Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interdependence and accounting information exchanges in inter-firm relationships

  • Published:
Journal of Management & Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

These days, the locus of business operations is difficult to define and is subject to continuous modifications. On the one hand, firms form clusters of quasi-integrated partners; on the other, they outsource internal activities to external entities. Such inter-firm relationships have been studied in both the strategic and organizational fields, because they possess specific characteristics that challenge the extant theoretical frameworks and conclusions. Management accounting scholars have recently recognized the importance of these agreements and have started to study inter-organizational accounting information sharing, which supports inter-firm collaboration. Yet, the conditions that foster the exchange of this information between external partners, i.e., open book accounting, are still underexplored. Through some exploratory evidence, and a case study in the fashion industry, we focus on analysing one under-investigated factor, i.e., interdependence, suggesting that, ceteris paribus, this variable may explain several functions played by the accounting information in inter-organizational settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hoffjan and Kruse (2006) maintained that a consistent definition of open book accounting has not yet emerged. They observed that in the literature, different terms are used in connection with the concept, e.g., open book costing and open book transparency. Open book accounting (OBA) is defined by the two authors as the systematic disclosure of cost information between legally independent business partners beyond corporate borders (Hoffjan and Kruse 2006: 40). Such information, being regularly disclosed, is standardized (Kulmala 2002). They also say that OBA refers to the use of information that is located in the sphere of influence of another company within the value chain and is usually confidential. Hoffjan and Kruse (2006), referring to McIvor (2001: 236), specified that open book costing is unilateral OBA, where only the suppliers disclose information. It is the customer who requires the supplier to share the component cost information as part of the process of improvement and cost reduction. Cost transparency, instead (Lamming 1993), refers to the two-way sharing of cost information between suppliers and customers. Both partners are then aware of the relevant dimensions of the reciprocal cost structures and are able to implement common cost improvement initiatives.

  2. Though we acknowledge that other management accounting contributions (Keating 1997; Bushman et al. 1995; Lambert 2001; Abernethy and Vagnoni 2004; Bouwens and van Lent 2007) have examined the issue of interdependence, they have not been explicitly taken into consideration here, because their research questions and the related definition of interdependence are substantially different from ours. More specifically, these authors investigate how the dependence on other business units’ actions impacts on the performance of the business unit under study, and vice versa.

  3. Fashion firms sell products that change quickly, in response to the shifting tastes and preferences of customers. This causes demand variation in styles and colours of garments. In addition, new fashion products are launched at least twice a year. Such specifics generate particular challenges to both the fashion firm and its suppliers. On the one hand, the time to design, manufacture, and distribute fashion products needs to be minimized, thus calling for tight collaboration between all the firms involved at various stages of the supply chain. On the other hand, once a product has been marketed, there is the potential to achieve volume and colour flexibility as a result not only of the ability of the manufacturers to change production rates, but also of the capacity of the suppliers to dye the garments as late as possible in response to demand for particular colours (Holland and Lockett 1997).

  4. As agreed with the respondents, the results will be presented in an anonymous form.

  5. All respondent firms produce and sell finished garments. They have outsourced one or more manufacturing activities to firms with whom they have established collaborative relationships and/or they distribute their products through external trade partners.

  6. For a description of the enabling conditions of the OBA, refer to Section II.

  7. On the issue of restricted access in inter-organizational studies, see: Dekker (2003) and Coad and Cullen (2006).

  8. This form is called putting-out. To this end, see Mariotti and Cainarca (1986) and Grandori and Soda (1995).

References

  • Abernethy, M. A., & Vagnoni, E. (2004). Power, organization design and managerial behaviour. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3–4), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson, B., Laage-Hellman, J., & Nilsson, U. (2002). Modern management accounting for modern purchasing. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(1), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, S., & Rajan, M. V. (2002). Incentive issues in inter-firm relationships. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T., Cullen, J., Seal, W., Ahmed, A., & Dunlop, A. (2000). The consequences of inter-firm supply chains for management accounting. London: CIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwens, J., & Van Lent, L. (2007). Assessing the performance of business unit managers. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(4), 667–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busco, C., Riccaboni, A., & Scapens, R. W. (2006). Trust for accounting and accounting for trust. Management Accounting Research, 17(1), 11–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R., Indjejikian, R., & Smith, A. (1995). Aggregate performance measures in business unit manager compensation: The role of intrafirm interdependencies. Journal of Accounting Research, 33, 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caglio, A., & Ditillo, A. (2008a). Controlling collaboration between firms. How to build and maintain successful relationships with external partners. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caglio, A., & Ditillo, A. (2008b). A review and discussion of management control in inter-firm relationships: Achievements and future directions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 865–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C., & Ng, J. (1995). Total cost control: Nissan and its UK supplier partnerships. Management Accounting Research, 6(4), 347–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, W. F., & Mahama, H. (2007). The effect of network ties on accounting controls in a supply alliance: Field study evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 47–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad, A. F., & Cullen, J. (2006). Inter-organizational cost management: Towards an evolutionary perspective. Management Accounting Research, 17, 342–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Slagmulder, R. (2004). Interorganizational cost management and relational context. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuganesan, S., & Lee, R. (2006). Intra-organizational influences in procurement networks controls: The impacts of information technology. Management Accounting Research, 17, 141–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, H. C. (2003). Value chain analysis in interfirm relationships: A field study. Management Accounting Research, 14, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, H. C. (2004). Control of inter-organizational relationships: Evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(1), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M. L., & Ainamo, A. (2005). The Telecom Industry as cultural industry? The transposition of fashion logics into the field of mobile telephony. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 23, 45–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Ouchi, W. G. (1993). Japanese-style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forza, C., & Vinelli, A. (1996). An analytical scheme for the change of the apparel design process towards quick response. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 8(4), 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gietzmann, A. (1996). Incomplete contracts and the make of buy decisions: Governance design and attainable flexibility. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(6), 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gietzmann, M. B., & Larsen, J. G. (1998). Motivating subcontractors to perform development and design tasks. Management Accounting Research, 9(3).

  • Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995). Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Lind, J. (2007). Accounting in an interorganizational setting. In C. S. Chapman, A. J. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of management accounting research, 2, Elsevier, pp. 885–902.

  • Harrison, B. (1994). Lean and mean: The changing landscape of corporate power in the age of flexibility. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffjan, A., & Kruse, H. (2006). Open book accounting in supply chains—when and how is it used in practice? Cost Management (November/December), pp. 40–47.

  • Holland, C. P., & Lockett, A. G. (1997). Mixed mode network structures: The strategic use of electronic communication by organizations. Organization Science, 8(5), 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2001). Co-evolution of entrepreneurial career, institutional rules and competitive dynamics in American Film, 1895–1920. Organization Studies, 22(6), 911–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajüter, P., & Kulmala, H. (2005). Open-book accounting in networks potential achievements and reasons for failures. Management Accounting Research, 16(2), 179–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, A. S. (1997). Determinants of divisional performance evaluation practices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(3), 243–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, L., & Harland, C. (2005). Managing supply networks: Organizational roles in network management. European Management Journal, 23(3), 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, E., Kincade, D., & Brown, J. R. (2000). Impact of business type upon the adoption of quick response technologies: The apparel industry experience. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(9), 1093–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulmala, H. I. (2002). Open-book accounting in networks. Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 51, 157–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R. A. (2001). Contracting theory and accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 3–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R. (1993). Beyond partnership. Strategies for innovation and lean supply. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C., & Yeung, M. (1995). Communications: Quick response in clothing merchandising: A study of the buying office using network analyses. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 7(4), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., Moore, M. A., Kincade, D., & Avery, C. (2002). Dimensions of apparel manufacturing strategy and production management. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 14(1), 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipparini, A., & Fratocchi, L. (1999). The capabilities of the transnational firm: Accessing knowledge and leveraging inter-firm relationships. European Management Journal, 17(6), 655–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahama, H. (2006). Management control systems, cooperation and performance in strategic supply relationships: A survey in the mines. Management Accounting Research, 17, 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, S., & Cainarca, G. (1986). Evolution of transaction governance in the textile-clothing industry. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 7(4), 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, R. (2001). Lean supply: The design and cost reduction dimensions. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7, 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, J., Hansen, A., & Hansen, C. Ø. (2001). Interorganizational controls and organizational competencies: Episodes around target cost management/functional analysis and open book accounting. Management Accounting Research, 12, 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Helper, S. (1998). The ‘close but adversarial’ model of supplier relations in the US auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 775–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munday, M. (1992). Accounting cost data disclosure and buyer-supplier partnerships—a research note. Management Accounting Research, 3, 245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, B., Jones, J., & Espenlaub, S. (2006). Transaction costs and control of outsourced accounting: Case evidence from India. Management Accounting Research, 17(3), 238–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishigushi, T. (1994). Strategic industrial sourcing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius, K., & Kirsten, J. (2005). The boundaries of the firm: Why do sugar producers outsource sugarcane production? Management Accounting Research, 16, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seal, W. (2004). Towards an enabling research agenda for the accounting/contracting nexus. Accounting Forum, 28, 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seal, W. B., Cullen, J., Dunlop, A., Berry, A., & Mirghani, A. (1999). Enacting a European supply chain: The role of management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 10, 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speklé, R. F. (2001). Explaining management control structure variety: A transaction cost economics perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(4–5), 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrane, S. (2007). The complexity of management accounting change: Bifurcation and oscillation in schizophrenic inter-organisational systems. Management Accounting Research, 248–272.

  • Thrane, S., & Hald, K. S. (2006). The emergence of boundaries and accounting in supply fields: The dynamics of integration and fragmentation. Management Accounting Research, 17, 288–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, C. (2001). Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 161–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer-Kooistra, J., & Vosselman, E. (2000). Management control of inter-firm transactional relationships: The case of industrial renovation and maintenance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(1), 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer-Kooistra, J., & Vosselman, E. (2006). Research on management control of interfirm transactional relationships: Whence and whither. Management Accounting Research, 17(3), 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verwaal, E., & Hesselmans, M. (2004). Drivers of supply networks governance: An explorative study of the dutch chemical industry. European Management Journal, 22(4), 442–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosselman, E., & van der Meer-Kooistra, J. (2009). Accounting for control and trust building in interfirm transactional relationships. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenger, T. R., & Hesterly, W. S. (1997). The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units. Organization Science, 8(3), 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Accounting Department, Università Bocconi – SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy

    Ariela Caglio & Angelo Ditillo

Authors
  1. Ariela Caglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angelo Ditillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariela Caglio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caglio, A., Ditillo, A. Interdependence and accounting information exchanges in inter-firm relationships. J Manag Gov 16, 57–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9136-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9136-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation