Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do boards of directors foster strategic change? A dynamic managerial capabilities perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the dynamic relationships between managerial human capital, dynamic managerial capabilities and strategic change within boards of directors. Building on the dynamic managerial capabilities perspective and upper echelons theory, we theorize and investigate the impact of managerial human capital on strategic change as well as the mediating role of boards’ sensing, seizing and reconfiguring abilities, defined as dynamic managerial capabilities. The hypotheses are tested on a sample of 606 Norwegian firms. The main findings suggest that while managerial human capital positively impacts strategic change, boards’ sensing and seizing abilities (not reconfiguring) positively mediate the relationship between human capital and strategic change. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1011–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Strategic renewal of organizations. Organization Science, 20(2), 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 415–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2008). Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organization Studies, 29(8–9), 1187–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization Studies, 20(2), 410–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. B., & Wiersema, M. F. (2013). Executive decision making: Linking dynamic managerial capabilities to the resource portfolio and strategic outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(4), 408–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendig, D., Strese, S., Flatten, T. C., da Costa, M. E. S., & Brettel, M. (2018). On micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities: A multi-level perspective based on CEO personality and knowledge-based capital. Long Range Planning, 51(6), 797–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensinger, G., & Nicas, J. (2016). Alphabet executive David Drummond leaves Uber board. The Wall Street Journal. NYC.

  • Buyl, T., Boone, C., & Matthyssens, P. (2011). Upper echelons research and managerial cognition. Strategic Organization, 9(3), 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A. (2000). The Price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1179–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. M. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. (1991). Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management, 17(1), 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. (2001). The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 661–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. The Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2015). Survey measures of first- and second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2174–2188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2013). Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 295–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2003). Micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises: Definition and scope. In EU (Ed.), EUR-Lex—n26026.

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Perspective, 17(2), 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance; Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson, J., & Winlund, H. (2000). Boards of directors in small and medium-sized industrial firms: Examining the effects of the board’s working style on board task performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1087–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Journal of Management, 38(1), 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Journal, 9(2), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19(3), 381–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. J. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 1145–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., et al. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2014). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: A perspective on the relationship between managers, creativity, and innovation. In C. E. Shalley, M. A. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship (p. 421). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, K., & Kiel, G. (2004). The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 500–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, P., & Nadkarni, S. (2014). Managing strategic change: The duality of CEO personality. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1318–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S65–S79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. (2007). Boards, governance and value creation: The human side of corporate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M., & Rindova, V. (2001). Stakeholders’ expectations of board roles: The case of subsidiary boards. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 507–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, P., Jones, C. D., & Boivie, S. (2014). Director human capital, information processing demands, and board effectiveness. Journal of Management, 40(2), 557–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., & Mesko, A. (2013). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F. (2008). Outside directors’ industry-specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1345–1355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2008). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4), 981–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., & Wu, L.-Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 407–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A. (2011). Dynamic managerial capabilities and the multibusiness team: The role of episodic teams in executive leadership groups. Organization Science, 22(1), 118–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. (1999). Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20(1), 47–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minichilli, A., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2007). Board evaluations: Making a fit between the purpose and the system. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 609–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minichilli, A., & Hansen, C. (2007). The board advisory tasks in small firms and the event of crises. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 33(2), 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, G. C., & Barker, V. L. (1997). Upper echelons and board characteristics of turnaround and nonturnaround declining firms. Journal of Business Research, 39, 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(12), 2369–2392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1991). The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y.-S., & Fang, C.-P. (2010). Acquisition experience, board characteristics, and acquisition behavior. Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 502–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M., Di Stefano, G., & Verona, G. (2013). The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1389–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M., & Petersen, S. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P.-J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. L., & Huse, M. (2011). Corporate governance in Norway: Women and employee-elected board members. In C. A. Mallin (Ed.), Handbook on international corporate governance (pp. 121–146). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seierstad, C., & Opsahl, T. (2011). For the few not the many? The effects of affirmative action on presence, prominence, and social capital of women directors in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellevoll, T., Huse, M., & Hansen, C. (2007). The value creating board. Results from the “follow-up surveys” 2005/2006 in Norwegian firms. Oslo: Norwegian School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W., & Gentry, R. J. (2012). A cyclical view of the relationship between corporate governance and strategic management. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(4), 959–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, T. (2015). Cisco’s Chambers: ‘Disrupt yourself, or be disrupted’ CRN.

  • Stiles, P. (2001). The impact of the board on strategy: An empirical examination. Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), 627–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J. J., Haleblian, J. J., & Rajagopalan, N. (2011). The effects of board human and social capital on investor reactions to new CEO selection. Strategic Management Journal, 32(7), 731–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ees, H., van der Laan, G., & Postma, T. J. B. M. (2008). Effective board behavior in the Netherlands. European Management Journal, 26(2), 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, B. A., Kroll, M., & Wright, P. (2008). CEO ownership and effective boards: Impacts on firm outcomes. Strategic Organization, 6(3), 259–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1113–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., & Örtqvist, D. (2010). Does network board capital matter? A study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamak, S., Nielsen, S., & Escriba-Esteve, A. (2013). The role of external environment in upper echelons theory: A review of existing literature and future research directions. Group and Organization Management, 39(1), 69–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. (1990). Increasing the board’s involvement in strategy. Long Range Planning, 23(6), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Filatotchev, I. (2004). Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management studies, 41(5), 885–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Neubaum, D., & Huse, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26(5), 947–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zattoni, A., Gnan, L., & Huse, M. (2015). Does family involvement influence firm performance? Exploring the mediating effects of board processes and tasks. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1214–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, P. (2010). Board information and strategic tasks performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 473–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, P. (2011). Power and trust in board–CEO relationships. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(3), 745–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zona, F., & Zattoni, A. (2007). Beyond the black box of demography: Board processes and task effectiveness within Italian firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 852–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á., de la Fuente-Sabaté, J. M., & Suárez-González, I. (2005). Facilitating and inhibiting factors behind strategic change: Evidence in the Spanish private banking industry, 1983–1997. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(3), 235–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business, Strategy and Political Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Grønland 58, 3045, Drammen, Norway

    Carl Åberg

  2. INSEEC U. Research Center, International University of Monaco, Fontvieille, Monaco

    Mariateresa Torchia

Authors
  1. Carl Åberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariateresa Torchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Åberg.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Åberg, C., Torchia, M. Do boards of directors foster strategic change? A dynamic managerial capabilities perspective. J Manag Gov 24, 655–684 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09462-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09462-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation