Abstract
This research explores the development of landmark federal language policy in the United States: the Native American Languages Act of 1990/1992 (NALA). Overturning more than two centuries of United States American Indian policy, NALA established the federal role in preserving and protecting Native American languages. Indigenous languages in the United States are currently experiencing unprecedented language shift and NALA is a primary federal resource for Native American language programs. This research examines the local and national contexts and interests in which NALA developed from a grass-roots Native American language movement in the 1980s. The story of NALA stands as a powerful example of traditonally disenfranchised peoples transforming power relationships and creating language policy to support their language educaton practices and goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, R. (2001). “… To help assure the survival and continuing vitality of Native American Languages”. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 45–48). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Ethnographic methods in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 153–169). UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Charters, C., & Stavenhagen, R. (Eds.). (2009). Making the declaration work: The United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.
Davis, K. A. (1994). Language planning in multilingual contexts: Policies, communities, and schools in Luxembourg. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fishman, J. A. (1968). Sociolinguistics and the language problems of the developing countries. In J. A. Fishman, C. A. Ferguson, & J. Das Gupta (Eds.), Language problems of developing nations (pp. 3–16). New York: Wiley.
Freeman, R. D. (2004). Building on community bilingualism. Philadelphia: Caslon.
Hinton, L., & Hale, K. (Eds.). (2001). The green book of language revitalization in practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hornberger, N. (Ed.). (1997). Indigenous literacies in the Americas language planning from the bottom up. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hornberger, N. H., & Hult, F. M. (2008). Ecological language education policy. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), Handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 280–296). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hornberger, H., & Johnson, D. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.
Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.
Indian Education Unit of Arizona Department of Education. (1988). Proceedings of the eight annual Native American Language Issues Institute: Strengthening native languages through unity and commitment. Choctaw, OK: Native American Language Issues Institute.
Jaffe, A. (1999). Ideologies in action: Language politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johnson, F., & Legatz, J. (2006). Tséhootsooí Diné Bi’ólta’. Journal of American Indian Education, 45(2), 25–33.
Kamanā, K., & Wilson, W. (1996). Hawaiian language programs. In G. Cantoni (Ed.), Stabilizing indigenous languages. Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University Press.
Kamanā, K., & Wilson, W. (2008). Integrating identity and culture in Hawaiian Immersion. Paper presented at the meeting of CARLA/CAL on Immersion Education: Pathways to Bilingualism & Beyond, St. Paul, MN.
Kaplan, R., & Baldauf, R. (1997). Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Krauss, M. (1998). The condition of Native North American languages: The need for realistic assessment and action. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 132, 9–31.
Kroskrity, P., & Field, M. C. (Eds.). (2009). Native American language ideologies: Beliefs, practices, and struggles in Indian Country. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Leap, W. (1981). American Indian language maintenance. Annual Review of Anthropology, 10, 209–236.
Levinson, B., & Sutton, M. (2001). Introduction: Policy as/in practice—A sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In M. Sutton & B. Levinson (Eds.), Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 1–22). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Levinson, B., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tolls, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Education Policy, 23(6), 767–795.
Lomawaima, K. T., & McCarty, T. L. (2006). To remain an Indian: Lessons in democracy from a century of Native American education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
McCarty, T. (1993). Federal language policy and American Indian education. The Bilingual Research Journal, 17(1, 2), 13–34.
McCarty, T. (2002). A place to be Navajo: Rough Rock and the struggle for self-determination in indigenous schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McCarty, T. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
McCarty, T. L., & Warhol, L. (2011). The anthropology of language planning and policy. In B. Levinson & M. Farr (Eds.), Companion to anthropology of education (pp. 177–196). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
McCarty, T, Watahomigie, L., Yamamoto, A., & Zepeda, O. (2001). Indigenous educators as change agents: Case studies of two language institutes. In L. Hinton & K. Hale’s (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McLaughlin, D. (1992). When literacy empowers: Navajo language in print. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Menken, K., & Garcia, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. London: Routledge.
Moore, S. C. (2008). English-only organization. In J. Gonzalez (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Bilingual education (pp. 265–269). London: Sage Publications.
Reyhner, J., & Eder, J. (2006). American Indian education: A history. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.
Romaine, S. (2002). The impact of language policy on endangered languages. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 4(2), 1–28.
S.2044: To assist Native Americans in assuring the survival of their languages: Hearings before the select committee on Indian affairs. 102nd Congress (1992).
Schiffman, H. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London, UK: Routledge.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education—Or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & McCarty, T. L. (2007). Key concepts in bilingual education: Ideological, historical, epistemological, and empirical foundations. In J. Cummins (Vol. Ed.) & N. H. Hornberger (Series Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 5: Bilingual education (2nd revised ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
St. Clair, R. & Leap, W. (Eds.). (1982). Language renewal among American Indian tribes: Issues, problems and prospects. Arlington, VA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
Stritikus, T. (2002). Immigrant children and the politics of English-only. New York: LFB.
Stritikus, T. T., & Wiese, A. (2006). Reassessing the role of ethnographic methods in education policy research: Implementing bilingual education policy at local levels. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1106–1131.
Sutton, M., & Levinson, B. (Eds.). (2001). Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Szasz, M. (1999). Education and the American Indian: The road to self-determination, 1928–1998. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
The Native American Languages Act of 1990, P.L. 101-477 (1990).
The Native American Languages Act of 1992, P.L. 102-524 (1992).
Tollefson, J. (Ed.). (2002). Language policies in education: Critical issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Warhol, L. (2011). L. Native American language education as policy-in-practice: An interpretive policy analysis of the Native American Languages Act of 1990/1992. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(3), 279–299.
Warner, S. (2001). The movement to revitalize Hawaiian language and culture. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 133–146). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Watahomigie, L., & Yamamoto, A. (1992). Local reactions to perceived language decline. Language, 68, 10–17.
Wiley, T. G. (2004). Language planning, language policy and the English-only movement. In E. Finegan & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Language in the USA: Perspectives for the twenty-first century (pp. 319–338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, W. (1997). The sociopolitical context of establishing Hawaiian-based medium. In S. May (Ed.), Indigenous community-based education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Wilson, W., & Kamana, K. (2001). “Mai Loko Mai O Ka ‘I’ini: Proceeding from a dream”: The ‘Aha Punana Leo connection in Hawaiian language revitalization. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 147–178). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wolcott, H. (2008). Ethnography: A way of seeing (2nd ed.). London, UK: Altamira Press.
Wright, S. (2004). Language policy and language planning: From nationalism to globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warhol, L. Creating official language policy from local practice: the example of the Native American Languages Act 1990/1992. Lang Policy 11, 235–252 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9248-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9248-5