reforms. Harvard Business School Technical Note, 311-094. Harvard Business School Publishing.

  • Rupp, D. E., & Bell, C. M. (2010). Extending the deontic model of justice: Moral self–regulation in third–party responses to injustice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, S. (2008). Interest groups and democracy in the European Union. West European Politics, 31(6), 1274–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A., & Polzer, J. (2012). School based HPV vaccination for girls in Ontario. In Canadian Institute for Health Research—Institute of Population and Public Health, Population and public health ethics: Cases from research, policy and practice (pp. 103–106). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto—Joint Centre for Bioethics.

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  • Schepers, D. H. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D. A., Rehbein, K., & Cramer, R. D. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M. B. (1995). The internal dynamics of environmental organizations: Movement interest groups, communal advocacy groups, and the policy process. Review of Policy Research, 14(1–2), 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, A. (2010). Business in politics: Lobbying and corporate campaign contributions. In G. G. Brenkert & T. L. Beauchamp (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics (pp. 501–534). Oxford University Press.

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, G. T. (2010). Lobbies, professional. In G. T. Kurian (Ed.), The encyclopedia of political sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 970–971). Congressional Quarterly Press.

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Truman, D. B. (1951). The governmental process. Political interests and public opinion. Knopf.

  • Walker, T. Y, Elam–Evans, L.D., Singleton, J.A., Yankey, D., Markowitz, L.E., Fredua, B., Williams, C.L., Meyer, S.A., & Stokley, S. (2017). National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Report 2017, 66(33), 874–882.

  • Weber, L. J. (1996). Citizenship and democracy: The ethics of corporate lobbying. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 253–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Sage.

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Edoardo Mollona

  2. Department of Economics and Law, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy

    Guglielmo Faldetta

Authors
  1. Edoardo Mollona
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guglielmo Faldetta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guglielmo Faldetta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mollona, E., Faldetta, G. Ethics in corporate political action: can lobbying be just?. J Manag Gov 26, 1245–1276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09583-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09583-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation