Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Birth Weight in Developing Countries: Does the Method of Reporting in Retrospective Surveys Matter?

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the patterns of recording birth weight data in retrospective surveys and their influence on birth weight estimates in less developed countries. We hypothesise that the method of reporting birth weight in surveys influences the classification of infants in the low birth weight category. Population-level data from Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in six selected countries representing different regions of the world were used. Birth weight data were reported in the survey from either an official health card or from mother’s memory. Birth weight distributions were examined in detail and revised low birth weight estimates were calculated accounting for potential heaping and data inconsistencies. There were substantial differences in the distribution of birth weights by method of reporting. The percentage of infants with low birth weight was higher in all six countries for birth weight recalled from memory than when reported from a health card. Health cards displayed less clustering on certain digits than memory recalled weights, but were still highly heaped in certain countries. Heaping of birth weight data on multiples of 500 g was also observed irrespective of any differences in method of reporting. The study concludes that the method of recording birth weight data can affect birth weight estimates in developing countries. Health systems in poor countries should initiate efforts to systematically monitor the recording of birth weight data ensuring for both quality and comparability at the international levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker, D. (2003). The developmental origins of adult disease. British Medical Journal, 23, 588–595.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kajantie, E., Osmond, C., Barker, D., Forsén, T., Phillips, D., & Eriksson, J. (2005). Size at birth as a predictor of mortality in adulthood: A follow-up of 350, 000 person-years. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 655–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moreno, L., & Goldman, N. (1990). An assessment of survey data on birth weight. Social Science and Medicine, 31(4), 491–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joffe, M., & Grisso, J. (1985). Comparison of antenatal hospital records with retrospective interviewing. Journal of Biosocial Science, 17, 113–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Sullivan, J., Pearce, M., & Parker, L. (2000). Parental recall of birth weight: How accurate is it? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 82, 202–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eggleston, E., Tsui, A. O., & Fortney, J. (2000). Assessing survey measures of infant birth weight and birth size in Ecuador. Journal of Biosocial Science, 32, 373–382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organisation and United Nations Children’s Fund (2004). Low birth weight: country, regional and global estimates. New York, UNICEF.

  8. Boerma, J. T., Weinstein, K. I., Rutstein, S. O., & Sommerfelt, A. E. (1996). Data on birth weight in developing countries: Can surveys help? Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 74(2), 209–216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blanc, A., & Wardlaw, T. (2005). Monitoring low birth weight: an evaluation of international estimates and an updated estimation procedure. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 83(3), 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robles, A., & Goldman, N. (1999). Can accurate data on birth weight be obtained from health interview surveys? International Journal of Epidemiology, 28, 925–931.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. ORC Macro. (2005). Demographic and Health Surveys. http://www.measuredhs. com. Accessed 6 Jun 2009.

  12. Seidman, D., Slater, P., Ever-Hadani, P., & Gale, R. (1987). Accuracy of mothers recall of birth weight and gestational age. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 94, 731–735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olson, J., Ou Shu, X., Ross, J., Pendergrass, T., & Robison, L. (1997). Medical record validation of maternally reported birth characteristics and pregnancy-related events: A report for the children’s cancer group. American Journal of Epidemiology, 145(1), 58–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hobbs, F. (2007). Age and sex composition. In J. Siegel & D. Swanson (Eds.), Methods and Materials of Demography (Vol. 2). Emerals: Chippenham and Eastbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Umbach, D. M. (2000). Unit conversion as a source of misclassification in US birth weight data. American Journal of Public Health, 90(1), 127–129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kramer, M. (1987). Determinants of low birth weight: Methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 65(5), 663–737.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Edouard, L., & Senthilselvan, A. (1997). Observer error and birth weight: Digit preference in recording. Public Health, 111(2), 77–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. UNDP. (2003). Human Development Report 2003. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. R. Channon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Channon, A.A.R., Padmadas, S.S. & McDonald, J.W. Measuring Birth Weight in Developing Countries: Does the Method of Reporting in Retrospective Surveys Matter?. Matern Child Health J 15, 12–18 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0553-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0553-3

Keywords

Navigation